Jump to content


Okay...I'm finally crying "Foul" on you WG!

MM

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

TheStallionM4ng #41 Posted 12 January 2018 - 10:57 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14707 battles
  • 1,262
  • Member since:
    02-16-2014

View PostBULLPUPBAKERST1, on 13 January 2018 - 07:26 AM, said:

 

really?  I'm at three years and I haven't seen this regularly, just recently. I see platoons mucking it up, but that was not the case in this battle. There's not platoon pressure on that battle. 

It has plagued me through my wot career. I posted my dissatisfaction about it in a number of long forgotten threads then gave up.

Most of the time the teams could have the same amount of top tier tanks by moving two from one team to the other.



VKSheridan #42 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:10 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 18461 battles
  • 2,154
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostTheStallionM4ng, on 12 January 2018 - 04:57 PM, said:

It has plagued me through my wot career. I posted my dissatisfaction about it in a number of long forgotten threads then gave up.

Most of the time the teams could have the same amount of top tier tanks by moving two from one team to the other.

 

Like BullPupBakerStreet, I see it but most times it can be explained by platoons or off hour server population.  I agree, spreading the mix to reduce the imbalance makes sense but I think MM sometimes burps into a convulsion every now and then and bammo, you get a really goofy line up like this one.  Whether red or green, ya just have take it in stride.  Some of the roughest challenges netted me the fondest memories.  “Easy kills” just never stand out when we’re all comparing our most high pulse battles.



Pit Friend #43 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:18 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 27722 battles
  • 13,053
  • [PTATO]
  • Member since:
    07-14-2014
I’ve got a screenshot somewhere where the red team had 13 Heavy tanks and the green team had none. Yeah that was a special game. :sceptic:

I hope to one day be wealthy enough to be considered eccentric rather than just plain nuts.  


USSWISCONSIN94 #44 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 8964 battles
  • 25,270
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
While not truely bad like this. Being one of 2 Tier 7 light AND top tier tanks before tier 10 lights still to this day makes me laugh.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


JustinOfTheUSA #45 Posted 13 January 2018 - 02:57 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 15995 battles
  • 3,249
  • [A7CAV]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostBULLPUPBAKERST1, on 11 January 2018 - 08:50 PM, said:

I'm not actually mad or salty, but this tank weight Matchmaking isn't cutting it. I'm not suggesting skill based matchmaking, but I am suggesting more priority be given to "same tier" matchmaking.  

 

I didn't even notice until the battle was over because I was in a light tank and I really didn't care what types of tanks were on either team for my purposes.  7 tier tens to 3 tier tens? I don't even see how platoons could have caused this one. I'm ashamed that I couldn't carry against the object 263 after I killed the t95 :trollface:, but seriously, how did the green team stand any chance on this map with that kind of tier 10 gun discrepancy?

 

 

thats ridiculous, under no circumstance should a game be matched like that, and then forumers wonder why so many of these "rigged MM" topics come up...they need to severely change MM this year, especially since the light tank tiers have changed.

 

Three new ways of match making

 

5-5-5 each tier

8-7/7-8

15

 

Also, find platoons that have the same tiers and restrict broken platoons (tier 5 with a tier 6, tier 7 with a tier 9, etc)


Regular Tanks Tanks: M41 Bulldog • T54E1 • Caernarvon • Tortoise • Indian-Pz. • VK 100.01 P • T-54 • ST-I  • T-34-1• O-Ni • Ivk 65 II

Premium Tanks: Blitzen • Freedom • T14 • Pz V/IV • Hammer  • Champion M4 • T-34-88 • Fatherland • 

Tier Tens: T110E5 • T110E3 • E-100 • IS-7

Updated February 6, 2018

PENETRATION


TheStallionM4ng #46 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:23 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14707 battles
  • 1,262
  • Member since:
    02-16-2014

View PostVKSheridan, on 13 January 2018 - 09:40 AM, said:

 

Like BullPupBakerStreet, I see it but most times it can be explained by platoons or off hour server population.  I agree, spreading the mix to reduce the imbalance makes sense but I think MM sometimes burps into a convulsion every now and then and bammo, you get a really goofy line up like this one.  Whether red or green, ya just have take it in stride.  Some of the roughest challenges netted me the fondest memories.  “Easy kills” just never stand out when we’re all comparing our most high pulse battles.

I hear what you're saying and I'm not looking for a free ride, but the dice feel loaded when you are four top tiers down in yet another losing effort.



VKSheridan #47 Posted 13 January 2018 - 02:25 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 18461 battles
  • 2,154
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostTheStallionM4ng, on 12 January 2018 - 09:23 PM, said:

I hear what you're saying and I'm not looking for a free ride, but the dice feel loaded when you are four top tiers down in yet another losing effort.

 

Amen brother, drive a T28 Proto and you get used to it.....LOL

Spexinator25 #48 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:18 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 63635 battles
  • 864
  • [KRZ8]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

View PostKebabsaurus Rex, on 12 January 2018 - 08:37 AM, said:

Seen far too many of these games in the past week or so.

 

Previously it used to be skewed by platoons, now it just seems to be skewed. 

 

I had a game with a T49 being top tier and the server population was relatively high.

 

Bingo!!!  MM and RNG:angry:





Also tagged with MM

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users