Jump to content


World of Tanks Console: Ranked Battles OFFICIAL FEEDBACK!

ranked battles feedback developers

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
135 replies to this topic

leova #41 Posted 18 February 2017 - 03:42 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 10272 battles
  • 12,059
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    06-11-2014

The "X Ladder games to go" Pop-Up after every battle (AND after every LOG entry), is very annoying.

and anyone else notice the creepy "whisper" ? :unsure:

 

I hope the Points pop-ups arent so pervasive...



Highlander11beez #42 Posted 18 February 2017 - 03:44 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7455 battles
  • 222
  • Member since:
    08-21-2013
Yeah I'm officially done. When you literally carry the team and do 1k damage more than anybody and you lose and lose points I'm done. It's all centered on winning. Winning doesn't mean poop.
   Also no one works together because it's all about who can seal club the most so people either steal kills or try and block you from dealing damage. Idk what the answer to ranked battles is but this is why I stopped playing ranked battles the first time. Phobia is spot on wg. Watch his video he posted and learn from it.

JustinOfTheUSA #43 Posted 18 February 2017 - 03:50 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14974 battles
  • 3,073
  • [A7CAV]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostOutlaw23V, on 17 February 2017 - 08:21 AM, said:

I personally feel that this mode should only be done in team destruction. Seeing a lot of base captures.

Yes

View PostIBROX 04, on 17 February 2017 - 05:25 AM, said:

I wouldn't mind a crew XP bonus as an incentive to play RB. 

I think an XP boost/silver boost would be good too

View PostDragonSlayer SE, on 17 February 2017 - 09:01 AM, said:

Lights are op in same tier!

Agreed

View PostHighlander11beez, on 17 February 2017 - 08:44 PM, said:

Yeah I'm officially done. When you literally carry the team and do 1k damage more than anybody and you lose and lose points I'm done. It's all centered on winning. Winning doesn't mean poop.
Also no one works together because it's all about who can seal club the most so people either steal kills or try and block you from dealing damage. Idk what the answer to ranked battles is but this is why I stopped playing ranked battles the first time. Phobia is spot on wg. Watch his video he posted and learn from it.

 

Yep, this is basically how I feel, it should NOT be based on winning, nothing should be, because it doesn't matter if I do 2k damage in my T14, my team is already mostly dead.


Regular Tanks Tanks: M41 Bulldog • T54E1 • T95  • Caernarvon • Tortoise • Indian-Pz. • T-44 • ST-I  • T-34-1• IS-2 • O-Ni • 

Premium Tanks: Freedom • T14 • AMX CDC • Hammer • Blitzen • Fatherland

Tier Tens: T110E5 • E-100 • IS-7

Updated June 7, 2017

Reskins do not equal content


MerryToast7699 #44 Posted 18 February 2017 - 05:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 1318 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    09-15-2016

View Postleova, on 17 February 2017 - 07:42 PM, said:

The "X Ladder games to go" Pop-Up after every battle (AND after every LOG entry), is very annoying.

and anyone else notice the creepy "whisper" ? :unsure:

 

I hope the Points pop-ups arent so pervasive...

Yeah, the "whisper" is kind of weird. 

 

Yeah, it occurred to me that lights would be fun to play in this. I had better luck in my Crusader than my Leopard though; not all lights are OP at that tier, I would think.



TheDeadTANKer #45 Posted 18 February 2017 - 07:17 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 20409 battles
  • 3,543
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
"Git Gud"  WG

A Wild Kush #46 Posted 18 February 2017 - 10:52 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13455 battles
  • 594
  • [PANZR]
  • Member since:
    03-03-2014
Considering this is ranked battles we should not be punished for our teams preformance, maybe remove certain premiums from ranked battle, some are down right dirty, V/IV's hit points for example.

