Jump to content


Any updates on 4.6 Tank Balance Changes?

WGWPAIN 4.6 Balance

  • Please log in to reply
82 replies to this topic

SteampunkPagan #41 Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:20 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 81959 battles
  • 7,143
  • [HDC]
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 06:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

Even though I see it mentioned here in the forums as much as any other tank. I did not see in PAIN's post the Mercenary Stubbs mentioned any word how the performance on that is going after the neutering  in 4.6?

SPP


“Who shot him? I asked. The grey man scratched the back of his neck and said: Somebody with a gun.” ― Dashiell Hammett, Red Harvest

"Arrête! C'est ici l'empire de la Mort"

"Si vis pacem, para bellum"


DANCING FLAMES #42 Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:28 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 37138 battles
  • 965
  • [HDC]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2013

View PostSteampunkPagan, on 12 October 2018 - 02:20 PM, said:

 

Even though I see it mentioned here in the forums as much as any other tank. I did not see in PAIN's post the Mercenary Stubbs mentioned any word how the performance on that is going after the neutering  in 4.6?

SPP

I'm solo disappointed with what they did to the Stubbs. He rarely sees action anymore and when he does he has hard time rising to the occasion. 



TocFanKe4 #43 Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:28 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 18697 battles
  • 21,550
  • [GIRLS]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 06:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

Please return the VK45B to it's pre-4.1 armor model.  I might get to play with my best friend again if you do.


 

Till the Servers fall apart and burn


natedaishmaster #44 Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:47 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 21760 battles
  • 64
  • [NFTG]
  • Member since:
    07-29-2014

The E50 and TVP both got nerfs to make way for the Mercenary tanks, let’s not kid ourselves. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a Chieftan nerf as well. The E50 probably deserved its nerf but they overdid it by a lot. The TVP might have deserved its first nerf, and it was already mediocre as far as tier 10 meds go at that point. The second nerf made it completely unplayable. I hope this Czech On Track gets some noobs to play it so that they can re-evaluate that massive screw-up. The E50M nerf was a joke too. Heck, I’ll bet you that half the reason they fixed the STB was because some small person taking controlled substances decided to yolo a bunch of games in it to drag the average down.


3 MOE: Hellcat, Lycan, Sp1C, T20, M41 Bulldog, Motherland, STA 1, T95E2, Pershing, AMX 50 100, AMX 13 90, T54ltwt, T49, RU251, M46 Patton, Type 61, Leopard PTA, T54, E50, Batchat AP, Skoda T50, T10, AMX 13 105, Sheridan, M48 Patton, Leopard 1, E50M, Obj 140, Batchat 25t, TVP 50/51, IS7, AMX 50B, T110E4


Addicted2Pron #45 Posted 12 October 2018 - 02:56 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 22841 battles
  • 711
  • [PIRAI]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 11:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

Can you explain why the WZ-132-1 now has a heavy tanks rate of fire and "doesn't need adjustments"? Wargaming officially killed a 10 we put all that time and effort into earning. Now it's useless as it can't compete with other light tanks in it's teir.



Qugstav #46 Posted 12 October 2018 - 03:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28400 battles
  • 11
  • [LOONE]
  • Member since:
    01-29-2016
Fix the amx 30's... Both tanks are absolute garbage now. 

Addicted2Pron #47 Posted 12 October 2018 - 03:14 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 22841 battles
  • 711
  • [PIRAI]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015

View PostQugstav, on 12 October 2018 - 03:09 PM, said:

Fix the amx 30's... Both tanks are absolute garbage now. 

 

Yea I wanted to mention that one too but I honestly believe that Wargaming thinks it's fixed due to the armor buff it received (needs dpm fixed as well). It still sucks but wasn't hurt as badly as the 132-1.



KilledByPing #48 Posted 12 October 2018 - 04:03 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 10934 battles
  • 1,601
  • Member since:
    02-12-2017

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 02:47 PM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

Ha !

I could barely see any AMX 30er/b and the one I saw were driven by unicum players who grinded for Sharpshooter.

