Jump to content


T-VI-100 looks like a great concept but...


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

greenteam117 #1 Posted 12 February 2019 - 11:24 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22219 battles
  • 2,398
  • [LEONI]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

in most areas it is inferior to all other Tiger I Variants at tier 7:

View Postgreenteam117, on 12 February 2019 - 08:08 PM, said:

looking at the gun it is basically a normal tiger that gives up 10 pen for 10 damage, so regular tiger that is russian. but loses a lot of it's DPM potential.

Tiger I: Pen 203/237/44 Damage 240/240/295

Russian Tiger: Pen 190/247/50 Damage 250/250/330

 

Edit: it's reload is also longer than a normal tiger. 8.96=tiger I, 7.23=Russian Tiger

Edit: accuracy is also worse at 0.36 VS Tiger I 0.34/0.33 (Hammer). Aimtime is better though at 2.40s VS 2.70s

                                                                                                                                                          ^                ^

                                                                                                                                            Russian Tiger      German Tiger

 

​and it is expensive!!! at 7,400 gold base price!!!

the FV201 (A45) Black Edition is cheaper.... by almost 1,500 gold... (5,940)


Edited by greenteam117, 12 February 2019 - 11:26 AM.

 

Marks of Excellence:


Haukkis #2 Posted 12 February 2019 - 11:27 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 30616 battles
  • 1,916
  • Member since:
    08-05-2015
Too expensive... if it were cheaper I might buy it...

MaxChaos24 #3 Posted 12 February 2019 - 11:29 AM

    Gameplay Expert

  • Administrator
  • 12269 battles
  • 18,945
  • [WGW]
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013
RoF is actually 8.72 rounds per minute. Having the article corrected.

greenteam117 #4 Posted 12 February 2019 - 11:30 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22219 battles
  • 2,398
  • [LEONI]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 February 2019 - 08:29 PM, said:

RoF is actually 8.72 rounds per minute. Having the article corrected.

 

oh okay! that makes the tank look a lot better than before in terms of being useful in the battlefield.

 

Marks of Excellence:


Coupdeteat #5 Posted 12 February 2019 - 12:15 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 27245 battles
  • 966
  • [HIRAM]
  • Member since:
    03-19-2014
It looks like a very nice tank, when it drops into the personal offer arena I may just pick one up. Any way to tell if it has camo, or will need that equipped?

JuniorDelGebi17 #6 Posted 12 February 2019 - 01:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25201 battles
  • 194
  • [CJM]
  • Member since:
    08-17-2016

View PostCoupdeteat, on 12 February 2019 - 09:15 AM, said:

It looks like a very nice tank, when it drops into the personal offer arena I may just pick one up. Any way to tell if it has camo, or will need that equipped?

 

already have

leedozer #7 Posted 12 February 2019 - 01:10 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 34950 battles
  • 1,493
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    09-05-2014

View PostCoupdeteat, on 12 February 2019 - 12:15 PM, said:

It looks like a very nice tank, when it drops into the personal offer arena I may just pick one up. Any way to tell if it has camo, or will need that equipped?

if you believe there news page,it will only be sold once this year,but take that with a pinch of salt,wg are not known for there promises lol.



DoomPanzer #8 Posted 12 February 2019 - 01:15 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 29386 battles
  • 347
  • [-USA-]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View Postleedozer, on 12 February 2019 - 07:10 AM, said:

if you believe there news page,it will only be sold once this year,but take that with a pinch of salt,wg are not known for there promises lol.

Oh they will sell it again it’s WG, cmon man! This tank does look sweet but the base price is to high no doubt.


*3 Marks of Excellence*

Centurion AX, Chieftain, FV215b, T110E4, IS-7, T110E5, Conquerer, E-75, M103, T-34B, 112, Type 59, Motherland, Fatherland, Obj 252u, IS-M, Fcm 50t, T26E4, KV-5, HMH Amx M4 Mle. 49, T95e2, Legion, STA-1, Emil 1, ChieftainT95, IS-2, T29, Tiger 1, Tiger 131, 45TP, The Warlord, T-34-88


KilroyWasHere17 #9 Posted 12 February 2019 - 02:40 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13881 battles
  • 953
  • Member since:
    07-11-2015

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 February 2019 - 06:29 AM, said:

RoF is actually 8.72 rounds per minute. Having the article corrected.

Well that's good I saw that on there and that was about to be a deal breaker.



Pontiac Pat #10 Posted 12 February 2019 - 03:34 PM

    Major

  • WoTC Tournaments Contributor
  • 22528 battles
  • 6,301
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014
It's very similar to the Hammer.  Slightly better mobility/alpha/dpm/aim time and worse accuracy, standard pen and health.

