hexine, on 10 August 2019 - 12:35 AM, said:
rng keeps the game interesting, all good players can operate with it, wanting to remove it indicates you are a bad player who cant' deal with changing variables
actually.....hmm....same with +2-2 MM.....so i see a pattern here
git gud
It's just a discussion... and in my opionion RNG is just like gambling gameplay. And 25% RNG on precision, penetration and damage is a lot of gambling.
Why don't you just bring an argument why 25% variance on penetration is totally realistic and makes sense (of course apart from angled armor and shot range).
I think a bit of RNG is ok and realistic, especially on precision... but 25% is a lot.
Looks like Wargaming is also thinking about this topic, otherwise they wouldn't make these test events... right?
And I know the WOT community is salty as f***... Mr. Lowtier Driver, but no reason to call somebody a bad player just because of an opinion...
Sure I admit that I'm not a great player and far from Unicum... but being called a "bad player" from somebody
who played 23k battles in tier 5 tanks (average) and was only able to achive 1,4k is just ridiculous 
Can't even take someone serious who only owns 4 tier10 tanks and one of them is arty 