Jump to content


Would you be willing to pay for a Ultimate Edition of WoT in order to increase content?

content expanding paying free tanks wot console

  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

PLK180W #41 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:01 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 61 battles
  • 5,923
  • Member since:
    10-29-2014

View PostCyrex005, on 12 January 2018 - 09:16 PM, said:

Yours will come with a T14 with a QF 2pounder.

 

I'll take it.

 

Be a damn sight better then that 75, at least the 2-Pdr can penetrate things.


Through The Mud And Blood To The Green Fields Beyond

PLK180W #42 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:19 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 61 battles
  • 5,923
  • Member since:
    10-29-2014

How about of they made a paid version on Xbone and PS4 which included new maps, new game modes but keeping the present game as Ftp

 

(sort of like Elite : Dangerous did, but there you paid for the base game, and had to pay for the expansion that has all the cool stuff)


Edited by PLK180W, 13 January 2018 - 03:19 AM.

Through The Mud And Blood To The Green Fields Beyond

bricksmashtv2 #43 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:39 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 4974 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
if I could port my account & keep all my progress (as I've personally spent over $1000 on this game) then yes I would get behind this in a heartbeat. Otherwise no.

JatemKaa #44 Posted 13 January 2018 - 03:42 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 50703 battles
  • 2,710
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014
No. They can't fix what they already have out, what makes you think they could do any better with the new edition, especially if it has to merge with the already flawed one they have.

SlagInGristle #45 Posted 13 January 2018 - 04:39 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 31865 battles
  • 2,744
  • [6SIC6]
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

A simple disclaimer is all that is needed - do you agree to expand the game or not - for this whole pretext.

 

this is not a issue. If WG has a good reason for using more storage I’m sure it will be agreed to. More than likely it is a bandwidth or “ cost of data “ for the server side that is the restriction. 50gb x # if downloads = big bill. You know these premium vehicles and premium time are whatsoever paying or this? Right?

 

the better answer is either planning on less frequent but more dramatic updates and to have pre planned certain aspects of the game for the ability to turn them off or on. Something about lack of planning on your part doesn’t constitute a emergency on my part....


:bush:

janesta5 #46 Posted 13 January 2018 - 10:51 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 12178 battles
  • 405
  • Member since:
    12-04-2016

Simple solution stop marketing as a free to pay game charge you one £, $ ,euro to play  add in 3 days premium taa daahhh unlimited expansion space....

 

 



pr0fit0fcanabis #47 Posted 13 January 2018 - 11:42 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33639 battles
  • 7,178
  • Member since:
    06-05-2014

View PostUnceasingFour51, on 12 January 2018 - 09:06 PM, said:

 

You are assuming that is a option, when in fact it is not a option, free to play games are limited to content by all partners. same limits imposed on all.

Just curious, how do you know this is a fact? 



pr0fit0fcanabis #48 Posted 13 January 2018 - 11:44 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33639 battles
  • 7,178
  • Member since:
    06-05-2014
If it did not further split the server population and I could play on more open maps yes.  However that would not be possible unless everyone upgraded which I find highly unlikely.  

CaptainSlow6969 #49 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:58 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 13873 battles
  • 1,693
  • [R41D]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

no way they should not need more money, they have plenty of money already that i dont think is being used in the right way only for stupid over priced tank bundles and pointless tank ops.

 

They say they are not rich but they are they are wargaming console love to do some lying and the fanboys say yes to everything and believe what they say typical greed and dum playerbase that throws money that them.


WOT

Cour8ois #50 Posted 13 January 2018 - 04:07 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10173 battles
  • 561
  • [KUT]
  • Member since:
    01-10-2016

View PostUnceasingFour51, on 12 January 2018 - 08:59 PM, said:

So people keep asking about expanding the content limit on WoT console, Well the partners are not going to just allow a increase for a free to play game.

 

So the Question would be ....Are you willing to pay like $30 - $50 bucks for a WoT "Ultimate Edition"? This would put WoT into the pay to play game category and would allow them to have more downloadable content space thus increasing the games content.   

 

Now keep in mind that in doing this it MAY require you to start over from scratch. MAYBE not. But if you could transfer you current account to a ultimate edition for a fee, Would you? 

 

I am not 100% sure here, but I don't think any game has ever gone from f2p to p2p. The other way around yes. SWKTOR for example.

 

Even if they would do this it wouldn't work in this current version. It would decide the player base even more. 

 

And from a business perspective. How would you create incentive for players to buy it without giving them anything for it (e.g. extra tanks and maps).

 

Not sure what else to say. I think you are trying to create a solution for something that can be solved rather easily if WG would just pay MS the fee or talk with MS to work around it. 

You know what I would like to see...cross platform between MS and Sony



butsubutsu #51 Posted 13 January 2018 - 04:16 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19238 battles
  • 2,722
  • [APEX2]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2016

View PostCour8ois, on 13 January 2018 - 04:07 PM, said:

 

I am not 100% sure here, but I don't think any game has ever gone from f2p to p2p. The other way around yes. SWKTOR for example.

 

Even if they would do this it wouldn't work in this current version. It would decide the player base even more. 

 

And from a business perspective. How would you create incentive for players to buy it without giving them anything for it (e.g. extra tanks and maps).

 

Not sure what else to say. I think you are trying to create a solution for something that can be solved rather easily if WG would just pay MS the fee or talk with MS to work around it. 

You know what I would like to see...cross platform between MS and Sony

 

You are putting words on what I was thinking, I think you are absolutely correct. 

FateNero #52 Posted 13 January 2018 - 06:29 PM

    Captain

  • Beta Tester
  • 13725 battles
  • 1,829
  • [MOSIN]
  • Member since:
    11-07-2013
No, I’d quit the game.

Grinding: T32, Firefly, Tortoise, Ru 251(1), Jagdtiger, AMX 13 75; Elite: M4A3E8, T29(2), Centurion 7/1(1), Centurion AX, Churchill VII(3), Conqueror(1), FV215b, Chieftain, FV304, Pz. IVH,(1) Tiger P(1), Tiger(1), Tiger II(1), Maus, Ferdinand(1), ELC AMX(1), MT-25(1), KV-2, IS(1), IS-3(1), IS-7, STA-1(2), STB-1; Premium: T1E6-X, T7 Car, T1E6-X1, Locust, M41B Brazil, Ram II, T14, Knight(3), Boilermaker, TOG II*(1), FV4202 (P), Centennial(1), Pz. 38H, Pz. IID, Pz. IIJ, Aufkl. Panther(1), Pz. V/IV, Kraft's Panther, Pz. B2, Hammer, E-25, AMX CDC, T-127 , BT-SV, T-34-88, Motherland, KV-5(1). (*) MoE.

 


 


SlavicHammer187 #53 Posted 13 January 2018 - 07:31 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 8752 battles
  • 1,472
  • Member since:
    08-23-2016
Yeah because I want to forfeit $2,000 worth of Premium tanks and Lord knows how many hours of my blood, sweat and tears.........





Also tagged with content, expanding, paying, free, tanks, wot, console

4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users