Jump to content


What Premium Tanks are superior to their TT counterpart


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

mi amigo 9 #1 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:16 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16769 battles
  • 244
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

The Cromwell B is so I sold my Cromwell.  Can't see any point in playing the inferior version of the tank when the premium plays better and makes more money.

 

Any others?



FusionStar287 #2 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:20 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 19500 battles
  • 15,442
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013
Just sticking with the British mediums the Banshee is a slightly better Comet and the Atomic is basically just a Centurion I with a much better ROF.

"My dear brothers, take note of this: Men should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, for man's anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires." ~ James 1: 19-20

 

"wefWEGFRF" - RaiBOT01, 2017


CivilWarGoat #3 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:24 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 24263 battles
  • 889
  • [RED1]
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013
Any premium released in the last 2.5 years is better than the TT version. 

mi amigo 9 #4 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16769 battles
  • 244
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostFusionStar287, on 19 May 2019 - 04:20 AM, said:

Just sticking with the British mediums the Banshee is a slightly better Comet and the Atomic is basically just a Centurion I with a much better ROF.

 

Grinding that line right now and I have the atomic also and just unlocked the Centurion.  I noticed the ROF on the final package but strangely enough the TT has better traverse? I think and terrain resistance so it might be a tossup there.  Not out my console right now so don't quote me on the exact specifics but depending on how you play the ROF may not be that big of an advantage. 

FusionStar287 #5 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:37 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 19500 battles
  • 15,442
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View Postmi amigo 9, on 18 May 2019 - 11:24 PM, said:

 

Grinding that line right now and I have the atomic also and just unlocked the Centurion.  I noticed the ROF on the final package but strangely enough the TT has better traverse? I think and terrain resistance so it might be a tossup there.  Not out my console right now so don't quote me on the exact specifics but depending on how you play the ROF may not be that big of an advantage. 

The TT Centurion I does have a 2 degrees per second better turret traverse and .02 better accuracy, but both of those advantages are almost entirely insignificant. The Atomic, on the other hand, has a more than half a round per minute better ROF and substantially better ground resistances (which both makes it faster to accelerate and, if I'm not mistaken, faster to turn as well).


"My dear brothers, take note of this: Men should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, for man's anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires." ~ James 1: 19-20

 

"wefWEGFRF" - RaiBOT01, 2017


deadman1921 #6 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:42 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 25936 battles
  • 1,230
  • [-STO-]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

Does the 85M count?

 

Seems better than the regular 85 to me without looking. 


Soldiers of the One/ #GlenIsOurs

 


JustParky #7 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:47 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25822 battles
  • 241
  • [A14]
  • Member since:
    01-22-2015

Slayer > SU-152

HMH T-34-85M > T-34-85

 


2MOE: Bat Chat 12t - ELC Bis - T29 - Tiger -  T25/2 - Slayer - Borsig - Baby Waffle - ISU152

3MOE: SU-100

Join my clan if you are looking for platoon mates Here


FusionStar287 #8 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:51 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 19500 battles
  • 15,442
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostJustParky, on 18 May 2019 - 11:47 PM, said:

Slayer > SU-152

HMH T-34-85M > T-34-85

 

The Slayer is actually worse than the TT SU-152 in most regards.


"My dear brothers, take note of this: Men should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, for man's anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires." ~ James 1: 19-20

 

"wefWEGFRF" - RaiBOT01, 2017


PumpkinEcobar #9 Posted 19 May 2019 - 04:57 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 14513 battles
  • 3,457
  • Member since:
    04-21-2016
The Lycan is now tremendously better than its TT counter part.

mi amigo 9 #10 Posted 19 May 2019 - 05:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16769 battles
  • 244
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostPumpkinEcobar, on 19 May 2019 - 04:57 AM, said:

The Lycan is now tremendously better than its TT counter part.

 

Oh yeah Lycan was one of the first premiums I ever won.  When I finally got around to grinding through the TT equiv it wasn't even close though I enjoyed that tank it was insta sold after elited.

mi amigo 9 #11 Posted 19 May 2019 - 05:13 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16769 battles
  • 244
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostFusionStar287, on 19 May 2019 - 04:37 AM, said:

The TT Centurion I does have a 2 degrees per second better turret traverse and .02 better accuracy, but both of those advantages are almost entirely insignificant. The Atomic, on the other hand, has a more than half a round per minute better ROF and substantially better ground resistances (which both makes it faster to accelerate and, if I'm not mistaken, faster to turn as well).

