Jump to content


We all know whoes gonna win :(


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

ABAOUIA #1 Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:09 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 47049 battles
  • 5,789
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015

So GG Immortals for being top clan, again.

 

I wish they would take the averadge in stead of total result.

 

At least other clans would have a Virtual chance, now it's just a Numbers game.

 

Worth looking into this WG imo.



John Arrowsmith #2 Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:14 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 79224 battles
  • 16,180
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Perhaps the solo players should be tallied up.

World of tanks Auto lock edition,  because aiming shouldn't be a skill.

 

 

 


Shockwave IIC #3 Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:17 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 17976 battles
  • 2,894
  • [-PA-]
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

Didn't help that they consolidated 2-3 other clans in to them last time.

 

EDIT

They didn't change the points system either..... Pass


Edited by Shockwave IIC, 14 August 2019 - 01:18 PM.

Chaffee ***, M10 Wolverine ***, Hellcat **, Fury **, Easy 8 ***, M6 ***, T29 ***, T71 **, T69 **, Comet I IT34 **, T34 85 ** T150 ***, KV4 **, VK30.01D III III III, VK30.01M III III, VK30.02D III III, Tiger P III III,

http://forum-console...our-average-joe

 


M4ntiX #4 Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:54 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 30075 battles
  • 4,258
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014

View PostABAOUIA, on 14 August 2019 - 01:09 PM, said:

So GG Immortals for being top clan, again.

 

I wish they would take the averadge in stead of total result.

 

At least other clans would have a Virtual chance, now it's just a Numbers game.

 

Worth looking into this WG imo.

 

If the article is still valid, then it is the average they're considering and not the sum of earned points.

 

"During this competition, there will be two categories in which Clans can compete for lots of awesome prizes. In each category the top 3winners will be scored regarding their:

  • Highest average ranked battle points earned by participating members.
  • Highest average win rate by its participating members."

* MY TEAM IS ALWAYS MADE BY MONGOL TRISOMIC STYLE PLAY LIKE NO BRAIN! *

* I live in reality and let me tell you, there is no one here. * For some reason you feel the need to troll stink bomb a statement of fact. *

* 4 kids single father 2 boats a plane 3cars and more battles than you. * Jesus you smegheads are whiny about your Epeens. *


ABAOUIA #5 Posted 14 August 2019 - 03:05 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 47049 battles
  • 5,789
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015

View PostM4ntiX, on 14 August 2019 - 02:54 PM, said:

 

If the article is still valid, then it is the average they're considering and not the sum of earned points.

 

"During this competition, there will be two categories in which Clans can compete for lots of awesome prizes. In each category the top 3winners will be scored regarding their:

  • Highest average ranked battle points earned by participating members.
  • Highest average win rate by its participating members."

 

Stand corrected on the spot lol

 

This was not the case in the privious one, wich i found a very dissapointing lack of insight.

 

Happy they updated it, Cheers WG

 

Better late then never i guess :hiding:



ABAOUIA #6 Posted 14 August 2019 - 03:07 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 47049 battles
  • 5,789
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015
Btw i hooe they made a min number of players a clan to be active for an averadge.

Otherwise 1 player 1 clan and it's "cheatable" again lol


MaxChaos24 #7 Posted 14 August 2019 - 03:22 PM

    Gameplay Expert

  • Administrator
  • 13293 battles
  • 21,039
  • [WGW]
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013

View PostABAOUIA, on 14 August 2019 - 11:07 AM, said:

Btw i hooe they made a min number of players a clan to be active for an averadge.

Otherwise 1 player 1 clan and it's "cheatable" again lol

 

There was and is a minimum (5), check out the article for details. 

 

View PostABAOUIA, on 14 August 2019 - 11:05 AM, said:

 

Stand corrected on the spot lol

 

This was not the case in the privious one, wich i found a very dissapointing lack of insight.

 

Happy they updated it, Cheers WG

 

Better late then never i guess :hiding:

 

FWIW, it wasn't a lack of insight. The first one was providing a category for big clans to fight over (Total Points) and one that allowed for smaller clans to participate in (avg win rate). So that clans of all sizes had something for them. We did change it to average for both this time to see how it works out. I'm sure there will be additional tweaks needed as we see the results and go through the feedback. :great:

ABAOUIA #8 Posted 14 August 2019 - 03:44 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 47049 battles
  • 5,789
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015
Sorry Max, I Didn't read the article cause I ain't playing Ranked this weekend due to other priorities.

My bad on that.

But the averadge comment remains valid, simply because when you create a contest you should always check the options on how it can be "rigged".

Why do you think clans bundled up, just to play the Numbers game, wich i can't complain about, cause that was how the game is setup.

But good thing that got adjusted +1

Have fun yall :)


smotedown318 #9 Posted 14 August 2019 - 04:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34441 battles
  • 157
  • [YOMA]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 14 August 2019 - 09:22 AM, said:

 

There was and is a minimum (5), check out the article for details. 

