Jump to content


Australian Tech Tree

australian tech tree ac1 sentinel leopard italian tanks commonwealth captured tanks

  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

Metalrodent #21 Posted 19 June 2016 - 09:09 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 9070 battles
  • 13,643
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

Technically the Centurion Mk III is already in game, as that's what the fully upgraded Centurion I is. And the Centurion Mk V is probably just a tad OP at tier VIII

 

I dunno, cool as it would be a entire tree of oddbits from other nations under one flag would be kinda weird, and not exactly priority when half the tanks are already in game and there's still whole nations to be added (like the Italian tanks you suggest).

 


<a data-cke-saved-href='http://i.imgur.com/sCeAbYa.gif' href='http://i.imgur.com/sCeAbYa.gif' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/sCeAbYa.gif</a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s...sCeAbYa.gif</a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s...bYa.gif</a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s...gif</a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'>http://i.imgur.com/s.../a></a></a></a></a>

There’s a mask upon my face
I can’t live without
So you won’t recognize me
When I am in the crowd


AussieSoldier01 #22 Posted 19 June 2016 - 12:48 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7067 battles
  • 443
  • [VGC]
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015
Italian tech tree??? Didnt they spend the war hiding behind germans and running away a hell of a lot???....bring in Aussie tanks, at least we fight!

uzivatel #23 Posted 19 June 2016 - 04:04 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14937 battles
  • 646
  • [CZSK]
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Isnt the PC AC4 actually an AC1 with 17pdr?

Joco3000 #24 Posted 19 June 2016 - 04:30 PM

    Major

  • Supertester
  • 21280 battles
  • 23,486
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View Postuzivatel, on 19 June 2016 - 05:04 PM, said:

Isnt the PC AC4 actually an AC1 with 17pdr?

 

It's the as-built prototype, not the proposed production AC 4.

View PostAussieSoldier01, on 19 June 2016 - 01:48 PM, said:

Italian tech tree??? Didnt they spend the war hiding behind germans and running away a hell of a lot???....bring in Aussie tanks, at least we fight!

 

You also don't actually design your own tanks, with three exceptions that I know of.

Italy at least has enough designs to build their own tree.


You can PM with with questions, if you wish. I don't bite.

Compilation thread of my ideas


Sqn Ldr B #25 Posted 19 June 2016 - 04:33 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 6140 battles
  • 18,352
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostAussieSoldier01, on 19 June 2016 - 01:48 PM, said:

Italian tech tree??? Didnt they spend the war hiding behind germans and running away a hell of a lot???....bring in Aussie tanks, at least we fight!

 

At least they had more than four of their own tanks.

"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life" ~ Cecil Rhodes

Click For a Compilation of My Ideas


uzivatel #26 Posted 19 June 2016 - 04:59 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 14937 battles
  • 646
  • [CZSK]
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

View PostJoco3000, on 19 June 2016 - 04:30 PM, said:

It's the as-built prototype, not the proposed production AC 4.

 

​Makes you wonder if they would even fit the crew inside that thing - the turret ring is 54", which is same as Matilda or Churchill, smaller than Valentine or Cromwell. I doubt they ever fitted the 17pdr on Matilda and the other three tanks required serious redesign to use it.

AussieSoldier01 #27 Posted 20 June 2016 - 08:12 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7067 battles
  • 443
  • [VGC]
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015

View PostSqn Ldr B, on 20 June 2016 - 02:33 AM, said:

 

At least they had more than four of their own tanks.

 Really! ...Australia has fought with distinction in every conflict this century, no we didnt design many of our own tanks but we have achieved far more than the italians as far as warfare is concerned, and id rather fight beside one Australian than a million italians. 

 

 

In response to another comment about a tech tree filled with tanks from other nations, are there not tanks in the Russian and Chinese tech trees that are there because of a lend lease agreement? Who cares if the Aussie tech tree is filled with British and finally a german tank.....we kick [edited]and should be included considering our contribution to warfare this century.



AussieSoldier01 #28 Posted 20 June 2016 - 08:15 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7067 battles
  • 443
  • [VGC]
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015
Correction....this and last century. 

NSW Mntd Rifles #29 Posted 20 June 2016 - 09:01 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 26754 battles
  • 515
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

I proposed an Australian tech tree last year, but having considered the issue, I would prefer to see the AC-1 Sentinel as a premium (PLEASE) and also the AC-4 as a premium in preference to a special tech tree.

 

There is a lot of scope for Wargaming to introduce a Czechoslovakian tech tree, a Polish tech tree and Italian tech tree. 

 

It would be nice if there were more opportunities to customise tanks with emblems and camouflage specific to the smaller nations. I know us Aussies have the Blue Ensign, a rather small white kangaroo and a drop bear, but there is more scope for customising tanks. 


Edited by NSW Mntd Rifles, 20 June 2016 - 09:03 AM.


Sqn Ldr B #30 Posted 20 June 2016 - 09:16 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 6140 battles
  • 18,352
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostAussieSoldier01, on 20 June 2016 - 09:12 AM, said:

 Really! ...Australia has fought with distinction in every conflict this century, no we didnt design many of our own tanks but we have achieved far more than the italians as far as warfare is concerned, and id rather fight beside one Australian than a million italians. 