 

Ah just about ready to unlock final package on Centurion so hadn't done a perfect comparison yet.  It was the ground resistance on the Cromwell B that almost makes it seem like a completely different tank I finally figured out.  It's huge for someone like me that loves to run full speed and gun in my lights or mediums.  Looks like I will be selling the Centurion also.

Teffisk #12 Posted 19 May 2019 - 05:37 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21241 battles
  • 1,048
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015
The HMH AMX M4 49 seems much more fearsome than the AMX 65t.

In my personal opinion, the Nomad is better than the AMX 50 100.

The Ariete is definitely better than the Pantera.

I think the Scourge is better than the IS-3.

Maybe the Vengeance is better than the Pershing.

The Thunderbolt is better than the Jumbo.

FusionStar287 #13 Posted 19 May 2019 - 05:57 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 19500 battles
  • 15,442
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostTeffisk, on 19 May 2019 - 12:37 AM, said:

The HMH AMX M4 49 seems much more fearsome than the AMX 65t.

In my personal opinion, the Nomad is better than the AMX 50 100.

The Ariete is definitely better than the Pantera.

I think the Scourge is better than the IS-3.

Maybe the Vengeance is better than the Pershing.

The Thunderbolt is better than the Jumbo.

I'd argue that both the Pershing and the Jumbo are easily better than the premiums similar to them.


"My dear brothers, take note of this: Men should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, for man's anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires." ~ James 1: 19-20

 

"wefWEGFRF" - RaiBOT01, 2017


Afro Palestine #14 Posted 19 May 2019 - 06:17 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 54714 battles
  • 4,485
  • [HKC]
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014

View PostCivilWarGoat, on 19 May 2019 - 04:24 AM, said:

Any premium released in the last 2.5 years is better than the TT version. 

 

Not entirely true.  Champion M4 is certainly not better than a TT M4.    Fighting Girlfriend T-34 is not as good as the TT variant.  Pudel is certainly not as good as its TT counterpart.   Many are better, but there are few clunkers.

Sadriel Fett #15 Posted 19 May 2019 - 06:50 AM

    Major

  • Supertest - Xbox One
  • 25710 battles
  • 4,854
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
Surprised no one has said the Tiger 131, yet.  That PMM pretty much guarantees it's always going to be mid or top tier.

 

"There's no such thing as "Arty Safe."  You have to play "Arty Aware."  You have to play "SmArty."


Teffisk #16 Posted 19 May 2019 - 07:43 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 21241 battles
  • 1,048
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015

View PostFusionStar287, on 19 May 2019 - 05:57 AM, said:

I'd argue that both the Pershing and the Jumbo are early better than the premiums similar to them.

Fair because I haven't played the Jumbo or Vengeance. The improved speed of the Vengeance seems like a great advantage and the Thunderbolt is just very very strong, but maybe I can't say. 



MrTrollPacMan #17 Posted 19 May 2019 - 08:00 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 17577 battles
  • 5,265
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013
STA-2 > STA-1

Plum1973 #18 Posted 19 May 2019 - 08:40 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 164 battles
  • 226
  • Member since:
    12-19-2018

Imperial dreadnoughts

Maybe AT15A is a little better then AT7 ? (AT7  received solid nerf)


Rookie again

Dyslexsticks #19 Posted 19 May 2019 - 09:02 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 34007 battles
  • 9,717
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014

 

Why did everything go bold?


Did you manage to stand my post? You might like: My Twitch Channel | My YouTube Channel | My Twitter (fixed!)My Xbox to YouTube Guide


Rommels Cat #20 Posted 19 May 2019 - 09:24 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 1437 battles
  • 326
  • Member since:
    03-28-2019

I'm not bold.

tumblr_mfcgstY8e51s11cz1o1_400.gif

i prefer tt over premiums as they are essentially 'pay 2 win' so it doesnt matter how good I do in one, it's still feels meh. 

Except 2j who i love of course.

Crom b probably the most underated op tanks in the game. 


Edited by Rommels Cat, 19 May 2019 - 09:25 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users