Jump to content


Bad matchmaking.

Mm

  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

NyTrO1245 #1 Posted 13 November 2018 - 07:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

Guys it’s to much , when wargaming will fix mm.

its impossible to play , people are spending money in your game but you simply can’t fix mm.

i wrote down on a paper my wins and loses from 67 games I won 26 games. That’s is really bad.

Attached Thumbnails



Tempest fox3 #2 Posted 13 November 2018 - 08:12 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18566 battles
  • 14,388
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013
Your win rate has nothing to do with matchmaking.

War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32 - In order obtained


dave mg 04 #3 Posted 13 November 2018 - 08:31 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 23793 battles
  • 163
  • Member since:
    01-17-2017

View PostTempest fox3, on 13 November 2018 - 08:12 PM, said:

Your win rate has nothing to do with matchmaking.

 

it kind of does when you keep getting put in teams that just disintigrate within the first 3 mins and your left facing at least 8 tanks which surround you.

i just want to be in the other team over half the time .....:trollface:



kromhout55 #4 Posted 13 November 2018 - 08:47 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 28423 battles
  • 585
  • Member since:
    01-26-2017

Well I notice another update has come and gone yet we still await the promised "improvements" to the MM.

As for it having nothing to do with one's/the team's chances of a victory, when you are the team's one and only Tier VIII heavy on the team facing nine Tier X heavies you might start the match feeling a bit overwhelmed.

Or another quite frequent example is where there are four SPGs in the pool of available tanks. Yet the MM'er decides that "balance" is achieved by putting three on the opposition team and one for us poor friendlies.

Great for when you are the attacking team on an Assault game.

I could go on but no doubt I will be told it's all my fault and I should "Git Gudd".



John Arrowsmith #5 Posted 13 November 2018 - 09:35 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 67683 battles
  • 12,569
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Mm I can handle,  but top tier heavies sitting at spawn are a joke.

This forum needs the Fake Marine

Snore,   the only person I know of that likes mushy peas in a taco with cinnamon sprinkles. 

 

 

 


pingwrx #6 Posted 13 November 2018 - 10:21 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20551 battles
  • 1,900
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostNyTrO1245, on 13 November 2018 - 11:52 AM, said:

Guys it’s to much , when wargaming will fix mm.

its impossible to play , people are spending money in your game but you simply can’t fix mm.

i wrote down on a paper my wins and loses from 67 games I won 26 games. That’s is really bad.

 

We all get the same mm it's our own ability to either have a positive influence or not in the game that really is the bottom line in wins and losses.

 

 

 

 

 

 



 


RELIC x #7 Posted 13 November 2018 - 10:42 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 23591 battles
  • 1,109
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View PostNyTrO1245, on 13 November 2018 - 12:52 PM, said:

Guys it’s to much , when wargaming will fix mm.

its impossible to play , people are spending money in your game but you simply can’t fix mm.

i wrote down on a paper my wins and loses from 67 games I won 26 games. That’s is really bad.

 

 As others have said, we all get the same matchmaking.  Over the long term YOUR PLAY is the sole factor in determining your win rate. 

 

I think writing notes is a great first step.  My friendly advice on what else to do, and I know you won't take it, is to play tiers 5-7 for the next 12 months.  There is nothing magical about high tier play.



Tempest fox3 #8 Posted 13 November 2018 - 11:16 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18566 battles
  • 14,388
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View Postdave mg 04, on 13 November 2018 - 08:31 PM, said:

 

it kind of does when you keep getting put in teams that just disintigrate within the first 3 mins and your left facing at least 8 tanks which surround you.

i just want to be in the other team over half the time .....:trollface:

 

Over the course of 10 games maybe, 10 games can be good/bad luck. But 50, 100, 1000...the larger the sample size the more apparent it becomes that match making doesn't determine your win rate. Your personal performance does.


War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32 - In order obtained


genroul RAAM #9 Posted 14 November 2018 - 12:08 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10659 battles
  • 41
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013
If you're on a merc contract, thats likely why. I noticed my RNG take a nose dive on them. 

NyTrO1245 #10 Posted 14 November 2018 - 02:24 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

View Postdave mg 04, on 13 November 2018 - 08:31 PM, said:

 

it kind of does when you keep getting put in teams that just disintigrate within the first 3 mins and your left facing at least 8 tanks which surround you.

i just want to be in the other team over half the time .....:trollface:

 

exactly man totally agree.