Tier X (Leopard 1, E-50, E-100, Waffle E-100, Jagpanzer e-100, fv4005 Stage 2, T57 Heavy, T92, Type 5 Heavy, Object 430,)) Premium, T2 light, T7 Car, M22 Locust, MTLS-1G14, Lycan T71, M41B Brazil, Ram II, Fury, Freedom, T95E2, T14, Scorpion, T28 HTC, Snakebite, Matilda BP, Centennial T95, Knight, TOG II*, Sexton I,  Pz.38h, P.z II D, Pz II.J, P.z T-15, Aufkl.panther, Pz.s35, Gr.Tr, Pz.V/IV, T-25, Hydrostat, Kraft Panther Panther 8.8, Pz.B2, Hammer, Stug IV, E-25, KanJPz, JagTig 8,8, AMX Chaffee, AMX CDC, liberté, FCM 36 Pak 40, 105 leFH18b2, Tetrarch, BT-SV, T-127, M3 Light, Valentine II, T-50-2,  Matilda IV, T-34-88, Motherland, Churchill III, IS-2, KV-5, Gorynych KV-5 Su-76i, SU-100Y, ISU-122S, Type 59, Chi-Nu Kai, Kaiju O-I,)  

 


Not that proud #47 Posted 18 February 2017 - 01:21 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 17494 battles
  • 5,578
  • Member since:
    02-22-2014
Steppes - Sandstorm should not be in the rotation for Ranked Battles. That makes no sense at tier 5. Please fix this.

alvarado79936 #48 Posted 18 February 2017 - 04:18 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 36215 battles
  • 1,138
  • Member since:
    07-12-2013

The whole point reward system is screwed up. I mean I do great in a game and carry the team and get 20 points. I do great in a loss and terrible teammates cause a loss and lose 30+ points I mean what gives.

The point reward system needs to be based on individual  effort regardless of win or loss. Why should a scrub get points due to my herculean  effort. Looking at the after action report is astonishing some times, if it wasn't for my efforts the majority of those games would of been losses. Yes, I believe I'm that good


El Cucuy

Being to aggressive is my downfall


BULLPUPBAKERST1 #49 Posted 18 February 2017 - 04:21 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 31779 battles
  • 8,967
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

First...I only had to complete five battles to get placed...the fifth battle actually subtracted points too (-2). Other folks have been posting they had to run 10 battles to get placed. 

 

I played during prime-time (east coast) last night and the queue population for these battles was really low for the entire hour to 1-1/2 that I participated. Judging from the number of stomps, this low population probably wasn't resulting in similarly skilled players being matched up. 

 

Lastly, I think something needs to be done about scouts with this mode going forward. Yes, I did a bit of dominating in my Churchill III, but the Chaffe carries I watched were quite ridiculous. If you ever move this to tier 7 and keep 7v7, the Bulldogs, T71 variants, etc., will be unstoppable. 


 

100% Credit/Thanks to Violet Viper X for the fantastic Sig. 

 

The true man wants two things: danger and play. For that reason he wants woman, as the most dangerous plaything.-Nietzsche-

 


John Arrowsmith #50 Posted 18 February 2017 - 04:33 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 55078 battles
  • 7,733
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
The point system is stupid, you can win 3 battles in a row then lose more than you've gained on 1 loss. 

nocapkillall, on 21 July 2017 - 08:15 AM, said:

I'll finally be achieving one of my lifetime dreams of having a positive rep on this forum.

 

 


FinlandRed #51 Posted 18 February 2017 - 05:02 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 14960 battles
  • 456
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

Here's my thoughts

 

I agree with other posters that lights are stupidly OP in this format.

The points system is extremely opaque. I've had games where I'm first out in T67 after a spot and two shots and I get 47 points for the win. Then I play the V/IV, come top with 1200 damage and only get 19 points for a win.

Team composition. Two O-I Exps on a red team is a big ask to because of the sheer number of hit points they have. I think they had more HP than most of the greens combined.

