Jump to content


MBT-70/KPz 70


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Brick S0lid #1 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:01 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14262 battles
  • 4,403
  • Member since:
    06-12-2014

Why can't we add these to the game? I had thought these tanks had composite armor which made them a no no for this game but supposedly they only have spaced armor consisting of different layers of steel. The gun is just a longer version of the 152 used by the T49 light tank so nothing wrong with that. Balancing these tanks would probably be the hardest thing though as they feature autoloaders, great mobility and good armor with a gun that if it pens would deal 700 plus damage. 

Link to wiki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBT-70

 

I want WG. I want.


Edited by Brick S0lid, 20 September 2017 - 12:02 PM.

Artillery punishes flankers, not campers.

 

3700+Wn8. 100 tanks with 3 MoE including 29 tier X's on my main account.

 


Stanky Janky995-x #2 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:16 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 18742 battles
  • 1,878
  • Member since:
    04-18-2014
informative read. +1
WarGaming Auto-Response AI

DutchCupid62 #3 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:43 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 11767 battles
  • 3,874
  • [NLPZR]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
Would you want a tank with E-100 armor, Jgdpanzer E-100 pen, 700 damage and almost the same mobility as an T49.

Balancing this would be a pain in the [edited].

NLPZR Dutch clan recruitment thread:

http://forum-console...-clan-xbox-one/

 


BigHundy #4 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:54 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 9740 battles
  • 3,892
  • [FCCM]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2016

View PostDutchCupid62, on 20 September 2017 - 12:43 PM, said:

Would you want a tank with E-100 armor, Jgdpanzer E-100 pen, 700 damage and almost the same mobility as an T49.

Balancing this would be a pain in the [edited].

 

Every real life tank that was put into this game doesn't have it's real world stats.

Chieftain, anybody?


I spent half my money on gambling, alcohol, and cheap women. The other half I wasted -  W.C. Fields

 

On the last day of your life, don't forget to die.

 


Brick S0lid #5 Posted 20 September 2017 - 12:55 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14262 battles
  • 4,403
  • Member since:
    06-12-2014

View PostDutchCupid62, on 21 September 2017 - 12:43 AM, said:

Would you want a tank with E-100 armor, Jgdpanzer E-100 pen, 700 damage and almost the same mobility as an T49.

Balancing this would be a pain in the [edited].

I mean the armor isn't that good. Front is spaced armor. Sides and rear would be trash. The gun would have bad pen by tier X standards. Could have bad accuracy with decent gun handling. Soft stats can be used to rein in the mobility etc


Edited by Brick S0lid, 20 September 2017 - 12:56 PM.

Artillery punishes flankers, not campers.

 

3700+Wn8. 100 tanks with 3 MoE including 29 tier X's on my main account.

 


USSWISCONSIN94-x #6 Posted 20 September 2017 - 10:58 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12958 battles
  • 28,628
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Bump as i hope we do get this. Looks fun.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


W 4 L K U R E #7 Posted 20 September 2017 - 10:59 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 37624 battles
  • 4,092
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014
Inb4 Jocco

​My FV215b Review is here: 

​WOTC 2018- The emperor has no clothes!


Naughty Coin #8 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:01 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 26951 battles
  • 4,236
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

View PostW 4 L K U R E, on 20 September 2017 - 05:59 PM, said:

Inb4 Jocco

 

In2w8 for Joco

 

 

 

 


RagingxMarmoset #9 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:07 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 10249 battles
  • 6,667
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014
There were a couple prototypes built and I think one of them had marginal RHA. It also used the L7 gun so it'd basically be an American Leopard 1.

"Talent is a pursued interest. Anything that you're willing to practice, you can do." - Bob Ross

 


Batico Yuuki #10 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:09 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3137 battles
  • 183
  • Member since:
    02-26-2014
I want it! and I want it now! :izmena:

greyweasel UK-x #11 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:13 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 18630 battles
  • 1,746
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013
It's in Blitz although the German one had a 120mm gun. And the assisted mechanized loader wouldn't be an issue since we have the IS-3A already.

USSWISCONSIN94-x #12 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:24 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12958 battles
  • 28,628
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View Postgreyweasel UK, on 20 September 2017 - 06:13 PM, said:

It's in Blitz although the German one had a 120mm gun. And the assisted mechanized loader wouldn't be an issue since we have the IS-3A already.

 

Would be nice to see though. Though i wouldn't put it at tier 9.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


SlagInGristle-x #13 Posted 20 September 2017 - 11:26 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 40310 battles
  • 4,139
  • [6SIC6]
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Blitz gets everything 1st it seems..... just wait a while.

Brick S0lid #14 Posted 21 September 2017 - 02:39 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14262 battles
  • 4,403
  • Member since:
    06-12-2014

View Postgreyweasel UK, on 21 September 2017 - 11:13 AM, said:

It's in Blitz although the German one had a 120mm gun. And the assisted mechanized loader wouldn't be an issue since we have the IS-3A already.

The Germans proposed to mount a smoothbore 120mm. WoT doesnt like smoothbores so we would have to stick to the 152 or a 105 L7.


Artillery punishes flankers, not campers.

 

3700+Wn8. 100 tanks with 3 MoE including 29 tier X's on my main account.

 


USSWISCONSIN94-x #15 Posted 21 September 2017 - 03:43 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12958 battles
  • 28,628
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostBrick S0lid, on 20 September 2017 - 09:39 PM, said:

The Germans proposed to mount a smoothbore 120mm. WoT doesnt like smoothbores so we would have to stick to the 152 or a 105 L7.

Why not have both 152 and the L7? Would be interesting to see


http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Bibo1GerUk-x #16 Posted 21 September 2017 - 08:21 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 30199 battles
  • 5,162
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014
The tanks are in AW and WT. They're not Autoloaders in the usual sense. My impression from AW: You shoot, do nice damage and then wait a long time till it reloads. More like a KV-2 SU-152. Armour-wise anything of equal tier will probably wreck it.

Remember, it's just a game!

My little Youtube channel aka YeOldeGamer: https://www.youtube....xVCaFCLg/videos


xX8DeSTRoYeR8Xx #17 Posted 21 September 2017 - 06:08 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 19796 battles
  • 473
  • [ACE]
  • Member since:
    01-29-2016
Saw this beast in some videos from WT and it seams pretty nice. I wish WGCB would implement more console exclusive tanks, like this one. Option for the 105 or 152 sounds pretty cool




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users