Jump to content


Amx 30,B ;(


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

xXEdgierBikeXx #1 Posted 28 July 2019 - 05:09 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 8274 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

Why is the amx 30B so Bad why nerf especially the shell velocity etc. Its simply a bad like its cant perform on its own and not many play it.

The velocity used to be like 1500+ on normal shels as well other shels used to be better it used be able to compete in some way with lepord 1, but know its sh1t of a tank wthis going on nerfing tanks in game that not seen in firts place on battlefield. I dont have it but my freind is upset and simply want arise the issues as a mediam player.



fozfactor #2 Posted 07 August 2019 - 09:39 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 59035 battles
  • 2,398
  • Member since:
    12-23-2013
Since they un-nerfed the reload time and slightly de-nerfed the accuracy with the update patch, with the minor (but noticeable) buff in turret armor a return to the old shell velocity is all this tank really needs to be pretty decent.

non nobis solum


Proofsand #3 Posted 08 August 2019 - 07:38 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 482 battles
  • 5
  • Member since:
    07-06-2019
This tank always on percent 10 was worse than a leopard, these tanks do not suit average players, for a game on them the high skill is necessary

Funktastic Ed #4 Posted 08 August 2019 - 09:24 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 18996 battles
  • 700
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

View PostProofsand, on 08 August 2019 - 07:38 AM, said:

This tank always on percent 10 was worse than a leopard, these tanks do not suit average players, for a game on them the high skill is necessary

 

Definition of a bad tank.

Take the same "high skill" players and put them in 430II U or a BC25t and you'll see what they can do in real good tank.


"Idiots dare everything, that's how you really know they are."

anonym_H8iHAPaj1kSx #5 Posted 09 August 2019 - 02:08 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 1,395
  • Member since:
    11-18-2019
Because it was a difficult, but not too bad, tank to play and it attracted better players as it was a bit more of a challenge to perform well.  But those players could still get high damage scores. Hence, as seen on an spreadsheet, it would appear that the tank was performing too well and needed a nerf

LignoTestudon #6 Posted 10 August 2019 - 02:56 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 296
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014

View PostImproved Aus, on 09 August 2019 - 09:08 AM, said:

Because it was a difficult, but not too bad, tank to play and it attracted better players as it was a bit more of a challenge to perform well. But those players could still get high damage scores. Hence, as seen on an spreadsheet, it would appear that the tank was performing too well and needed a nerf

 

I have always liked the upgraded turret of the AMX 30 1er prototype and its 105mm gun, but it's not too bad of a tank as well. That's one of the hardest tanks that should be proceeded and played with caution.

Huncho_Mystic #7 Posted 10 August 2019 - 07:58 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11415 battles
  • 1,150
  • [ELDER]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2016
The simple ask is a return of the shell velocity to the tier 9 and 10- it made the tanks fun to play

TROCKS #8 Posted 04 September 2019 - 12:58 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 16853 battles
  • 33
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2015
They need to restore the pen and the shell velocity. There was absolutely no reason to nerf the pen on the tank.

Col Bastos #9 Posted 28 October 2019 - 04:10 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 15547 battles
  • 261
  • [-OAS-]
  • Member since:
    08-20-2013

This tank is too slow !!!

 

Bad targeting, bad pen and shell is very very slow, i play it only with prem ammo and in boucne always, the precision in weak spot is bad too.

 

Reload is good, but the shell is too slow...You must anticipate always and on fast med or light it's impossible to hit !

 

Play as sniper only !






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users