Jump to content


Awesome premium request

Premium IS 3A

  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

SteelCityBlitzZ #1 Posted 28 September 2016 - 02:08 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29912 battles
  • 290
  • [GUNZ]
  • Member since:
    01-17-2016

It would be nice to see the premium tanks from the PC version become available on the console version like the tier 8 IS 3A variant featured a double-row ammo rack with an automatic loading system. The crew was reduced to three members: commander, gunner, and driver. The turret was redesigned in order to accommodate the loading mechanism. or maybe introduce  the first tier 10 heavy the VK. 72.01(k) or the American t95 E6  what a great change to bring to the existing premiums line on the Xbox & PS 4 platform.   https://youtu.be/SL9n2v8GDoA



Mavrick247 #2 Posted 28 September 2016 - 05:58 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 49706 battles
  • 453
  • [TR-]
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013
The is3a will probably make a appearance on console in the future but alas for the over two very unlikely as they are clan reward tanks and we don't have clan wars on console as of yet

 

 

 

 


RaiBOT01 #3 Posted 28 September 2016 - 09:27 PM

    (Cat) Community Manager

  • Administrator
  • 2816 battles
  • 13,673
  • [WGW]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2013

Will add your tank to the list of premium tank requests!! <3

 


<a data-cke-saved-href='http://www.pixeljoint.com/files/icons/walkingcat_by_thetaupe.gif' href='http://www.pixeljoint.com/files/icons/walkingcat_by_thetaupe.gif' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin...by_thetaupe.gif</a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin...hetaupe.gif</a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin...upe.gif</a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin...gif</a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'><a href='http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a>' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='external'>http://www.pixeljoin.../a></a></a></a></a> 

Player's passion for our games is the fuel that keeps my tank engine running every day.

"Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right" - Isaac Asimov

Follow me on Twitter: @RAIBot01 - Crew Skills and Perks

Click to send in a XBOX  -  PS4


Hellhound2723 #4 Posted 29 September 2016 - 01:10 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29263 battles
  • 412
  • [AA]
  • Member since:
    09-10-2013
How about a premium version of the Russian T-72 before they started adding modern technology to it, it was developed in the 60's.

"SOUND THE CHARGE"   

  

  

 


greyweasel UK #5 Posted 29 September 2016 - 01:17 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 17384 battles
  • 1,657
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View PostHellhound2723, on 29 September 2016 - 01:10 AM, said:

How about a premium version of the Russian T-72 before they started adding modern technology to it, it was developed in the 60's.

 

It's a smoothbore so no dice. Why go twice above the logical next step in the timeline? T-64>Object 430, that's a smoothbore too but still.

Hellhound2723 #6 Posted 29 September 2016 - 01:22 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29263 battles
  • 412
  • [AA]
  • Member since:
    09-10-2013

View Postgreyweasel UK, on 28 September 2016 - 07:17 PM, said:

 

It's a smoothbore so no dice. Why go twice above the logical next step in the timeline? T-64>Object 430, that's a smoothbore too but still.

 

​There was a variant with a rifled barrel that was in the development stage.

"SOUND THE CHARGE"   

  

  

 


Hellhound2723 #7 Posted 29 September 2016 - 01:54 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29263 battles
  • 412
  • [AA]
  • Member since:
    09-10-2013
The T-62A which is currently in the game also had a smoothbore gun, the T-72 directly replaced the T-54/55 and the T-64 and T-72 were in development at the same time.  The T-64 was just too expensive and the engine was unreliable.  Why not add them both?  There are other tanks in game already that are pushing the timeline boundry like early 70's.

"SOUND THE CHARGE"   

  

  

 


SGT Rock 1963 #8 Posted 29 September 2016 - 03:33 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 12838 battles
  • 4,292
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View Postroccojoseph, on 28 September 2016 - 09:08 AM, said:

It would be nice to see the premium tanks from the PC version become available on the console version like the tier 8 IS 3A variant featured a double-row ammo rack with an automatic loading system. The crew was reduced to three members: commander, gunner, and driver. The turret was redesigned in order to accommodate the loading mechanism. or maybe introduce  the first tier 10 heavy the VK. 72.01(k) or the American t95 E6  what a great change to bring to the existing premiums line on the Xbox & PS 4 platform

 

​I want an lS-3A, As well. But it is not an auto-loader. Search lS 3A tank review Quickybaby.


monkeyCOWman #9 Posted 29 September 2016 - 07:12 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 10317 battles
  • 1,558
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

View PostSGT Rock 1963, on 28 September 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:

 

​I want an lS-3A, As well. But it is not an auto-loader. Search lS 3A tank review Quickybaby.

