Jump to content


about this TVP VTU Koncept..... and WG lying about MM


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

smotedown318 #1 Posted 12 July 2017 - 07:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34333 battles
  • 152
  • [YOMA]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

first off I don't normally do rants but here I go.  So the TVP.... it's not the worst tank I have ever played (but close) and the only real problem with the tank I have (besides the turret, gun and speed) is that the reticule is off about 2' to high, (the shells fall short)  But what really really annoys me about this tank and why I am calling WG liars is the MM this thing gets,  remember there post a while back about if you are not top tier 2 games in a row,  that the MM will keep you in the que and give you a top tier game?  Well that's not true after suspecting it I started writing down my match tiers and this is what I got.

TVP and fatherland..... X, X, IX, IX, X, X, VIII, IX, VIII, XIII, 

just TVP....... IX, X, X, VIII, IX, X, X, VIII?, IX, IX, VIII, VIII, X, VIII, X, IX, 

next day TVP......... X, X, VIII(they had 7 we had 4) X, IX, IX, X, IX, X, VIII, VIII, IX, X, VIII. 

All que times where less then 30 seconds B.T.W. so any comment WG?


51 total. 3 marked tanks --- M4, M4A3E8, M4A3E2, T20, T69, T54E1,  pershing, M46 patton, M24 chaffee, T71 DA, M41 Walker Bulldog, T14, T29, T32, T34, M103, T110E5, M18 Hellcat, T25/2, T30, ------ Cromwell, Comet, Conquer, FV215B,  ------ AMX ELC bis, AMX CDC, lorraine 40 t, AMX 50 100, ------ VK 16.02 Leopard, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Indien-panzer, Leopard prototype A, Waffenträger auf Pz. IV, Tiger 1 hammer, tiger II, E75, E100,------ Motherland, object 430 version II, KV-2, KV-3, fatherland IS-3A, KV-4, IS-3, T-10, ST-I,  IS-7, ------ Skoda T 25, ------ Type 59,

RUNNINGDUDE1 #2 Posted 12 July 2017 - 07:25 PM

    Major

  • Supertest - Xbox 360
  • 23941 battles
  • 9,748
  • Member since:
    11-08-2013

The numbers in the queue will determine have an affect on the time and the match up.



jkblackhawk #3 Posted 12 July 2017 - 07:28 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 59868 battles
  • 1,124
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
I don't think they have the proper restrictions yet mm broken. Period

Y5O5ER1U5 #4 Posted 12 July 2017 - 08:24 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 26591 battles
  • 1,961
  • Member since:
    09-11-2015

"remember there post a while back about if you are not top tier 2 games in a row,  that the MM will keep you in the que and give you a top tier game?"

 

Can you post a link to where WG said this?



Tricky Rik 36 #5 Posted 12 July 2017 - 08:38 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 23156 battles
  • 590
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostY5O5ER1U5, on 12 July 2017 - 09:24 PM, said:

"remember there post a while back about if you are not top tier 2 games in a row,  that the MM will keep you in the que and give you a top tier game?"

 

Can you post a link to where WG said this?

 

Yes, I read this too.  I believe it was Max Chaos who posted it, about a month ago. 

smotedown318 #6 Posted 13 July 2017 - 06:02 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34333 battles
  • 152
  • [YOMA]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostY5O5ER1U5, on 12 July 2017 - 02:24 PM, said:

"remember there post a while back about if you are not top tier 2 games in a row,  that the MM will keep you in the que and give you a top tier game?"

 

Can you post a link to where WG said this?

"The Matchmaker Explained"  ---contentWG

bla bla yate yate here you go 

"Here's what you don't know: if the matchmaker finds a player in the upper half of their Battle Tier range (near the bottom of the team list) for two consecutive battles, in the following battle, they'll be placed into a match in the lower half of their Battle Tier (near the top of the team list) for that vehicle. This helps prevent players from having streaks of games where they are placed at the bottom of their team list". 

thanks WG this system works so very very well, this is also why people think you lie to us.

 

Also has anyone else noticed that this website has started using the same servers as the game?  it takes forever for pages to load for me.  Na must be my ISP  I mean It's only this website that is doing it and it can't be WG's fault.

 

 

View PostRUNNINGDUDE1, on 12 July 2017 - 01:25 PM, said:

The numbers in the queue will determine have an affect on the time and the match up.

less than 30 seconds......less than 30 seconds......... LESS THAN 30 SECONDS, is in qued - loading - start match - all in less than 1 min total,   In the few game that I had a chance to see what was in the que there were always between upper teens - 30 + tier VIII's in the que


51 total. 3 marked tanks --- M4, M4A3E8, M4A3E2, T20, T69, T54E1,  pershing, M46 patton, M24 chaffee, T71 DA, M41 Walker Bulldog, T14, T29, T32, T34, M103, T110E5, M18 Hellcat, T25/2, T30, ------ Cromwell, Comet, Conquer, FV215B,  ------ AMX ELC bis, AMX CDC, lorraine 40 t, AMX 50 100, ------ VK 16.02 Leopard, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Indien-panzer, Leopard prototype A, Waffenträger auf Pz. IV, Tiger 1 hammer, tiger II, E75, E100,------ Motherland, object 430 version II, KV-2, KV-3, fatherland IS-3A, KV-4, IS-3, T-10, ST-I,  IS-7, ------ Skoda T 25, ------ Type 59,

sumo1234 #7 Posted 20 September 2018 - 08:45 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 62906 battles
  • 682
  • Member since:
    09-13-2015

I am playing tier 10 in this tank 80 % of the time,the mm sucks on this tank.My very first game was a tier 10.

 

 

 

 


 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users