If you want to be one of the 47 Ronin check out our recruitment post and then send a message to Prof935 (xbox) or dimka935 (ps4).

Estimated Marks of Excellence thresholds - https://wotclans.com.br/tanks/moe


Aelgyn #11 Posted 12 February 2019 - 11:54 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14399 battles
  • 1,426
  • Member since:
    11-26-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 12 February 2019 - 03:29 AM, said:

RoF is actually 8.72 rounds per minute. Having the article corrected.

 

How hard is it to get this info right the first time? Year after year after year and the same lame issues still happen. Yesterday I had lost the ability to spectate after getting killed in a battle - the triggers would no longer work to switch me to other friendly tanks. Fortunately, the capability seems to have been restored today. But now I get the store being flagged as having new items, even though I've seen them all (another years' long issue).

xXz ELIJAH zXx #12 Posted 13 February 2019 - 01:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18954 battles
  • 74
  • [3ARAD]
  • Member since:
    06-08-2015

First impressions not so good but I think it is me. I do very well with my 131 and Hammer....this one does not seem to have the pen those do. Yes accuracy is not as good but the pen seems less. Still I like it and will learn it, only 3 battles so far so I will update later but 0-3 is not a good start. I have been in Tier 8 matches (2) though so that has something to do with it I am sure.

 

Edit:

 

 

 

 

I am getting better but have to be less aggressive. Once I understand that I was doing better, win % is team driven as I was in the top 5 for most of them. Here is the 131 for comparison:

 

 

 

 

 

 

And the Hammer:

 

 


Edited by xXz ELIJAH zXx, 13 February 2019 - 04:03 AM.

 


LignoTestudon #13 Posted 13 February 2019 - 02:14 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5653 battles
  • 101
  • [CNUT]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014
You're sure that T-VI-100 has the option to select camo skins? Yeah. I've never had that Tiger tank before, in my gamer life. Would be more than good to afford it, but I can't.

LignoTestudon #14 Posted 13 February 2019 - 02:19 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5653 battles
  • 101
  • [CNUT]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014
Believe it or not, that gun happens to be the same one both the T-54 First Prototype and its Motherland counterpart are armed with, compared to the T-VI-100.

xXz ELIJAH zXx #15 Posted 13 February 2019 - 03:57 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18954 battles
  • 74
  • [3ARAD]
  • Member since:
    06-08-2015

View PostLignoTestudon, on 12 February 2019 - 09:19 PM, said:

Believe it or not, that gun happens to be the same one both the T-54 First Prototype and its Motherland counterpart are armed with, compared to the T-VI-100.

 

What? I am not a fan of it so far....but that is me. I will take the 131 gun hands down.

 


RedFire7722 #16 Posted 13 February 2019 - 04:50 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 8805 battles
  • 2,417
  • Member since:
    06-21-2014

View PostxXz ELIJAH zXx, on 12 February 2019 - 09:57 PM, said:

 

 

What site are using for those stats. Thx.



player524 #17 Posted 13 February 2019 - 06:19 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 35033 battles
  • 46
  • [TVTC]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
No camo on the tank.. Had to be bought.
It's not bad or good. Typical Tiger1 with the same armor.
It's definitely not a brawler. Guns a little Trollish. But can do some decent damage.
Like I said.. Not bad, not good. About the same as the British Huntsman.
But without the accuracy

Coupdeteat #18 Posted 13 February 2019 - 06:34 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 27245 battles
  • 966
  • [HIRAM]
  • Member since:
    03-19-2014
Without camo kinda kills it for me. I really wish most premium tanks came with camouflage. It gets annoying having to equip everything else then that as well. I’d rather just have a little more in the purchase price and not have the same old camouflage on each tank. 

xXz ELIJAH zXx #19 Posted 13 February 2019 - 12:26 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18954 battles
  • 74
  • [3ARAD]
  • Member since:
    06-08-2015

View PostRedFire7722, on 12 February 2019 - 11:50 PM, said:

 

What site are using for those stats. Thx.

 

 

 

https://wotstatsconsole.de/login

I love it and it keeps getting better

 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by xXz ELIJAH zXx, 13 February 2019 - 10:23 PM.


Aelgyn #20 Posted 14 February 2019 - 12:54 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 14399 battles
  • 1,426
  • Member since:
    11-26-2014

View PostCoupdeteat, on 12 February 2019 - 10:34 PM, said:

Without camo kinda kills it for me. I really wish most premium tanks came with camouflage. It gets annoying having to equip everything else then that as well. I’d rather just have a little more in the purchase price and not have the same old camouflage on each tank. 

 

Yes, but then when they allow you to trade the tank, they'd have to refund you that cost as well. As it goes right now, you're taking that loss. Another small win for WG.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users