 

 

In response to another comment about a tech tree filled with tanks from other nations, are there not tanks in the Russian and Chinese tech trees that are there because of a lend lease agreement? Who cares if the Aussie tech tree is filled with British and finally a german tank.....we kick [edited]and should be included considering our contribution to warfare this century.

 

There are four out of like fifty in the Russian tree that are Lend Lease tanks. This has like three Australian tanks out of twelve. See the difference. The Australians did not achieve more than the Italians in terms of tank design at all. They built about four of their own tanks and the rest came from overseas. There isn't much of a point to it.

"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life" ~ Cecil Rhodes

Click For a Compilation of My Ideas


Knot3D #31 Posted 20 June 2016 - 09:23 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19531 battles
  • 2,259
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015

This Australian Matilda still runs mighty fine

 



DaffierPear6 #32 Posted 20 June 2016 - 11:05 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Supertester
  • 14535 battles
  • 552
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

...... Have I stirred up a 'hornets nest'??

 

WG, PC has the AC4 as a Premium.  Please bring it to console!!  :)



Joco3000 #33 Posted 20 June 2016 - 11:38 AM

    Major

  • Supertester
  • 21280 battles
  • 23,486
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View PostAussieSoldier01, on 20 June 2016 - 09:12 AM, said:

 Really! ...Australia has fought with distinction in every conflict this century, no we didnt design many of our own tanks but we have achieved far more than the italians as far as warfare is concerned, and id rather fight beside one Australian than a million italians.

 

 

In response to another comment about a tech tree filled with tanks from other nations, are there not tanks in the Russian and Chinese tech trees that are there because of a lend lease agreement? Who cares if the Aussie tech tree is filled with British and finally a german tank.....we kick [edited]and should be included considering our contribution to warfare this century.

 

To put it bluntly, the military record of a nation has no bearing on their inclusion in-game.

​Take the next confirmed nation for example. Sweden.

 

​Sweden has always had a very active tank development industry, and arms in general, despite not seeing any war for hundreds of years.

 

​Italy at least developed or designed enough tanks to scrape together a whole tree. As did another neutral nation, Switzerland. Australia, despite building most of their military tech, doesn't design it. That's why an Australian tree is improbable.

​Australian tanks are most likely to be shoehorned into the British tech tree. That should be preferable to not having them, no?


You can PM with with questions, if you wish. I don't bite.

Compilation thread of my ideas


HBOMB 18882 #34 Posted 20 June 2016 - 11:42 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 31028 battles
  • 686
  • [II]
  • Member since:
    09-02-2014
The 46 Patton would be the tier 9

AussieSoldier01 #35 Posted 20 June 2016 - 01:12 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7067 battles
  • 443
  • [VGC]
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015

View PostSqn Ldr B, on 20 June 2016 - 07:16 PM, said:

 

There are four out of like fifty in the Russian tree that are Lend Lease tanks. This has like three Australian tanks out of twelve. See the difference. The Australians did not achieve more than the Italians in terms of tank design at all. They built about four of their own tanks and the rest came from overseas. There isn't much of a point to it.

 

Fair comment.......forgive my overly passionate response, once a soldier always a soldier, and because i served im bias. 



AussieSoldier01 #36 Posted 20 June 2016 - 01:13 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7067 battles
  • 443
  • [VGC]
  • Member since:
    04-04-2015

View PostJoco3000, on 20 June 2016 - 09:38 PM, said:

 

To put it bluntly, the military record of a nation has no bearing on their inclusion in-game.

​Take the next confirmed nation for example. Sweden.

 

​Sweden has always had a very active tank development industry, and arms in general, despite not seeing any war for hundreds of years.

 

​Italy at least developed or designed enough tanks to scrape together a whole tree. As did another neutral nation, Switzerland. Australia, despite building most of their military tech, doesn't design it. That's why an Australian tree is improbable.

​Australian tanks are most likely to be shoehorned into the British tech tree. That should be preferable to not having them, no?

 

Tottaly understand your point, as i mentioned above forgive my passionate  (not neccesarily well thought through) response



DragonAssasin98 #37 Posted 21 June 2016 - 08:10 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19871 battles
  • 888
  • [BAW-4]
  • Member since:
    12-14-2015

View PostNSW Mntd Rifles, on 19 June 2016 - 06:12 AM, said:

 

The French are in the xbox game.

Obviously then i mean ps4



DaffierPear6 #38 Posted 22 June 2016 - 03:54 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Supertester
  • 14535 battles
  • 552
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

Well surely WG can bring the AC4 to xbox as a Premium, like they have on PC!!

 

Who wants to earn it as a 'Hero Tank' ???



Maniac57c #39 Posted 22 June 2016 - 03:59 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21424 battles
  • 1,472
  • Member since:
    01-08-2016

All this hating on the M3Lee....

I hated it at first too....but once I started playing it like a TD, I became a fan.

 



HARDCORE 2Omk #40 Posted 22 June 2016 - 04:10 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 26455 battles
  • 8,371
  • [UNI]
  • Member since:
    03-24-2014

I'm down!

 


If Patton had a choice? He would be in a E50! Signature by xRoni7x..

 

Monster trucking in a Pz 5/4 http://xboxdvr.com/g...k/video/5866659





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users