Jump to content


E50M or Object 430: Choose one

E50 auf. M Object 430

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

Poll: Pick your Medium (47 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 50 battles in order to participate this poll.

E50 auf. M or Object 430

  1. E50M (32 votes [68.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 68.09%

  2. Object 430 (15 votes [31.91%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 31.91%

Vote Hide poll

WillowsII #1 Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:02 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24936 battles
  • 947
  • [-AXS-]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

If you had to choose between these two 'pocket heavies' or 'heavy medium hybrids', which one would you choose?

Supposedly ranked about equal in the opinion of unicums in order of Tier X mediums, one is a DPM machine, spitting out 3000 DPM, with amazing camo, but lack luster soft stats.

Whilst the other is nearly the complete opposite. Boasting a brutal ramming potential, insane accuracy and much improved soft stats, but low DPM for a medium and struggling for stealth and mobility.

For me, I have neither, but have made both my next targets. I think I'd go for the 430, just for the DPM and camo, thinking of running rings around those heavies.



Inglorious RO #2 Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:26 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12088 battles
  • 2,539
  • [DACII]
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014
430 is the third if not the second worst medium

 


RPGStylee #3 Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:27 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14782 battles
  • 13,632
  • Member since:
    05-12-2014
E-50m.

CHECK OUT MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL!

Please do it I have slow self-esteem you don't want to hurt my feels do you?

 

Head Kanonenjagdpanzer sales expert


WillowsII #4 Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:28 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24936 battles
  • 947
  • [-AXS-]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

View PostInglorious RO, on 28 December 2015 - 02:26 PM, said:

430 is the third if not the second worst medium

 

I'm not so sure, just because it's worse than its brothers doesn't make it worse than other tier X mediums such as the 4202

Inglorious RO #5 Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:46 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12088 battles
  • 2,539
  • [DACII]
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

View Postwillows360, on 28 December 2015 - 04:28 PM, said:

 

I'm not so sure, just because it's worse than its brothers doesn't make it worse than other tier X mediums such as the 4202

 

I never said it was worse than the 4202, which is in fact the only tank thats worse than the 430 and the patton is just as bad as the 430.

 


WillowsII #6 Posted 28 December 2015 - 03:39 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24936 battles
  • 947
  • [-AXS-]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

View PostInglorious RO, on 28 December 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:

 

I never said it was worse than the 4202, which is in fact the only tank thats worse than the 430 and the patton is just as bad as the 430.

 

So you're saying the 121 is better than the 430?

Inglorious RO #7 Posted 28 December 2015 - 03:56 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12088 battles
  • 2,539
  • [DACII]
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

View Postwillows360, on 28 December 2015 - 05:39 PM, said:

 

So you're saying the 121 is better than the 430?

 

yes

 


Blazestar4 #8 Posted 28 December 2015 - 04:02 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 7527 battles
  • 1,014
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

View PostInglorious RO, on 28 December 2015 - 09:26 AM, said:

430 is the third if not the second worst medium

Why?


My Tanks

    New French Tech Tree New Japanese Tech Tree


USSWISCONSIN94 #9 Posted 28 December 2015 - 04:06 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 11997 battles
  • 27,649
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Rather don't want either tbh. 430 has the most insane DPM i've seen and looks ok. E-50M is just a really fast King Tiger

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


RabidSasquatch0 #10 Posted 28 December 2015 - 05:49 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 20832 battles
  • 1,343
  • [VYPER]
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 28 December 2015 - 04:06 PM, said:

E-50M is just a really fast King Tiger

 

Save the extremely accurate gun (with great gun handling), much better sloped upper plate, higher weight, rear transmission, and increased gun depression.

 

Not exactly the same tank.



Mobius Y #11 Posted 28 December 2015 - 05:56 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 15000 battles
  • 11,284
  • Member since:
    02-10-2014
E-50M just for a more consistent gun.  The Object 430 is a damn fine tank and the line is an easy-peasy grind though.

Watch me stream games live > TwitchTwitter < Follow me for news and updates

I try to stream games every Friday evening at 9:00PM EST

I’m still around just not posting very much, send me a PM if you wish to communicate.


Inglorious RO #12 Posted 28 December 2015 - 08:28 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12088 battles
  • 2,539
  • [DACII]
  • Member since:
    04-19-2014

View PostBlazestar4, on 28 December 2015 - 06:02 PM, said:

Why?

 

extremely bad accuracy and dispersion, worst turret out of all tier X ru meds, very susceptible to module damage, worst side armor ( some sort of armor inspector will reveal it)

 


Nocturnal814 #13 Posted 28 December 2015 - 08:33 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 16690 battles
  • 9,952
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013
When did the object 430 become a pocket heavy? It's almost a light medium, kind of in the same class as the bat chat (object has better camp rating)...

something, something, something, dark side...

teknikk7 #14 Posted 28 December 2015 - 10:19 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12428 battles
  • 539
  • [TATER]
  • Member since:
    08-07-2014
430 grind is cake.  I have only had mine for a day but see potential, need to put yourself in positions to make that DMP work.  E50M is like a Tiger II as others mentioned, don't really care for mine.  Russian bias maybe? 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users