 

PC no auto loader, BLITZ added the auto loader....console could go either way 

Garage: TOGII*, Excelsior, Matilda Black Prince, FV4202(P)^, CentennialT/95, Matilda, Cromwell^, Comet^^Centurion 7/1^, CenturionAX, T1E6X, T1E6X-X1, T7 CC, M22 Locust, Ram II, MTLS B, Pz38H, PzIID, PzIIJ, Pz T25, Hammer, FCM36pack40, AMX CDC^, BDR G1B^^, ARL 44^, AMX 50 100^, AMX 50 120, T-127, BT7A-R, BTSV, Matilda IV, SU76i, Motherland, Fatherland, Object 416^, Object 430-||,  The Nameless, Ke Ne, Chi-Ri^, STA-1^, Type 61^, Type 59^, Skoda T25, TVP, Strv m/42-57, L-60, Strv 74, 

*Elite*Premium*Grind*Tier 10*marks^*Bold(Favourite)


leova #10 Posted 29 September 2016 - 07:17 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 11313 battles
  • 12,907
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    06-11-2014
I feel like an autoloading IS-3 would be OP as heck! :ohmy:

PaperSparrow #11 Posted 29 September 2016 - 11:44 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10009 battles
  • 50
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View Postgreyweasel UK, on 29 September 2016 - 01:17 AM, said:

 

It's a smoothbore so no dice. Why go twice above the logical next step in the timeline? T-64>Object 430, that's a smoothbore too but still.

 

I've heard it mentioned several times but can someone explain why a smoothbore gun is a no-no? What gameplay differences would it make?

If it's due to the fact they could fire missiles then just don't include that feature.



greyweasel UK #12 Posted 30 September 2016 - 05:53 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 17384 battles
  • 1,657
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View PostPaperSparrow, on 29 September 2016 - 11:44 AM, said:

 

I've heard it mentioned several times but can someone explain why a smoothbore gun is a no-no? What gameplay differences would it make?

If it's due to the fact they could fire missiles then just don't include that feature.

 

I can't actually find a statement from the PC side about it, but it seems to boil down to that they just don't want to add them. Lord knows I want a proper production T-62 but their stupid illogical block prevents it. 

 

But on the logic side I think the whole process of introducing smoothbore guns would start a new power creep with pen capabilities gradually pushing further and further than what they are now. For example the T-62's first 115mm APFSDS could pen 300mm (0 degree slope) of RHA at 1km and don't even talk about the HEAT. We don't fight at those ranges. Even with a slope and increased pen drop off at that range, it would be ludicrous to think of the penetration potential at 400m or less.

 

To put it in another way smoothbore guns allow (a small amount of) higher velocity in relative caliber terms but the accuracy may suffer. Hence why the longest tank kill was made by a Chally.

 

It's probably just a headache they don't want to think about with the calculating & balancing. 



greyweasel UK #13 Posted 30 September 2016 - 06:47 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 17384 battles
  • 1,657
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View PostHellhound2723, on 29 September 2016 - 01:22 AM, said:

 

​There was a variant with a rifled barrel that was in the development stage.

 

You mean the T-72 with a rifled gun? 'cause I've never heard of that.

SteelCityBlitzZ #14 Posted 30 September 2016 - 03:35 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29912 battles
  • 290
  • [GUNZ]
  • Member since:
    01-17-2016

View PostSGT Rock 1963, on 28 September 2016 - 10:33 PM, said:

 

​I want an lS-3A, As well. But it is not an auto-loader. Search lS 3A tank review Quickybaby.

 

ohh got ya thanks

SGT Rock 1963 #15 Posted 30 September 2016 - 06:40 PM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 12838 battles
  • 4,292
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View Postroccojoseph, on 30 September 2016 - 10:35 AM, said:

 

ohh got ya thanks

 

I still want it, Now. LoL





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users