Jump to content


T95E2, will this get a pen buff aswell?

T95E2 KV-5 T-34-3 112 WZ-111 T26E4 Super Pershing Buff PMM

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

Poll: how is the T95E2 compared to other PMM Vehicles? (23 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll.

T95E2 Rating.

  1. 1 (3 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  2. 2 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 3 (3 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  4. 4 (5 votes [21.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.74%

  5. 5 (6 votes [26.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.09%

  6. 6 (1 vote [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  7. 7 (3 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  8. 8 (1 vote [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  9. 9 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. 10 (1 vote [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

Do you think the T95E2 needs a buff?

  1. Yes (21 votes [91.30%])

    Percentage of vote: 91.30%

  2. No (please comment why you think it does not need a buff) (2 votes [8.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.70%

Vote Hide poll

Vampire_Izumi #1 Posted 19 January 2019 - 07:02 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 25706 battles
  • 2,971
  • [LEONI]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

i am just curious if this tank will get a pen buff like the T26E4 Super Pershing did.

compared to most other tier 8 PMM premium tanks, it is bad in pretty much every area.

here are my current thoughts of the T95E2's current everything:

pen is poor, not as bad as the KV-5 but is still only 173/250/45. wile the Super Pershing has 192/258/45.

the armor is also pretty bad, the  turret face can bounce shells but is usely easily penned since it is not that thick and the face of the turret where the gun mantlet is, is only 114.3mm thick.(next to the gun on either side)

infact the Hull armor is easily penned almost everywhere by this tank's own gun. even the turret in most areas can be penned by this tanks 173mms of pen.

 

so can this tank get the Super Pershing's Pen buff? because atleast tanks with the same amount of Pen like the T-34-3, 112, KV-5, WZ-111, do 300-390 average damage a shot AND have good armor.

  (kv-5 even has almost the same RoF KV-5= 7 rounds a minute T95E2= 8 rounds a minute)

 

thank you!


Edited by greenteam117, 19 January 2019 - 07:04 AM.

     A lie about a lie turns inside out upon itself. - Magane chikujoin   

Marks of Excellence:


BoereJack #2 Posted 19 January 2019 - 09:52 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 35480 battles
  • 3,386
  • [XRM]
  • Member since:
    01-20-2016
Nope, not needed with 250heat pen and pref matchmaking

 My Youtube Channel Filled With WOT PS4 Gameplay: https://www.youtube....FnoS605ne-GYwiA

3 MARKED TANKS:

SNAKEBITE, T21, SP1C, LYCAN, T-54 LWT


MASHMAN 90 #3 Posted 19 January 2019 - 11:28 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 36003 battles
  • 12,111
  • Member since:
    02-21-2014

I'd say Yes, The less tanks we have in the T-54/Object 430 II situation the better. By that i mean they have 201 Pen but 330 HEAT, i mean why? doesn't that just promote Premium Spam? One of the things people complain about? More people firing Standard Ammo the better and save the Premium for things like Maus, E-100 and Type 5 Heavies. I'd also recommend buffing the pen on the KV-5 if you buff the T95E2 as i think the KV-5 has the lowest pen of any of the Tier 8 PMM Vehicles with 167.

 

On PC the Object 430 II gun was buffed to have 246 mm of pen, that's more like it as less Premium Spam needed compared to the 201 we have now. T69 and T54E1 promote the same problem. On PC the T95E2 was only buffed by 8 mm to be the same as the T69 which is alright as it has PMM. KV-5 got buffed by 19 mm at 186 which is a big buff to the tank (181 would have been fine).

 

What i would like to see more than the pen buff on the T95E2 which never bothered me but it was always the cupola so what i would like is for the T95E2, Legion and similar vehicles to get the M48 Patton treatment to the cupola, Shrink it a little bit.



markyjmeech #4 Posted 19 January 2019 - 11:52 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 32364 battles
  • 3,869
  • [B-W-P]
  • Member since:
    02-20-2014

This tank IMO is one of the worst tier 8 PMM tanks, it is sorely over due a Pen buff to bring into line with the other tanks in its class and PMM ! the only reason i believe that it hasn't not received a pen buff is that most players that play it load almost full HEAT in battle (Me included :() as always tanks are always been evaluated and who knows what if going top happen over the next few updates this year.

 

 

 


 

 

A prestigious member of the Senior Technical Engineer Club 

Twitch channel if anyone is interested  https://www.twitch.tv/markyjmeech Twitter @Markyjmeech Discord Markyjmeech SZQWCz9.jpg

 


Speedster202 #5 Posted 19 January 2019 - 07:27 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 15757 battles
  • 88
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014
It doesn't need a buff imo. Preferential mm and 250mm of heat pen is enough.

I make YouTube videos on WoT Console

Link: https://www.youtube....w_as=subscriber 

 


MASHMAN 90 #6 Posted 19 January 2019 - 08:29 PM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 36003 battles
  • 12,111
  • Member since:
    02-21-2014

View PostSpeedster202, on 19 January 2019 - 07:27 PM, said:

It doesn't need a buff imo. Preferential mm and 250mm of heat pen is enough.

 

I think he means Standard Ammo only.

bucket 911 #7 Posted 23 January 2019 - 11:47 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 14137 battles
  • 497
  • Member since:
    07-12-2013
Honestly... Just removing its tumor would be the best buff it could get. 

KilledByPing #8 Posted 25 February 2019 - 09:02 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14673 battles
  • 2,143
  • [ENVY]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2017

I would suggest just a slight buff of 10-20 mm penetration.

 

But this tank have other problems then pen. Seems like it's aim time and accuracy numbers in tankopedia and garage doesnt have anything to do with actual accuracy and gun handling stats.

It aim like Soviet heavy and shoot the same like it have 0,46 accuracy when fully aimed.

Also shell speed is terrible.

Hull have been ninja nerfed without notice in patch notes when Sharpshooter were implemented reducing it's top speed and turn rate. T92e2 had 55 km/h max speed before and pretty decent turn rate. Now it's barely get 48 top speed and turn like a turd in the swamp.

Speaking of actual stats have nothing to do with numbers shown on tankopedia and garage - it still show T95e2 have 56 km\h top speed but you never reach that unless you drive down the hill.


Edited by KilledByPing, 25 February 2019 - 09:12 AM.


Gmorck #9 Posted 03 March 2019 - 07:18 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 18997 battles
  • 388
  • Member since:
    12-13-2015
 Agrree with the tumor.. 

Vampire_Izumi #10 Posted 03 March 2019 - 07:21 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 25706 battles
  • 2,971
  • [LEONI]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

View PostGmorck, on 04 March 2019 - 04:18 AM, said:

 Agrree with the tumor.. 

 


     A lie about a lie turns inside out upon itself. - Magane chikujoin   

Marks of Excellence:





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users