Jump to content

RNG sugestion

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Fulberti #1 Posted 18 April 2019 - 06:12 AM


  • Players
  • 4255 battles
  • 3
  • [WOTIT]
  • Member since:

Hi all,


I get the mechanics involved in RNG but I think there is a big flaw in all that and I will explain why I think so....

-first of all RNG SHOULD take in consideration the CREW LEVEL ... why ??? a lvl 1 CREW has now exactly the same changes of getting a hit as an lvl 10 CREW ....not even close if you consider how many battles an lvl 10 CREW has vs an lvl 1 and they know (according to experience) where their projectile will land exactly

-a damaged part (turret let's say) doesn't have the same quality as an brand new one

-a tank where crew members are dead (not all but some....) doesn't have the same ability as an full crew to shoot ....


those are e few of the things I consider RNG should also take in consideration...simple...low lvl crew...low RNG.....missing crew member ....low RNG....damaged gun, turret...visor...low RNG.... and by low RNG I mean more chance to get off center shots....

Jodmeister #2 Posted 18 April 2019 - 07:34 AM


  • Supertest - Xbox One
  • 18324 battles
  • 1,234
  • [BDGR]
  • Member since:
A damaged module or crew already give a penalty. A low level crew is already disadvantaged versus one with multiple perks. Adding more penalties is not a good idea. And you do realise RNG not only gives low rolls it also gives high rolls?

3 MOEs - Nashorn, M36 Jackson, SU-100, S35CA, Matilda IV, Jagdpanzer IV, Archer, Wolverine, Achilles

2 MOEs - Type 58, Pzkpfw T25, WT Pz IV, JagdPanther, SU-100Y, Boilermaker, T20, IS-2, T-34-88, T25/2, Borsig, AMX AC 48, Charioteer, Plaguebringer, PzSflIVC, T67, SU-85

SlagInGristle #3 Posted 18 April 2019 - 12:10 PM


  • Players
  • 33929 battles
  • 3,021
  • [6SIC6]
  • Member since:
Good luck. 

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users