I literaly didnt met a single E 50 and only 1 E 50M driven by unicum player.

 

So basicaly you KEEP gathering data from UNICUM players and took it as a standard (yet again, you should NOT take into account data of 55%+-win rate players when you trying to think out to nerf a tank or not).

 

In other words - another streak of ignorance and complete incopetence. Well done. Sad to watch WG digging its own grave so fast.

 



CivilWarGoat #49 Posted 12 October 2018 - 04:29 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 21385 battles
  • 533
  • [RED1]
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

The real issue is WG has no clue on how to do data analysis.  They havent for a long time, then they went an published the "data" which they based their decision on, which ok only proves 2 things.

1.  They dont play the game.

2.  They dont know how to evaluate data.



hmsmystic #50 Posted 12 October 2018 - 08:25 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 7783 battles
  • 615
  • [ELDER]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2016
Just chiming in to ask for a shell velocity return for the AMX 30

Panzer Cmndr #51 Posted 12 October 2018 - 09:00 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 7676 battles
  • 1,326
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 06:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

So, how is the Maus performing?


German armor and German armor only, nothing else will do...


IconicNemesis #52 Posted 12 October 2018 - 09:08 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 9454 battles
  • 4,194
  • Member since:
    06-28-2013
is there even enough people playing the wz-132-1 and amx-30 and 30b to say theres nothing wrong with there performance?

 

 


Addicted2Pron #53 Posted 12 October 2018 - 09:14 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 22841 battles
  • 711
  • [PIRAI]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015
Why would you play the WZ now? Still see the AMX 30b's occasionally but yeah it's kind of a rare breed too. They were unicum tanks so they got the nerf hammer badly. I'm not sure if there's enough currently playing them to accurately gauge the performance in relation to similar tanks.

Pit Friend #54 Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:45 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 29377 battles
  • 14,766
  • [PTATO]
  • Member since:
    07-14-2014

View PostJust An0maly, on 12 October 2018 - 07:25 AM, said:

If I am reading this correctly, the TVP is officially dead then.

Great ...

 

Good thing they’re bribing players to grind the Czech line! :sceptic:

I hope to one day be wealthy enough to be considered eccentric rather than just plain nuts.  


Pit Friend #55 Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:51 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 29377 battles
  • 14,766
  • [PTATO]
  • Member since:
    07-14-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 06:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

Might want to have someone else working the monitors. 

I hope to one day be wealthy enough to be considered eccentric rather than just plain nuts.  


USSWISCONSIN94 #56 Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:55 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 9297 battles
  • 25,797
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Minus the gun. Our E50 is still better then PCs lol

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Addicted2Pron #57 Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:58 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 22841 battles
  • 711
  • [PIRAI]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015

View PostPit Friend, on 12 October 2018 - 11:51 PM, said:

 

Might want to have someone else working the monitors. 

 

Posted Image



ArmyVeteran63 #58 Posted 13 October 2018 - 12:07 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18063 battles
  • 361
  • [USAV]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 October 2018 - 11:47 AM, said:

 

The other tanks didn't need any adjustments after monitoring their performance. :honoring:

 

I guess it's safe to sell the nerfed tanks that you have not reverse then? Who where the ones doing the monerting? People who don't play their game? :facepalm:I'm glad I stopped spending money on this game 

Edited by ArmyVeteran63, 13 October 2018 - 12:11 AM.


KKNDxWarhammer #59 Posted 13 October 2018 - 12:47 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20478 battles
  • 228
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 12 October 2018 - 05:55 PM, said:

Minus the gun. Our E50 is still better then PCs lol

Having 1200 HP vs 900 HP doesn't matter when the guns are crap.



Wroclaw #60 Posted 13 October 2018 - 02:46 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 43100 battles
  • 3,852
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

WIN RATE

 

to show they are doing a good job they want this statistic to be balanced across the whole garage.

 

player ability doesnt seem to matter. tank differences dont seem to matter.

 

all that matters is that you have an equal chance to win no matter that tank you drive, or how you drive it.







Also tagged with WGWPAIN, 4.6, Balance

3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users