NyTrO1245 #11 Posted 14 November 2018 - 02:28 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018
Win rate shouldn’t affect the match making , I am not a bad player , so almost always I staying one vs 5 or more.

pingwrx #12 Posted 14 November 2018 - 03:14 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20551 battles
  • 1,900
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostNyTrO1245, on 14 November 2018 - 06:28 AM, said:

Win rate shouldn’t affect the match making , I am not a bad player , so almost always I staying one vs 5 or more.

 

If you don't think your a bad player then what is a bad player in your opinion?


 


Tempest fox3 #13 Posted 14 November 2018 - 04:10 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 18566 battles
  • 14,388
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View PostNyTrO1245, on 14 November 2018 - 02:28 PM, said:

Win rate shouldn’t affect the match making , I am not a bad player , so almost always I staying one vs 5 or more.

 

Well, you're not really a good player either.


War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32 - In order obtained


NyTrO1245 #14 Posted 14 November 2018 - 05:55 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

View PostTempest fox3, on 14 November 2018 - 04:10 PM, said:

 

Well, you're not really a good player either.

 

the And you are a pro

NyTrO1245 #15 Posted 14 November 2018 - 05:57 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

View PostTempest fox3, on 14 November 2018 - 04:10 PM, said:

 

Well, you're not really a good player either.

 

the bad players are those who don’t have a sense at all. 

And when they are going where they shouldn’t do specially those new plates who buy a premium tank but they newer played this game before , and the game is full of them.



NyTrO1245 #16 Posted 14 November 2018 - 05:59 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

View PostJohn Arrowsmith, on 13 November 2018 - 09:35 PM, said:

Mm I can handle,  but top tier heavies sitting at spawn are a joke.

 

man that’s what happens in my games , this is ridiculous.

I added a photo , and those who is saying that match making is good, check a photo



FuRiOuSMoMo #17 Posted 14 November 2018 - 06:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 8967 battles
  • 135
  • [LPCG]
  • Member since:
    01-05-2014
Curious, since stats are somewhat tracked, can WG take a players skill base, using their tracked stats, and incorporate that into their algorithm when match making? This may be a thing already, I have no idea but on the surface, it has the potential to even the teams a little and make it better for every player, it wont fix everything for sure and people would still find reasons to be pissed, but it cant hurt I dont think.

 

 

 


pingwrx #18 Posted 14 November 2018 - 06:48 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 20551 battles
  • 1,900
  • Member since:
    01-31-2016

View PostNyTrO1245, on 14 November 2018 - 09:55 AM, said:

 

the And you are a pro

 

He may not be a pro but he knows how to play and most importantly how to consistently win.


 


Lysith3a #19 Posted 14 November 2018 - 10:37 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 13014 battles
  • 379
  • Member since:
    07-28-2014

Just finished one game, Tier VII in a IX game - reds had 3 top tier heavies, we had none. The heavies that we did have stuck together and went through the village on Fisherman’s Bay - thought their luck was in as they made it through unopposed. When they got to the other side they were intercepted by a Lycan and Hollenhund which annihilated all three green heavies. Meanwhile, their top tier heavies made mincemeat of the rest of us on the other side. 

 

Only played two games tonight and think I’ve had enough already - the first game was a defeat after getting capped out while leading 10-5..


I aim to misbehave


NyTrO1245 #20 Posted 15 November 2018 - 10:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 4005 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    08-31-2018

View PostFuRiOuSMoMo, on 14 November 2018 - 06:22 PM, said:

Curious, since stats are somewhat tracked, can WG take a players skill base, using their tracked stats, and incorporate that into their algorithm when match making? This may be a thing already, I have no idea but on the surface, it has the potential to even the teams a little and make it better for every player, it wont fix everything for sure and people would still find reasons to be pissed, but it cant hurt I dont think.

 

Alright let’s say if I am a bad player. But the thing is that I always have in a team bad players but opponents have good players and they destroy over team in 4 minutes. It’s should be like on a pc version everyone is playing together players with bad statistics and Good statistics.





Also tagged with Mm

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users