Jump to content


World of Tanks Console - The Nameless


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
275 replies to this topic

mhogee #41 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:41 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27725 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014
can we give it the S tank Siege mode PLEASE~!!!

HeroicBanzai888 #42 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:45 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 30615 battles
  • 129
  • [LORDY]
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013

View PostKoneko Da Best, on 21 June 2017 - 10:35 PM, said:

the only people that were crying for nerfs were the same people who don't even want it in the game due to it being anime related smh

 

​That is clearly not true, I have no issue with it being anime.  But I do think for the good of the game in the long run tanks should be fairly balanced.  Of course some will better than others.  But normally if a tank has great armour it will be lesser in other areas.  Or a great gun like waffle that people cry about its balanced as it has paper armour that you can tear apart with HE.  What people were rightfully concerned about was it had great armour, great speed for a heavy with all that amour and a great gun.  You know the old saying "You can't have your cake and eat it".  It would just be silly if one tank in a tier was good at most things.  Why would anyone play the other tanks?

 

WG you did what was good for the game in the long run instead of going for a quick cash grab.  You have my vote of confidence, it would of looked really bad if they did another OP tank so soon after the last mistake they made with the PC storm over the Chrysler.​

 

Also the nerfs are very tame, I would of nerfed it more but it shows they do care about having a healthy game.  It would be pretty silly if the game broke down to everyone just playing one uber tank.


Edited by HeroicBanzai888, 21 June 2017 - 10:47 PM.


KawaiiKonChan #43 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:46 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 3360 battles
  • 2,660
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2013
Wouldn't a speed nerf over an armor nerf been a better idea? It's a heavy after all.

            Wolfie: Your favorite tsundere gamer. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


AnonymousHobo69 #44 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 26784 battles
  • 3,550
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013

View Postmhogee, on 21 June 2017 - 04:41 PM, said:

can we give it the S tank Siege mode PLEASE~!!!

 

What? No. What are you on about? Just stop.

100% Damage Standing

Renault G1

T-34-2

Jagdpanzer IV

VK 30.02D


BrogueOne #45 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Major

  • Supertest - PS4
  • 12980 battles
  • 3,154
  • [ELDER]
  • Member since:
    01-07-2016
They nerfed the armor and the gun depression because everybody was terrified it was going to be overpowered when it came to console. Well, overpowered was the crutch that got used when they couldn't win an argument over them being anime tanks anyway.

Don't forget that the gun stats are probably identical. That means that it's going on sale with near best-in-class gun handling and DPM!!!

I repeat: BEST-IN-CLASS GUN HANDLING AND DPM!!!!!

Koneko Da Best #46 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19102 battles
  • 153
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-03-2014

View PostHeroicBanzai888, on 21 June 2017 - 04:45 PM, said:

 

​That is clearly not true, I have no issue with it being anime.  But I do think for the good of the game in the long run tanks should be fairly balanced.  Of course some will better than others.  But normally if a tank has great armour it will be lesser in other areas.  Or a great gun like waffle that people cry about its balanced as it has paper armour that you can tear apart with HE.  What people were rightfully concerned about was it had great armour, great speed for a heavy with all that amour and a great gun.  You know the old saying "You can't have your cake and eat it".  It would just be silly if one tank in a tier was good at most things.  Why would anyone play the other tanks?

 

WG you did what was good for the game in the long run instead of going for a quick cash grab.  You have my vote of confidence, it would of looked really bad if they did another OP tank so soon after the last mistake they made with the PC storm over the Chrysler.​

 

yeah lets be honest when has WGW been so concerned with balance on new premium tanks I mean look at the Tiger 131

AnonymousHobo69 #47 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 26784 battles
  • 3,550
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013

View PostKawaiiKonChan, on 21 June 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

Wouldn't a speed nerf over an armor nerf been a better idea? It's a heavy after all.

 

Are you asking WGW to make sensible balance changes? :teethhappy:

100% Damage Standing

Renault G1

T-34-2

Jagdpanzer IV

VK 30.02D


Koneko Da Best #48 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:49 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19102 battles
  • 153
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-03-2014

View PostKawaiiKonChan, on 21 June 2017 - 04:46 PM, said:

Wouldn't a speed nerf over an armor nerf been a better idea? It's a heavy after all.

 

I think that would have been a much better decision too

Corporal Derpy #49 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:49 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 18482 battles
  • 16,325
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostRarefication, on 21 June 2017 - 10:40 PM, said:

I'm no expert, but I suggested earlier today that WG should leave the armor and speed as is, but give the tank bad gun depression to make up for it. But to nerf the armor and give it bad gun depression seems at bit extreme. 

 

Armour and speed could have done with changes, I'd honestly have thought if they were to change anything to the gun then it would have been the soft stats instead of the depression for the sides. 

I'd have settled with them making it bad gun depression but keeping the rest, I'll make it work regardless but it seems this way they've went half and half instead of actually changing what needed changing.


