Jump to content


Tank rebalancing


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

IIIKenpachiIII #1 Posted 14 April 2019 - 10:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12490 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    02-18-2014

Is the console version also rebalancing as the PC version because the console version is even worse balanced than the pc version and that should mean something? Some tanks are less accurate and even have up to 500 dpm less than the pc version of course not the Russians that would be bad



x rocketfish x #2 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:01 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15367 battles
  • 781
  • Member since:
    05-27-2015
Actually lots of the new Russian tanks have much worse stats on console than on PC. Have you been living in a cave and not seen all the complaint threads about the Defender,Object 268v4, Object 430U,K91,Object 277,LT432,etc. all having considerably worse stats than PC?

Very Classy #3 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:11 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 27398 battles
  • 2,787
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    04-24-2014
But all my favorite tanks are the unbalanced ones. I've been assured they aren't removing players' favorite tanks. 

PumpkinEcobar #4 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:19 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 13912 battles
  • 3,348
  • Member since:
    04-21-2016
Well, that's like, your opinion...man.

Very Classy #5 Posted 14 April 2019 - 11:45 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 27398 battles
  • 2,787
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    04-24-2014

View PostP*umpkinEcobar, on 14 April 2019 - 06:19 PM, said:

Well, that's like, your opinion...man.

 

*goes to make White Russian*

 



IIIKenpachiIII #6 Posted 15 April 2019 - 12:39 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12490 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    02-18-2014

View Postx rocketfish x, on 14 April 2019 - 11:01 PM, said:

Actually lots of the new Russian tanks have much worse stats on console than on PC. Have you been living in a cave and not seen all the complaint threads about the Defender,Object 268v4, Object 430U,K91,Object 277,LT432,etc. all having considerably worse stats than PC?

 

yes russians also have worse stats but other countries have a harder nerves, for example the new t6 italian has 240 dpm less russians mediums 100, the maus has 400, the 113 350dpm less russ heavies 100,  the caernarvon 560 the is3 the same as pc not one russ come even close to the dpm nerves from other countries.



KNALLLER #7 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:13 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 13211 battles
  • 488
  • Member since:
    08-06-2016
alone the monster nerf for the e50 is the joke of the century. the German tanks would rather need a buff ... such as the Tiger 2, e100 etc. On the PC, the German are adapted to the next patch. But before something happens on the console, several years pass, if at all.

Thanks to WarGaming anti-EU attitude and disgusting deleting of non-English speaking communities ,,I,,

 

 

 


FRlGHTKNIGHT #8 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:14 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 6399 battles
  • 737
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2018
I assure you, PC has way more balancing problems than console. Just because some tanks are not as OP on console, doesn't mean they are less balanced. I would suggest that the inverse is actually true.

KNALLLER #9 Posted 15 April 2019 - 07:50 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 13211 battles
  • 488
  • Member since:
    08-06-2016
PC has way more balancing problems? if you put such a thing into the world, then please with examples.

Thanks to WarGaming anti-EU attitude and disgusting deleting of non-English speaking communities ,,I,,

 

 

 


Nuke2099 #10 Posted 15 April 2019 - 10:57 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21767 battles
  • 13,699
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-11-2014

View Postx rocketfish x, on 14 April 2019 - 11:01 PM, said:

Actually lots of the new Russian tanks have much worse stats on console than on PC. Have you been living in a cave and not seen all the complaint threads about the Defender,Object 268v4, Object 430U,K91,Object 277,LT432,etc. all having considerably worse stats than PC?

 

These ones aren't that much worse. So really you only named two that were butchered.


lQqtvt1.gif

Nuke2099 #11 Posted 15 April 2019 - 10:58 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21767 battles
  • 13,699
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-11-2014

View PostFRlGHTKNIGHT, on 15 April 2019 - 06:14 AM, said:

I assure you, PC has way more balancing problems than console. Just because some tanks are not as OP on console, doesn't mean they are less balanced. I would suggest that the inverse is actually true.

 

Actually PC is overall better balanced. They're also fixing and changing the problems they created unlike the console devs.
lQqtvt1.gif

scwirpeo #12 Posted 15 April 2019 - 11:21 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 39455 battles
  • 10,153
  • [CRY]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2014

View PostFRlGHTKNIGHT, on 14 April 2019 - 11:14 PM, said:

I assure you, PC has way more balancing problems than console. Just because some tanks are not as OP on console, doesn't mean they are less balanced. I would suggest that the inverse is actually true.

 

If that's your opinion, then how exactly does CB just copy paste parts of the same PC buffs and nerfs. Without actually understanding why or how they were implemented on PC count as "better". Sounds like a bad way to balance a game, and it turns out it often is.

MOEs so I can pretend like they matter

Spoiler

 


IIIKenpachiIII #13 Posted 15 April 2019 - 11:21 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12490 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:
    02-18-2014

View PostKNALLLER, on 15 April 2019 - 07:50 AM, said:

PC has way more balancing problems? if you put such a thing into the world, then please with examples.


oh you want an example of bad balancing not easier than that. Stock P43 BIS dpm -300, aim time +0.19 and since that's not nerf enough the accuracy is still around 0.04 lower with a dmg of 110 and 118 pen you can see tanks up to t8. We all know that the tanks that are stock are the most dangerous, that's why they also need a tough nerve






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users