Jump to content


FV216b getting replaced?

premium tanks adjustment FV215b

  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

Unkempt #41 Posted 09 January 2018 - 02:53 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14177 battles
  • 3,351
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    01-20-2016

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 30 December 2017 - 03:30 PM, said:

It is better.

 

It's better at brawling with it's lower plate, but its turret and gun don't compare. 

 

"Rommel, you magnificent bastard, I read your BOOK!"


Muttz v2 #42 Posted 09 January 2018 - 04:54 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 24234 battles
  • 1,153
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014

View Postbutsubutsu, on 09 January 2018 - 12:48 PM, said:

I respect your opinion and in the end I actually do not care that much, I just feel that grinding the Conqueror three times for three different tier X heavies seems a bit too much. 

 

​well dont grind it 3 times then. pick the one you want and go for it.. but if your a gotta have them all kinda guy then that is less grinding than splitting the line lower. not that i think 3 tier tens off one tank is a good idea but it does happen in the french light to med line. 

personaly i think pairing it up with its sister tank the 183 would sort of make sense. but in the end i dont care what they do aslong as its not removed.



butsubutsu #43 Posted 09 January 2018 - 05:44 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19140 battles
  • 2,710
  • [APEX2]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2016

View PostMuttz v2, on 09 January 2018 - 04:54 PM, said:

 

​well dont grind it 3 times then. pick the one you want and go for it.. but if your a gotta have them all kinda guy then that is less grinding than splitting the line lower. not that i think 3 tier tens off one tank is a good idea but it does happen in the french light to med line. 

personaly i think pairing it up with its sister tank the 183 would sort of make sense. but in the end i dont care what they do aslong as its not removed.

 

Of course I want them all, that is to me a part of the game. I do not like that the TigerP splits into too many branches and I guess that the same seems to be true about the French at some stage. Three British tier X from one tier IX is just horrible planning from WG, in that case your idea about sharing tier X on the same branch with the sister 183 is way better. 

USSWISCONSIN94 #44 Posted 09 January 2018 - 07:25 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 7408 battles
  • 24,318
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostUnkempt, on 09 January 2018 - 08:53 AM, said:

 

It's better at brawling with it's lower plate, but its turret and gun don't compare. 

Turret overall is still better. And i'll trade a slightly "worse" gun for the better. Conq only has the gun which. Not much else going for it


http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


BigHundy #45 Posted 09 January 2018 - 09:59 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 5908 battles
  • 2,020
  • [HQ]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2016

View PostUnkempt, on 09 January 2018 - 02:53 PM, said:

 

It's better at brawling with it's lower plate, but its turret and gun don't compare. 

 

The stats are only marginally better.

m103 can snap shot like a boss, too.

 

And that lfp/ufp is so troll.

 

I felt like the m103 had better hp/t as well, but I could be wrong.

T110E5> Chieftain

m103 > Conq imo.

T32 > Caernarvon

T29 > well you get the idea.

 

AMERICA!!!!


98% of system problems are user related.


Chimonakimi #46 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:27 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 23187 battles
  • 4,052
  • [_MLG_]
  • Member since:
    04-28-2016

View PostBigHundy, on 09 January 2018 - 09:59 PM, said:

 

The stats are only marginally better.

m103 can snap shot like a boss, too.

 

And that lfp/ufp is so troll.

 

I felt like the m103 had better hp/t as well, but I could be wrong.

T110E5> Chieftain

m103 > Conq imo.

T32 > Caernarvon

T29 > well you get the idea.

 

AMERICA!!!!

 

This is wrong, and you should feel bad



USSWISCONSIN94 #47 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:31 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 7408 battles
  • 24,318
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostChimonakimi, on 10 January 2018 - 06:27 PM, said:

 

This is wrong, and you should feel bad

 

Both are overall bad.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Wroclaw #48 Posted 11 January 2018 - 05:49 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 30689 battles
  • 2,544
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 11 January 2018 - 12:31 AM, said:

 

Both are overall bad.

 

you didnt like the T32 ?

 

it might not dominate tier 8 like the T29 does at tier 7, but i wouldnt say its as weak as the caernarvon is. thats a genuinely weak tier 8.



Lokeen75 #49 Posted 14 January 2018 - 04:34 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 2110 battles
  • 21
  • [STRM]
  • Member since:
    04-05-2017

View PostxxHalogen, on 30 December 2017 - 09:22 PM, said:

what's an FV216b ? :trollface:

 

Clearly a typo....as clear as your lack of humor lol





Also tagged with premium, tanks, adjustment, FV215b

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users