Jump to content


Should the Chieftain get a armor buff ?


  • Please log in to reply
138 replies to this topic

Gigantic Owl #121 Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:54 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21346 battles
  • 11,426
  • [7F]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

I agree there is not much a tier 8 can do in a tier 10 game especially when the tier 8 is stock.

 

There is alot you can do if you know how to play


 

An actual gameplay expert

 

Check out my guides on the bunker.  http://thebunker.fre...ide-compilation


Joco3000 #122 Posted 22 March 2017 - 11:54 PM

    Major

  • Supertester
  • 21261 battles
  • 23,442
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View PostDustyHooves, on 22 March 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

 

I'm saying nothing of the sort.
What I am saying is that I don't think most 8's are equipped to contribute in tier 10 games.  Tier 10 games should be limited only to tier 9 and 10 tanks with exceptions for tier 8 arty and scouts.
I don't know anything about decade long glitches. Just a system that feeds tier 8's into tier 10 games to make the Q wait times shorter and frustrate tier 8 players.

 

Most tier VIIIs are more than capable in tier X games. Some do struggle, but those very same tanks also do quite well when top tier, so they are balanced overall. It's just a matter of playstyle.

 

If you do struggle when bottom tier, we can offer advice. It's obvious the matchmaking isn't ever going to change (the new matchmaker WG is trialing on PC is still +/-2), so anything​ you need assistance with, please ask.

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 11:50 PM, said:

I agree there is not much a tier 8 can do in a tier 10 game especially when the tier 8 is stock.

 

That's a slightly different, more complex matter.

It doesn't help that some stock tanks are more than capable in such situations.


You can PM with with questions, if you wish. I don't bite.

Compilation thread of my ideas


SGT Hawkens117 #123 Posted 23 March 2017 - 12:12 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15778 battles
  • 680
  • [SMORG]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostGigantic Owl, on 22 March 2017 - 11:54 PM, said:

 

There is alot you can do if you know how to play

I know how to play but a Stock T32 will not do jack $h1t against a T110E5 or E50.



RagingxMarmoset #124 Posted 23 March 2017 - 12:34 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 9357 battles
  • 5,081
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 06:12 PM, said:

I know how to play but a Stock T32 will not do jack $h1t against a T110E5 or E50.

That's not true at all.



SGT Hawkens117 #125 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:01 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15778 battles
  • 680
  • [SMORG]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostRagingxMarmoset, on 23 March 2017 - 12:34 AM, said:

That's not true at all.

Yea it is true you can damage them in the back but let's be realistic you are not going to be getting behind those tanks and survive. You will meet them frontally and they will tear you apart so yes it is true.



Gigantic Owl #126 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:07 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21346 battles
  • 11,426
  • [7F]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 07:12 PM, said:

I know how to play but a Stock T32 will not do jack $h1t against a T110E5 or E50.

 

You can pen either of those from the side. You play a support role when bottom tier


 

An actual gameplay expert

 

Check out my guides on the bunker.  http://thebunker.fre...ide-compilation


Guru Bheeshma #127 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:11 AM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 15924 battles
  • 1,559
  • Member since:
    11-26-2013

View PostGigantic Owl, on 22 March 2017 - 05:07 PM, said:

 

You can pen either of those from the side. You play a support role when bottom tier

 

​^this^ ... helping the big guns & armor in the front is also an important task when playing bottom tier!


 


DutchCupid62 #128 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:39 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 8552 battles
  • 2,708
  • [NLPZ1]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostGigantic Owl, on 23 March 2017 - 02:07 AM, said:

 

You can pen either of those from the side. You play a support role when bottom tier

Or load the skill rounds and have something like 258 or 268mm penetration. And the T32 has better turret armor than a lot of tier 10 heavy tanks.


NLPZR Dutch clan recruitment thread:

http://forum-console...-clan-xbox-one/

 


RagingxMarmoset #129 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:45 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 9357 battles
  • 5,081
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostDutchCupid62, on 22 March 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

Or load the skill rounds and have something like 258 or 268mm penetration. And the T32 has better turret armor than a lot of tier 10 heavy tanks.

When stock it has a much weaker mantlet, but still serviceable. Upgraded it is impenetrable.



DutchCupid62 #130 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:48 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 8552 battles
  • 2,708
  • [NLPZ1]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostRagingxMarmoset, on 23 March 2017 - 06:45 AM, said:

When stock it has a much weaker mantlet, but still serviceable. Upgraded it is impenetrable.

Oh [edited]I forgot about that. My bad. I thought that it gets the god turret right from the start.