Garage : 

'Imagine if this forum had only players who actually win more than lose trying to tell others how to play. Would be the best forum ever. Instead, we have a bunch of morons who lose more often than not trying to tell their betters how to play their tanks.'

'The term "casual gamer" is actually not accurate enough anymore to describe what the larger market is like. They want the illusion of accomplishment, but not the effort associated with it. The players aren't really doing anything, something else is doing it for them, and the player takes the credit for it.


mhogee #50 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:50 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27725 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

View PostAnonymousHobo69, on 21 June 2017 - 05:47 PM, said:

 

What? No. What are you on about? Just stop.

 

its a joke 

chill hobo



Koneko Da Best #51 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:51 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19102 battles
  • 153
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-03-2014
clearly the spur to actually balance this tank is based on the hatred from the community towards the fact it's a fantasy tank from a game and anime otherwise we would see better balancing on other tanks and not this one rare exception

Rarefication #52 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:52 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 14789 battles
  • 9,135
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013

View PostCorporal Derpy, on 21 June 2017 - 06:49 PM, said:

 

Armour and speed could have done with changes, I'd honestly have thought if they were to change anything to the gun then it would have been the soft stats instead of the depression for the sides. 

I'd have settled with them making it bad gun depression but keeping the rest, I'll make it work regardless but it seems this way they've went half and half instead of actually changing what needed changing.

 

Yeah, your suggestions work too. 

kyo0okid #53 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:54 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 2958 battles
  • 91
  • Member since:
    03-18-2017

i'm ok with the armor but the guns depression nerf not a good way to balance the tank

everyone was complain about the armor and gun handling  not guns depression:coin:

will I'm ok with anything

 



KawaiiKonChan #54 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:54 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 3360 battles
  • 2,660
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2013

View PostAnonymousHobo69, on 21 June 2017 - 06:47 PM, said:

 

Are you asking WGW to make sensible balance changes? :teethhappy:

 

That's true. Sorry, Wolfie was thinking reasonably...

            Wolfie: Your favorite tsundere gamer. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


IAmJonReaper #55 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:55 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11662 battles
  • 1,131
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013
Everyones angry about the gun depression over the side of the tank? Lol you gonna poke ridges sideways cause it's always been just 5 over the front.

 

 


mhogee #56 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:56 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27725 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

hmmm I think I will still buy it

 

I make 5 degrees work on a charioteer 

heck 3 degrees on the KV85 works



mhogee #57 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:56 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27725 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

View PostIAmJonReaper, on 21 June 2017 - 05:55 PM, said:

Everyones angry about the gun depression over the side of the tank? Lol you gonna poke ridges sideways cause it's always been just 5 over the front.

 

yeah this was the best news today... not over nerfed!! my wallet is still interested

WrathofAchilles #58 Posted 21 June 2017 - 10:57 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 20276 battles
  • 7,088
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014
This is completely stupid.

I can totally understand a nerf to speed as well as minor soft stat changes. But why are we keeping the gun depression as well as nerfing armor everywhere else? The horrid gun depression was a good trade off for the armor as it would force you to constantly reposition or expose yourself more to engage targets.

These changes will effectively make this tank a fast sniping tank. Because that's what this game needs, a heavy that encourages chai sniping.

The Senpai of Overwhelming Despair and Tragedy

232nd Kuromorimine Mechanized Division [KMD] Commanding Officer

"Spiral, spin, ride the whirlwind. Knowing when the drumming stops, There'll be no second dance."


mhogee #59 Posted 21 June 2017 - 11:00 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 27725 battles
  • 1,537
  • Member since:
    02-04-2014

View PostWrathofAchilles, on 21 June 2017 - 05:57 PM, said:

This is completely stupid.

I can totally understand a nerf to speed as well as minor soft stat changes. But why are we keeping the gun depression as well as nerfing armor everywhere else? The horrid gun depression was a good trade off for the armor as it would force you to constantly reposition or expose yourself more to engage targets.

These changes will effectively make this tank a fast sniping tank. Because that's what this game needs, a heavy that encourages chai sniping.

 

could've been worst if they nerfed speed and or DPM/GUN

 

it was always 5 over the front no biggy 



KawaiiKonChan #60 Posted 21 June 2017 - 11:00 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 3360 battles
  • 2,660
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2013

View PostWrathofAchilles, on 21 June 2017 - 06:57 PM, said:

This is completely stupid.

I can totally understand a nerf to speed as well as minor soft stat changes. But why are we keeping the gun depression as well as nerfing armor everywhere else? The horrid gun depression was a good trade off for the armor as it would force you to constantly reposition or expose yourself more to engage targets.

These changes will effectively make this tank a fast sniping tank. Because that's what this game needs, a heavy that encourages chai sniping.

 

As long as the animu haters don't have to see it, right? That's Wolfie's theory. 

            Wolfie: Your favorite tsundere gamer. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users