704 replies to this topic

[Sicario2g]

I missed the link as well

[Shawnito86]

This is really a nice website. It's great for looking at average damage of the general population and of the unicums to get some idea of what it takes for MOEs. Really good effort. I'm excited to see how the website grows in time. I imagine with some ads in the future, you could get a nice little source of income going and the site might pay for itself similar to WOTinfo.

[JoeDaFrogman]

Sent an email with suggestion for individual vehicle stat expansion.

[LGz JETHRO66]

Can somebody please email me the link please  

[LGz JETHRO66]

ooops double post

[Gel4ssen]

Hi All,

Sorry I haven't been active on the forums in a few days.  My other big hobby is racing cars -- I just got back from 4 days up in Sonoma, CA racing in the 24 Hours of Lemons series.  What a blast!

 

I should be able to work on the site a bit this week.  The current priority is to enable players to update their stats, track them over time, and more easily compare them with others.    

 

Concurrent with that, I'd like to try and see if we can get a more accurate WN8 rating for console players.  WOTINFO does an amazing job, but the underlying assumptions of "Expected Values" is based on PC data -- which is significantly (often hugely) different from our data.  For example, if you want to be a unicum on console, all you have to do is play the Pz. V/IV or the Panther 8.8 since they have different tiering/matchmaking on console.  It's wildly inaccurate.  My hope is that we can create a more accurate "Expected Values" database; WOTINFO can then use that data for WN8 calculations.

 

I have a list of about 30 requested features.  Hopefully I can post them to the website for review/comment.

 

As I've mentioned before, if you'd like to view the site, please e-mail me at Gr4btharsHammer@gmail.com and I can send you the link.  I want to keep the site small (and fun), so please don't post the link in the clear (but feel free to share it with friends).

 

Best!

 

 

[USSWISCONSIN94]

You don't want the site to have a lot of people why? That doesn't make sense

[PsyAshoka]

just thx 

 

[real FUGAR]

Big Data wow. Wait, we got 1 million Players ?!

Russians OP?  Get one Yourself, they won the War.

Bullfrog performing not like Tier 8 Premium? You bought a Toad with 100pen for TierX matches, what did You expect !

[WOT Owl]

Just wondering with the top 10 xp leaderboards. What all does this xp number include? Wanting to know because I rank pretty high in the ruskie meds and dont believe I deserve that spot.

[KaiserVonKrieg]

Will you include PS4 statistics separately or together or even at all?

WOTInfo separated them for their database and it worked out perfectly.

[AdmrHackett]

FusionStar287, on 04 November 2015 - 11:38 AM, said:

"The Löwe and T34 suck"
That statement alone tells me that nothing in the op is to be trusted.

 

Op changed their wording and proved there point. Fair enough.

 

 

The problem isn't that they suck. The problem is they are the 1st two tanks most noobs purchase to instantly get into high tier games.

[TocFanKe4]

I like the Lowe,  but the T34 does suck for me.

[xXCHOCO TACOXx]

Necro

[animatethant]

24hrs of lemons, did I read that correctly?

[Afro Palestine]

Turboclicker, on 04 November 2015 - 07:30 PM, said:

Your analysis is flawed, because you are doing it with a certain idea in mind. It's hard to explain but when you say "Accuracy is irrelevant", I'm assuming you mean accurate vehicles are having crap hit rates and inaccurate vehicles are having high hit rates, etc. This is inherently flawed because accuracy doesn't care what range you're firing at. If a tank is accurate, people will want to take it to long range, if they do that, the margin for error becomes slimmer and slimmer, while a highly inaccurate vehicle isnt going to miss much at point blank.

I could go on and on about other bits but you probably get the gist of what I'm saying. Data doesn't matter if it isn't analyzed properly.

 

Long range doesn't deter me in any tank.  If I have a clear shot and possible pen I take it whether I'm in a Russian TD, M4 105, or a Leopard 1.  Some tanks just make it easier.

[INDR1D COLD]

animatethant, on 19 April 2016 - 06:46 PM, said:

24hrs of lemons, did I read that correctly?

 

the 24 hours of lemons are always a blast to watch . hope to take part in one some day .

[neorioter]

Impressive work. Can you gather the epic medals' statistics? Number, frequency/rarity, players/tanks that earned them, etc.  

[killer etzi0]

neorioter, on 12 September 2016 - 07:58 AM, said:

Impressive work. Can you gather the epic medals' statistics? Number, frequency/rarity, players/tanks that earned them, etc.

 

Yes it would be interesting to see what the frequency rate is of some of the more difficult Medals. Good suggestion.

[Beef McLargeBig]

neorioter, on 12 September 2016 - 07:58 AM, said:

Impressive work. Can you gather the epic medals' statistics? Number, frequency/rarity, players/tanks that earned them, etc.  

 

killer etzi0, on 12 September 2016 - 07:59 AM, said:

 

Yes it would be interesting to see what the frequency rate is of some of the more difficult Medals. Good suggestion.

 

You're replying to a 5 month old thread.