 

But the skill rounds are still an option.


NLPZR Dutch clan recruitment thread:

http://forum-console...-clan-xbox-one/

 


CORE 1x #131 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:51 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 6737 battles
  • 1,258
  • [HARDD]
  • Member since:
    04-06-2016

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 19 March 2017 - 04:24 PM, said:

I feel the chieftains hull armor should be buffed 

 

Just the hatch. 

 

  ♠ Monster trucking Pz 5/4 ♠  http://xboxdvr.com/g...k/video/5866659

 

 


USSWISCONSIN94 #132 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:56 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 6534 battles
  • 21,937
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostCORE 1x, on 23 March 2017 - 12:51 AM, said:

 

Just the hatch. 

It's fine the way it is. Smaller target than the E5's.


http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


DontSweatJosh #133 Posted 23 March 2017 - 10:48 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 10113 battles
  • 377
  • Member since:
    03-03-2014
The tank is BA. I don't do well with it but I'm not great either. A lot of user error on my part. The thing I dislike about it though is that I can't brawl with her at all. Ridgeline only and that's not arty safety. See the thing is you can't use flat surfaces to fight on but once you find a hill down ridge area arty is waiting on you.

View PostPsycosiss, on 17 May 2014 - 01:55 AM, said:

Because the forums are for trolling not the acquisition of knowledge...

 

Big Yeash #134 Posted 23 March 2017 - 11:12 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 18293 battles
  • 2,449
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    08-25-2015

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 12:02 AM, said:

Hey but it's a source.

 

Wikipedia is not a source. It's a reference publication that contains sources.

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 22 March 2017 - 06:38 PM, said:

Then you can't say it is wrong if you don't know where it comes from.

 

By which logic, you can't say that it is right.


Favourite marks earned: Centurion 7/1**, Conqueror** - T-44**, ISU-152** - E-75**, Ferdinand**, Champion/M10 **, WT auf PZ. IV** AMX ELC bis***, AMX 13 75***, AMX 13 90**

If you see me performing really badly on the EU server, it's because I've got three kittens fighting for my attention. I'm really sorry.


SGT Hawkens117 #135 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:12 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15778 battles
  • 680
  • [SMORG]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 23 March 2017 - 05:56 AM, said:

It's fine the way it is. Smaller target than the E5's.

The E5s hatch is stronger.



SGT Hawkens117 #136 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:15 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15778 battles
  • 680
  • [SMORG]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostBig Yeash, on 23 March 2017 - 11:12 AM, said:

 

Wikipedia is not a source. It's a reference publication that contains sources.

 

By which logic, you can't say that it is right.

yes it can be classified as a source because as much as people hate on the site the site has its information checked and if there is something on there that may or may not be wrong it will say citation needed. 



Gigantic Owl #137 Posted 23 March 2017 - 02:24 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21346 battles
  • 11,426
  • [7F]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostSGT Hawkens117, on 23 March 2017 - 08:15 AM, said:

yes it can be classified as a source because as much as people hate on the site the site has its information checked and if there is something on there that may or may not be wrong it will say citation needed. 

 

Nope. It is not a source itself since incorrect information can easily be slipped in by trolls or people that are unknowledgeable.

It is a hub for sources though which is very convenient, but Wikipedia itself is not a source.


 

An actual gameplay expert

 

Check out my guides on the bunker.  http://thebunker.fre...ide-compilation


SGT Hawkens117 #138 Posted 24 March 2017 - 10:44 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15778 battles
  • 680
  • [SMORG]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostGigantic Owl, on 23 March 2017 - 02:24 PM, said:

 

Nope. It is not a source itself since incorrect information can easily be slipped in by trolls or people that are unknowledgeable.

It is a hub for sources though which is very convenient, but Wikipedia itself is not a source.

and as I have listed if there is a new thing placed then it will say citation needed.



NightOfDeaths #139 Posted 24 March 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21377 battles
  • 12,330
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View PostGigantic Owl, on 23 March 2017 - 08:24 AM, said:

 

Nope. It is not a source itself since incorrect information can easily be slipped in by trolls or people that are unknowledgeable.

It is a hub for sources though which is very convenient, but Wikipedia itself is not a source.

 

I've used wikipedia for information :trollface:

 

 

Works well. Just don't cite it.


 Screw my elders!!!!

World of Tanks a game where it's 1 versus 29. 15 reds trying to kill you and 14 greens trying to support them. The yellows are your only hope. For signature and stats visit http://wotinfo.net/en/player-stats

2 & 3 MoEs

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users