AussieSoldier01, on 20 June 2016 - 09:12 AM, said:
Really! ...Australia has fought with distinction in every conflict this century, no we didnt design many of our own tanks but we have achieved far more than the italians as far as warfare is concerned, and id rather fight beside one Australian than a million italians.
In response to another comment about a tech tree filled with tanks from other nations, are there not tanks in the Russian and Chinese tech trees that are there because of a lend lease agreement? Who cares if the Aussie tech tree is filled with British and finally a german tank.....we kick [edited]and should be included considering our contribution to warfare this century.
To put it bluntly, the military record of a nation has no bearing on their inclusion in-game.
Take the next confirmed nation for example. Sweden.
Sweden has always had a very active tank development industry, and arms in general, despite not seeing any war for hundreds of years.
Italy at least developed or designed enough tanks to scrape together a whole tree. As did another neutral nation, Switzerland. Australia, despite building most of their military tech, doesn't design it. That's why an Australian tree is improbable.
Australian tanks are most likely to be shoehorned into the British tech tree. That should be preferable to not having them, no?