Jump to content


Tvp T50/51 (BUFF NEEDED)


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

jellymonster0 #1 Posted 18 July 2019 - 12:09 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16716 battles
  • 173
  • [M1N9]
  • Member since:
    10-29-2015

This tank has become obsolete after the 2nd nerf to 31 seconds reload, it is embarrassing! 

It was perfectly balanced at 24 seconds but nope gotta add an extra 7 seconds and that's after an already existing nerf of 3 seconds. 

It's gun handling is meh, low pen. 

The tier 9 is better tier for tier... should it really be like that??? No ofc not.

Defo needs a buff too 24/25 seconds.



Haukkis #2 Posted 18 July 2019 - 12:43 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 34205 battles
  • 2,960
  • Member since:
    08-05-2015
Agreed.

Wroclaw #3 Posted 20 July 2019 - 03:13 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 56317 battles
  • 4,649
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
its not a strong armor medium. it didnt need to get the second nerf.

jellymonster0 #4 Posted 06 August 2019 - 12:37 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16716 battles
  • 173
  • [M1N9]
  • Member since:
    10-29-2015

View PostWroclaw, on 20 July 2019 - 03:13 AM, said:

its not a strong armor medium. it didnt need to get the second nerf.

Very true 



LignoTestudon #5 Posted 06 August 2019 - 11:14 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 255
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014

View Postjellymonster0, on 17 July 2019 - 07:09 PM, said:

This tank has become obsolete after the 2nd nerf to 31 seconds reload, it is embarrassing! 

It was perfectly balanced at 24 seconds but nope gotta add an extra 7 seconds and that's after an already existing nerf of 3 seconds. 

It's gun handling is meh, low pen. 

The tier 9 is better tier for tier... should it really be like that??? No ofc not.

Defo needs a buff too 24/25 seconds.

 

Agreed.

Orbtastic1 #6 Posted 08 August 2019 - 08:13 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 41875 battles
  • 2,041
  • [UK]
  • Member since:
    02-15-2014

Naturally someone will have "looked at the data" and decided it was over-performing.

 

I wonder if they will do the same for the Machine? Doubt it, probably because they won't nerf those tanks and a different player base will play it, smoothing out the stats.



blazing_gamesyt #7 Posted 10 August 2019 - 04:06 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 6855 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    09-25-2016
I whole heartedly agree with you. It didn't need the 1st nerf never mind the second but because wargaming are such brilliant people with the company having a collective IQ of 2 they keep nerfing perfectly balanced tanks and then you take a look at the IS-7 that has been buffed more times than any other tank and the T57 heavy the tank that needs nerfing the most but because this is wargaming nothing will happen and they will release yet another t8 premium tank instead of doing something the community wants and if you voice your opinion on the matter you'll have your comment/post deleted because they can't handle the truth

jellymonster0 #8 Posted 12 August 2019 - 10:23 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16716 battles
  • 173
  • [M1N9]
  • Member since:
    10-29-2015

View Postblazing_gamesyt, on 10 August 2019 - 04:06 PM, said:

I whole heartedly agree with you. It didn't need the 1st nerf never mind the second but because wargaming are such brilliant people with the company having a collective IQ of 2 they keep nerfing perfectly balanced tanks and then you take a look at the IS-7 that has been buffed more times than any other tank and the T57 heavy the tank that needs nerfing the most but because this is wargaming nothing will happen and they will release yet another t8 premium tank instead of doing something the community wants and if you voice your opinion on the matter you'll have your comment/post deleted because they can't handle the truth

Yup litteraly pure facts right here 



TheTotalPackage7 #9 Posted 15 August 2019 - 09:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17420 battles
  • 77
  • [BLADA]
  • Member since:
    06-05-2016

I very seldom play this tank anymore. It needs either great penetration or a faster reload time.

Posted Image


Edited by TheTotalPackage7, 15 August 2019 - 09:30 PM.


jellymonster0 #10 Posted 16 August 2019 - 12:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16716 battles
  • 173
  • [M1N9]
  • Member since:
    10-29-2015

View PostTheTotalPackage7, on 15 August 2019 - 09:29 PM, said:

I very seldom play this tank anymore. It needs either great penetration or a faster reload time.

Posted Image

Very true



suDnd3th #11 Posted 26 August 2019 - 09:52 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9808 battles
  • 99
  • [2NDPD]
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013
Problem with WGs way of nerfing tanks like the TVP is its usually played by better players because of the skill level required of the tank to play it effective. Well when you have more skilled players playing a certain tank than potatoes playing it the so called stat performance is skewed since WG doesnt seem to get that concept that stats are easily changed based on which type of players are playing them.

Reason why there are certain tanks that never seem to get nerfed that need it badly cause the lemmings bring down their stats enough doing horribly in them. Give a horrible player a OP tank and they do ok. Give a good player a decent tank and they'll make it look like it needs a nerf.

 


XGR369er #12 Posted 23 September 2019 - 09:54 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 39935 battles
  • 588
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013
i just got this tank and started playing it and I have to agree  100%.  This thing is terrible all around especially compared to the tier 9 version.  I was wondering why this was so painful to play and then I figured out what everyone pointed out.  The reload time i just too long to be effective in a battle.  Shoot if they just had the same 3 shots and time as the tier 9 I would be happy.  That was just the right amount for me to do pretty well.  Every time i find myself in this tank.  I get off a shot or two then i am stuck trying to decide if I want to wait another 40 seconds to  load up again and by then i have always missed opportunities I would have been able to capitalize on.  As everyone else has said I wish WG would stop trying to nerf tanks so much to make crappy people feel good.

steelheadclan #13 Posted 26 September 2019 - 01:58 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 15385 battles
  • 5,275
  • [REAL]
  • Member since:
    03-05-2017

Make the TVP great again!

It should at least have the same reload time as the machine. 
That it doesn’t tells a lot about WGC current state. 


 


XGR369er #14 Posted 26 September 2019 - 05:39 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 39935 battles
  • 588
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

View Poststeelheadclan, on 26 September 2019 - 01:58 PM, said:

Make the TVP great again!

It should at least have the same reload time as the machine. 
That it doesn’t tells a lot about WGC current state. 

 

yes i can see why you don't see many on the battle field.  I am not sure what they are thinking at all.  I figure i am just going to stop playing mine until they do something if ever.

G32H #15 Posted 29 September 2019 - 03:38 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 31346 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    11-15-2016
I had just finished the grind to the TVP when they nerfed it.  I was really upset. Played about 30 battles and sold it for the silver.  It is still a sore spot for me and WOT.  Please take your medicine and fix the TVP!

HikenFly #16 Posted 29 September 2019 - 08:32 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10234 battles
  • 155
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

Let´s see when the 3rd nerf will come in. 

Maybe as well better players stop to play the TVP after the 2nd nerf and only unicums who love this tank continue to play.

As concequence the stats go up again and the omniscient datasheet tells the tank is OP and need another nerf.

On the other side potatoes play the Machine, stats go down and datasheet tells it needs a buff.

At the moment I play the Tier 9 and enjoy it, but based on all discussion, I think I will not buy the TVP.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users