Jump to content


Bobject 268 V4 Mobility trade for Historical Armor?

Object 268 V4 Trade Armor Mobility

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Poll: Bobject 268 V4 Mobility trade for Historical Armor? (4 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 50 battles in order to participate this poll.

Trade 268 V4's Armor for Historical Armor for better Mobility?

  1. Yes (2 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. No (2 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Hide poll

USSWISCONSIN94 #1 Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:19 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12185 battles
  • 27,951
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

OK. Let's see how this'll end. but got a little poll for you. Would you be willing to trade the armor of the Object 268 V4 in exchange for better mobility?

 

Found a pic showing the historical armor values of the Bobject and curious to see what people here think

 

 

https://i.imgur.com/YGqbFAz.png


http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Tempest fox3 #2 Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:39 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 21057 battles
  • 18,467
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013
So you propose turning a bad E3 into a bad Obj 268? (the other 268)

War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32, Tiger 131, Skoda T25 - In order obtained

 

Spoiler

USSWISCONSIN94 #3 Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:52 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12185 battles
  • 27,951
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostTempest fox3, on 29 March 2019 - 01:39 PM, said:

So you propose turning a bad E3 into a bad Obj 268? (the other 268)

 

Saying turn it into a mobile Decent armor TD and not the idiot proof tank it is with the armor is has now. Its better then it is now.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Very Classy #4 Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:52 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33116 battles
  • 3,708
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    04-24-2014

View PostTempest fox3, on 29 March 2019 - 01:39 PM, said:

So you propose turning a bad E3 into a bad Obj 268? (the other 268)

 

Meh... give it auto-loader and spaced armor. Then, Stronk tenk.


There is literally an Xbox 360 in a museum, and this is the best joke you can come up with?
                                                                                         -- allhavoc


Tempest fox3 #5 Posted 29 March 2019 - 06:55 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 21057 battles
  • 18,467
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 29 March 2019 - 06:52 PM, said:

 

Saying turn it into a mobile Decent armor TD and not the idiot proof tank it is with the armor is has now. Its better then it is now.

 

It would still be a bad tank, just with a different playstyle. 


War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32, Tiger 131, Skoda T25 - In order obtained

 

Spoiler

USSWISCONSIN94 #6 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:01 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12185 battles
  • 27,951
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostTempest fox3, on 29 March 2019 - 01:55 PM, said:

 

It would still be a bad tank, just with a different playstyle. 

 

Not if you change the stats of the tank. Be better than the way it is now. Be able to pen it for once from the front.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


ArKenemyxX #7 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:09 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22630 battles
  • 2,011
  • [PRIME]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2017
We wouldn't need to trade armor if WG kept the engine horsepower. Just nerf the top speed to 32 and I'd be happy. It's a turd as is.


USSWISCONSIN94 #8 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:14 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12185 battles
  • 27,951
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostArKenemyxX, on 29 March 2019 - 02:09 PM, said:

We wouldn't need to trade armor if WG kept the engine horsepower. Just nerf the top speed to 32 and I'd be happy. It's a turd as is.

 

Would have been better if they never brought it in. But that sucks. It doesn't need more mobility with the armor it has.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


ArKenemyxX #9 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:16 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22630 battles
  • 2,011
  • [PRIME]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2017

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 29 March 2019 - 12:14 PM, said:

 

Would have been better if they never brought it in. But that sucks. It doesn't need more mobility with the armor it has.

 

Nerf lower plate, problem solved


SaltyMcD #10 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:17 PM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 21751 battles
  • 2,815
  • Member since:
    12-21-2016
 It needs both .  Mine will remain off the roster until it gets a serious buff. 

“ Never trust a forum member that uses an Anime profile pic .”      - SaltyMcD 


Haukkis #11 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:22 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 34544 battles
  • 3,089
  • Member since:
    08-05-2015

View PostSaltyMcD, on 29 March 2019 - 08:17 PM, said:

 It needs both .  Mine will remain off the roster until it gets a serious buff. 

 

This.

USSWISCONSIN94 #12 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:25 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12185 battles
  • 27,951
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostArKenemyxX, on 29 March 2019 - 02:16 PM, said:

 

Nerf lower plate, problem solved

 

Fine by that. But by how much though? Should be brought down to 150-200.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


ArKenemyxX #13 Posted 29 March 2019 - 07:34 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 22630 battles
  • 2,011
  • [PRIME]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2017

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 29 March 2019 - 12:25 PM, said:

 

Fine by that. But by how much though? Should be brought down to 150-200.

 

IDK, if it could get buffed to have mobility and be a mobile td like the 263 or 268 then lower plate should be nerfed a lot. no reason fo yolowagon





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users