Jump to content


Who else loves the t34/100?


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

LoganX891 #21 Posted 21 April 2018 - 07:44 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 30139 battles
  • 546
  • [CORVS]
  • Member since:
    05-17-2016

View PostBruin766, on 21 April 2018 - 12:04 PM, said:

Almost 40 battles.  TVP VTU’s not so bad.  Got to treat it more a mobile TD with a good damage roll.  The armor will bounce a few shots.  I was going to free XP to the tier IX but its not so bad.  

 

After playing in it for a bit of time, don't you think it is a closer fit with tier 7?

 

 


Bruin766 #22 Posted 23 April 2018 - 06:59 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 41871 battles
  • 285
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014

View PostLoganX891, on 21 April 2018 - 11:44 AM, said:

 

After playing in it for a bit of time, don't you think it is a closer fit with tier 7?

 

it’s definitely a tier 8.  If it had a shorter reload time this tank would be OP.  I have a T30 and treat this the same.

XEboi #23 Posted 30 April 2018 - 04:23 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23113 battles
  • 1,606
  • Member since:
    12-05-2015

View PostLoganX891, on 19 April 2018 - 09:21 PM, said:

 

 

This is pure wishful thinking on my part, so please just humor me for a second. It would have been interesting to have a side branch off from the T-25 to a tier 6 T-34-85 that could also mount the 75 mm Škoda A18 (s automatickým nabíjením).This would have given us one more tech tree tier 6 to house crews in while training them. From the T-34-85, research could have been done to get to the T-34-100 at tier 7 we now have. At that point, the branch would dead end. The TVP VTU Koncept could have been at tier 7 in a strait move up from the T-25. I’m sorry, but the Koncept seems more like a tier 7 to me, not a tier 8. With the tree branching sideways to a T-34-85, it would have made an easier grind to the T-34-100 and a much better grind in the Koncept to a tier 8 tank, perhaps a T-54 variant. As I said, wishful thinking on my part.

 Off the Tier 6 I'd love to see Czech is2 or maybe make it a premium 



Funktastic Ed #24 Posted 04 February 2019 - 06:53 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18996 battles
  • 700
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

Basically a T-34 with a 100mm gun, far from being enough to compete even at tier VIII, not talking about tier IX where you just don't exist.

 

Bad gun handling and that 5° russian gun depression (buffed on soviet line….WG ?) to make it even more frustrating and unpleasant to play, really it is only good on flat terrain… and the only flat maps are cities and you have no armor.

 

It is a good tank...until you find out what is a real good tank…


Edited by Funktastic Ed, 05 February 2019 - 02:17 PM.

"Idiots dare everything, that's how you really know they are."

Albapfalzd3 #25 Posted 13 February 2019 - 01:11 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22503 battles
  • 2,829
  • Member since:
    04-07-2017

View PostFunktastic Ed, on 04 February 2019 - 06:53 PM, said:

Basically a T-34 with a 100mm gun, far from being enough to compete even at tier VIII, not talking about tier IX where you just don't exist.

 

Bad gun handling and that 5° russian gun depression (buffed on soviet line….WG ?) to make it even more frustrating and unpleasant to play, really it is only good on flat terrain… and the only flat maps are cities and you have no armor.

 

It is a good tank...until you find out what is a real good tank…

 

It is a T-34-88 at Tier VII with one caveat, the armor just doesn't stand up nearly as well at Tier VII as it does at VI. You can have some monster matches when top Tier and it can perform at VIII but like you said at IX it just doesn't stack up at all. Recent Ace Tanker match I had.

 

 

Roy



Orbtastic1 #26 Posted 10 July 2019 - 10:04 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 41919 battles
  • 2,048
  • [UK]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

I am not really enjoying it. I free XP'd to the 100mm after 2 games stock (wow). Doesn't help that I only had a 1.5 skill crew so used some multipliers.

 

The aim time is horrendous. The gun depression isn't great either. I'll be glad when I'm done with this tank. Nobody fears you at all, although the odd tier 6 does a runner when you hit them for ~270.



XEboi #27 Posted 11 July 2019 - 09:36 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23113 battles
  • 1,606
  • Member since:
    12-05-2015
For some odd reason it got nuffed a few patches ago used to be abit better

I still like mine have some good games in it

Ragyoo #28 Posted 11 July 2019 - 10:52 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 26587 battles
  • 496
  • Member since:
    12-27-2016

Hello,

 

I like all T-34 and this one is the best gun and one of the fastest.

 

Remember getting one pascucci sneaking undetected behind enemy lines as fast as a snakebite.



JPollocksNo5 #29 Posted 12 July 2019 - 01:51 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 34194 battles
  • 268
  • [UK]
  • Member since:
    05-16-2014

I got one shot by a Conq.

 

I liked it for a bit, then kept it, not played it for ages.

 

No armour. Quite nippy sometimes.

 

For the gun to work, you either need to play it like a TD and hide and snipe (but it's innacurate) or be a nasty shitbag and hide in a group.

 

The gun is great when it hits but when you're up against a hidey T29 you're toast.

 

Forget anything at tier 8 and above, you're going to get smashed about by lights.



Orbtastic1 #30 Posted 14 July 2019 - 03:06 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 41919 battles
  • 2,048
  • [UK]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

Finished the grind and now I'm on the TVP VTU, at leas the gun handling is ok on that.

 

The T34/100 is pretty poor, it literally has nothing going for it as a Tier 7 other than the gun and the gun handling is trash. Like,literally let's make a really bad tank and give it one redeeming feature but let's still make it unplayable. It's reasonably quick in a straight line but that's about it, handles like a bus,turns like a bus, traverse is awful, bloom is awful, aim time is KV2-esque. Gun depression awful.

 

I got ammo racked in it once by an ISU when I was on 400 health and aiming at something else anyway so didn't care. I thought I'd get ammo racked more often but even without safe stowage it never felt like a problem. I had a couple of annoying Tier 5 T34s pinging me with apcr ever 2-3 seconds that damaged it but only got blown the once.



LacqueredBacon #31 Posted 07 August 2019 - 07:39 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 34887 battles
  • 6,151
  • Member since:
    02-02-2015
I like it but it isn't a keeper for me.


 


Nonstopmaximum #32 Posted 01 September 2019 - 02:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19079 battles
  • 88
  • [ICE]
  • Member since:
    04-11-2017
Very fun tank. Free XPed just for it yesterday since I've grown fond of the T-34 and variants. It does not disappoint once fully upgraded and equipped. Getting lots of 3-5 kill 2000-3500 damage mastery games in it and it's fun putting 100 damage into wiggling far away T95s sides with HE. I'm surprised so many people dislike the tank but hey, this should be an easy 3 mark to show off. Otherwise, only complaint here is the low ammo capacity which can be emptied quickly on wasted shots and long games.

3 Marks of Excellence

 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCB0e35pjJf11jMF0rkbCBjg

 


Nonstopmaximum #33 Posted 08 September 2019 - 04:48 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 19079 battles
  • 88
  • [ICE]
  • Member since:
    04-11-2017

Three marked in a week and 130 games.

 

 

 


3 Marks of Excellence

 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCB0e35pjJf11jMF0rkbCBjg

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users