Many games seem very one sided and only take 2 minutes. Either you steamroller the reds or get steamrollered. It's like playing Blitz. What's wrong with full 15v15 battles? That would take the edge off the lights for a start.

Overall it seems as ill conceived as before. 



DragonSlayer SE #52 Posted 18 February 2017 - 06:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34551 battles
  • 132
  • [STRV]
  • Member since:
    10-17-2013
If yoy carry your team an still loose.. You loose more points than wen you do boting


SWaGLoRDxXx420 #53 Posted 18 February 2017 - 07:04 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7740 battles
  • 106
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015
I'm seeing at least one afk'er per game.

leova #54 Posted 18 February 2017 - 07:21 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 10272 battles
  • 12,059
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    06-11-2014

View PostFinlandRed, on 18 February 2017 - 12:02 PM, said:

 What's wrong with full 15v15 battles?

 

yeah, I'm not liking the 7v7 so far

 

it practically forces lemming trains, it makes it so you never have any backup/support, the balance is WAY off.....and it just doesnt feel right!

 

10v10 at least so we have some targets to work with!



IBROX 04 #55 Posted 18 February 2017 - 08:11 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 16810 battles
  • 3,056
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014
Pts seem to have changed , +24 pts win -6 pts for a loss. Both good games. 

https://www.sbhscotland.org.uk            

 

 

 

 


Gigab0mb #56 Posted 18 February 2017 - 09:11 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 33194 battles
  • 591
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014
The smaller matchmaking sizes are great. Definitely better than 15 v 15. Really lets the mediums and lights shine instead of the heavy slugfests that dominated previous ranked battles. 

Edited by Gigab0mb, 18 February 2017 - 09:13 PM.


Gigab0mb #57 Posted 18 February 2017 - 09:29 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 33194 battles
  • 591
  • Member since:
    04-03-2014

View Postleova, on 18 February 2017 - 11:21 AM, said:

 

yeah, I'm not liking the 7v7 so far

 

it practically forces lemming trains

 

It forces the group to support one another and the spotter to actually do its job.


Edited by Gigab0mb, 18 February 2017 - 09:30 PM.


the_oldman666 #58 Posted 18 February 2017 - 09:31 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 14079 battles
  • 2
  • [IRON2]
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostIBROX 04, on 17 February 2017 - 08:57 PM, said:

Even the silver isn't worth it. So far I've made just 190k & 35% on a skill on Wardaddy . Seen a few players AFK'ers? Lol. As it is, there is nothing really in this for anyone to keep playing it, it isn't worth the effort, maybe it does need some incentive, I think the full thing is too up and down. +21 pts for a win & -31 pts for a loss. Still don't get that ?.

 

hell brother I got 31 points for a win didn't fire a shot just capped the base !!! seems like a game of damage points would go more that way

happydundee #59 Posted 18 February 2017 - 10:58 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15993 battles
  • 599
  • [BEARD]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2016
I'm done with it. Qualified in Gold II,  Got to Platinum.

The battles are not ranked,  you play against the same people as normal games.

Everyone seems to want to cap, as winning ensures +points.

Doesn't matter how well you do in a loss, you lose points.

I killed the only 3 reds in a loss with 1200 damage and lost 9 points.  I YOLO d and died on a win with 5 spots and nothing else and got +31.

Its is pointless (pun intended)

You should just run the divisions and leagues on normal battles and put players in according to wn8 or whatever rating that WG use.


MerryToast7699 #60 Posted 18 February 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 1318 battles
  • 114
  • Member since:
    09-15-2016

View PostNot that proud, on 18 February 2017 - 05:21 AM, said:

Steppes - Sandstorm should not be in the rotation for Ranked Battles. That makes no sense at tier 5. Please fix this.

 

RB was the first time I've seen Steppes - Sandstorm. I thought it was awesome because it really points up the need to work together. Why do you think it makes no sense at Tier V?

 

I had to play ten games to get a ranking, too, not five. 







Also tagged with ranked, battles, feedback, developers

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users