667 replies to this topic

[PHE0NIX RIS1NG]

When can we expect the next update focused on balancing? 

 

Unfortunately many tanks are being left behind.  

[SPCCN]

choppermeir, on 09 January 2019 - 06:34 PM, said:

 

Try playing 15 or so games straight then accidentally hit the ops tab when you're trying to do something lol it is a nightmare when streaming, it's a small issue yes but isn't that the point of this Q+A? To see what the players want?. 

100% agree with this. It's too much and very little payoff for the player.

[Mashed]

If the Tier8 premium Iron Rain can have an autoloading 128mm gun, making it better than the tech tree Borsig.

Can you please give the Tier8 premium Vindicator the 105mm gun from the Charioteer, making it a fully upgraded premium Charioteer.  Its currently inferior to the tech tree tank, for no good reason.

 

You might even sell some more of them, as the Charioteer with the 105mm is a great TD.

[donny007-THX]

When will the review of the changes made in 4.6 balance to the AMX 30B be completed.

[Teffisk]

Will you ever consider changing all matchmaking to +1/-1? If not, why?

[Teffisk]

Phantomcloud618, on 11 January 2019 - 03:27 AM, said:

Is it possible to increase the ammo capacity of Fv215b(183) & 4005 stage II as much as PC？ 12 in WOTC BUT 20 in WOT. 

Only if you nerf the pen to 235

[Cpl Derren]

Shortly after update 4.7 it was asked if there were more nation camouflage options coming and it was said that there were and that they would be arriving in the next update (4.8) they did not however. Could we get an update as to when these new camouflage options will arrive?

[xxBattleroyAL]

greyweasel UK, on 23 January 2019 - 07:35 PM, said:

Do you at least have a rough time frame when we can expect the FV4202 (X) to make its comeback? 

Would end my break from the game with no doubt for this!

 

And make sure that it is developed with your sketches!  

[Keraseses]

Any upcoming arty Rebalances?

[GameWinner_001]

MaxChaos24, on 24 January 2019 - 07:00 PM, said:

 

It only uses data from players who visit the site. Is that enough to answer what you are looking to know?

 

Oops, just saw your answer today.

 

People who only "visit" the site?

How do they get access to my WoT Console stats if I only "visit" the site? Or do they mean by this, that I have to actively look at my player stats on their site and then my data is considered in all their stats up to the point of time when I last updated my profile on their site (very short answer to that question would be cool)?

 

I conclude from your answer the following:

- wotinfo.net's data is flawed because it only considers a rather small portion of players (probably average to better players),

- only data of the last 30 days is halfway accurate as e.g. overall winrate would include a lot of "old" data of people who have not actualized their proile there for years,

- Something else that WG could mention to defend their position: Most importantly, the nerfbarometer on Wotinfo.net does not take into consideration AT ALL whether, e.g., a certain tier 10 TD is mainly used by players with a very good win rate or whether it is preferred by players with a rather bad win rate. The WG Console team, on the other hand, does take this into consieration as far as I can see it.

--> The nerfbarometer on wotinfo.net does not reflect the situation on certain tanks very well, in my opinion. It leads to confusion and misunderstanding. 

 

--------> Is that correct Max? In case it is you or Paingod could develop an answer which is a bit more elaborate than my initial assumptions. Might be good for the forum....

[MaxChaos24]

GameWinner_001, on 30 January 2019 - 05:20 AM, said:

 

Oops, just saw your answer today.

 

People who only "visit" the site?

How do they get access to my WoT Console stats if I only "visit" the site? Or do they mean by this, that I have to actively look at my player stats on their site and then my data is considered in all their stats up to the point of time when I last updated my profile on their site (very short answer to that question would be cool)?

 

I conclude from your answer the following:

- wotinfo.net's data is flawed because it only considers a rather small portion of players (probably average to better players),

- only data of the last 30 days is halfway accurate as e.g. overall winrate would include a lot of "old" data of people who have not actualized their proile there for years,

- Something else that WG could mention to defend their position: Most importantly, the nerfbarometer on Wotinfo.net does not take into consideration AT ALL whether, e.g., a certain tier 10 TD is mainly used by players with a very good win rate or whether it is preferred by players with a rather bad win rate. The WG Console team, on the other hand, does take this into consieration as far as I can see it.

--> The nerfbarometer on wotinfo.net does not reflect the situation on certain tanks very well, in my opinion. It leads to confusion and misunderstanding. 

 

--------> Is that correct Max? In case it is you or Paingod could develop an answer which is a bit more elaborate than my initial assumptions. Might be good for the forum....

 

Hello, I'm not sure that we need to defend our position or degrade a pretty cool player created fan site. The site already has disclaimers on it that says its only using the data from the players who use the sites and are averages. It provides cool info but not any info for making informed balance decisions. Remember, balance is done based on how tanks perform across all skills levels which has been covered previously by Paingod. Averages are skewed data due to being directly tied to what skill level of player plays it the most.

[Will-E-WangStar]

Will we see the battlehero’s medals earners every week this year?

[MissRaySunShine]

Wanted To Say, Love The Game. Hey, Raibot! Anyways, Will WoTC Be Releasing Any New Light Tank Content In 2019 Or Any New Or Recycled Contracts As I Need To Acquire The Tusk. That Would Be Great Thanks From MissRay! 

[greyweasel UK]

xxBattleroyAL, on 28 January 2019 - 05:28 PM, said:

 

And make sure that it is developed with your sketches!  

 

One can only hope...

[Elite Corsair]

I just have a game developer's question- if I come off as game bashing, my apologies.

 

I just wondered what was the reasoning for having 3 tier 10s branch off of 1 tier 9 tank? ( obj 430 II -> obj 430, 430U, and K-91).  Could this have been better solved by making the original 430 a reward vehicle and then making the new lines like how PC has them? If not, how is this way better?

 

If one reason is that the 430 will then become unobtainable, I think I heard that PC plans to reveal ways that people will be able to re-earn those original tanks.

[Zakeos Thunder]

I know I asked this yesterday and I don't mean to sound rude or anything but when will the LT-432 be available here on console?

[MaxChaos24]

Zakeos Thunder, on 30 January 2019 - 11:07 AM, said:

I know I asked this yesterday and I don't mean to sound rude or anything but when will the LT-432 be available here on console?

 

Hello, questions are gathered once a week, submitted to be answered, and then turned into an Article. This process takes a couple weeks. 

[Zakeos Thunder]

MaxChaos24, on 30 January 2019 - 11:33 AM, said:

 

Hello, questions are gathered once a week, submitted to be answered, and then turned into an Article. This process takes a couple weeks. 

 

i meant I started a general discussion topic yesterday asking about it, but i figured it would a be a good idea ask here because I figured i might get an answer here

[xxBattleroyAL]

Any plans to bring in the Obj279, Obj777 v2, or Obj260?

[IBROX 04]

I've asked before & don't remember getting an answer, any chance you could release the cromwell with the Royal Standard of Scotland, also known as the Banner of the King of Scots or commonly the Lion Rampant as a flag tank or skin type thing ? Please WG please...