 

 

FWIW, it wasn't a lack of insight. The first one was providing a category for big clans to fight over (Total Points) and one that allowed for smaller clans to participate in (avg win rate). So that clans of all sizes had something for them. We did change it to average for both this time to see how it works out. I'm sure there will be additional tweaks needed as we see the results and go through the feedback. :great:

 

but you still haven't addressed the point earn loss problems. IE to much XP for enemy spotted at start of game, time survived giving to much XP. instead of the focus being on damage and kills. also winning team should be +200 for 1st +150 for second and losing team +150 for top +50 for 2nd
51 total. 3 marked tanks --- M4, M4A3E8, M4A3E2, T20, T69, T54E1,  pershing, M46 patton, M24 chaffee, T71 DA, M41 Walker Bulldog, T14, T29, T32, T34, M103, T110E5, M18 Hellcat, T25/2, T30, ------ Cromwell, Comet, Conquer, FV215B,  ------ AMX ELC bis, AMX CDC, lorraine 40 t, AMX 50 100, ------ VK 16.02 Leopard, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Indien-panzer, Leopard prototype A, Waffenträger auf Pz. IV, Tiger 1 hammer, tiger II, E75, E100,------ Motherland, object 430 version II, KV-2, KV-3, fatherland IS-3A, KV-4, IS-3, T-10, ST-I,  IS-7, ------ Skoda T 25, ------ Type 59,

MaxChaos24 #10 Posted 14 August 2019 - 04:29 PM

    Gameplay Expert

  • Administrator
  • 13293 battles
  • 21,039
  • [WGW]
  • Member since:
    09-15-2013

View Postsmotedown318, on 14 August 2019 - 12:26 PM, said:

 

but you still haven't addressed the point earn loss problems. IE to much XP for enemy spotted at start of game, time survived giving to much XP. instead of the focus being on damage and kills. also winning team should be +200 for 1st +150 for second and losing team +150 for top +50 for 2nd

 

Huh?

SteampunkPagan #11 Posted 14 August 2019 - 04:29 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 94112 battles
  • 7,755
  • [HDC-R]
  • Member since:
    08-09-2013

View PostMaxChaos24, on 14 August 2019 - 10:22 AM, said:

 

There was and is a minimum (5), check out the article for details. 

 

 

FWIW, it wasn't a lack of insight. The first one was providing a category for big clans to fight over (Total Points) and one that allowed for smaller clans to participate in (avg win rate). So that clans of all sizes had something for them. We did change it to average for both this time to see how it works out. I'm sure there will be additional tweaks needed as we see the results and go through the feedback. :great:

Hello Max,

I am sure this idea will go nowhere because it will be very unpopular. For events such as this be they competitive clans or social clans I honestly think clans should mean something & clan hoping for events needs to end in my opinion...Anyway here is my two cents:

1) Make Clans Mean Something by Locking Membership & Clan creation 3 days before any clan related event.

2) Events that uses "averages" should include ALL clan members whether they participate or not.

 

Thanks,

SPP


“Who shot him? I asked. The grey man scratched the back of his neck and said: Somebody with a gun.” ― Dashiell Hammett, Red Harvest

"Arrête! C'est ici l'empire de la Mort"

"Si vis pacem, para bellum"


John-berg1995 #12 Posted 14 August 2019 - 05:23 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12679 battles
  • 2,914
  • [CIA]
  • Member since:
    12-05-2015

View PostABAOUIA, on 14 August 2019 - 03:07 PM, said:

Btw i hooe they made a min number of players a clan to be active for an averadge.

Otherwise 1 player 1 clan and it's "cheatable" again lol

I was recently features on their news page as my clan being the second highest average exp on PS4 and yet I'm the only member in my clan :D 



ABAOUIA #13 Posted 14 August 2019 - 06:08 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 47049 battles
  • 5,789
  • [ASYLM]
  • Member since:
    03-09-2015

View PostJohn-berg1995, on 14 August 2019 - 06:23 PM, said:

I was recently features on their news page as my clan being the second highest average exp on PS4 and yet I'm the only member in my clan :D 

 

Lol Yeah i read that, but your not the only 1 man clan ;)



x_BAlN_x #14 Posted 14 August 2019 - 06:53 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 60524 battles
  • 2,404
  • Member since:
    03-02-2016

View PostJohn-berg1995, on 14 August 2019 - 11:23 AM, said:

I was recently features on their news page as my clan being the second highest average exp on PS4 and yet I'm the only member in my clan :D 

 

Are you C - lower case L -A? Or is the other ClA that?

l R3KSIO l #15 Posted 14 August 2019 - 08:19 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 11349 battles
  • 64
  • [TRNDO]
  • Member since:
    01-21-2018
gona try get the 1st place prizing again. got a solid team of top players for the avg points. should be another easy win :)

M4ntiX #16 Posted 14 August 2019 - 09:49 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 30075 battles
  • 4,258
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    03-18-2014

View Postl R3KSIO l, on 14 August 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

gona try get the 1st place prizing again. got a solid team of top players for the avg points. should be another easy win :)

 

Oh and here we go. Trying to cheat the system again? I see you've already created a new clan. Let me guess, 5 players that are all super unis and guaranteed to earn tons of points for the average to be astronomical, or will you simply run your 5 alt accounts in one clan and do it all yourself? Hell, why not. This new structure is asking for it. :D Good luck!

* MY TEAM IS ALWAYS MADE BY MONGOL TRISOMIC STYLE PLAY LIKE NO BRAIN! *

* I live in reality and let me tell you, there is no one here. * For some reason you feel the need to troll stink bomb a statement of fact. *

* 4 kids single father 2 boats a plane 3cars and more battles than you. * Jesus you smegheads are whiny about your Epeens. *


John-berg1995 #17 Posted 15 August 2019 - 07:03 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12679 battles
  • 2,914
  • [CIA]
  • Member since:
    12-05-2015

View Postx_BAlN_x, on 14 August 2019 - 06:53 PM, said:

 

Are you C - lower case L -A? Or is the other ClA that?

I'm C eye A , the guy who made C"L"A wanted CIA but I nabbed it the second clans where buyable on PS4,  

 

There is an old PC clan called CIA and what I didn't know at the time because I was still new was that they where a seal clubbing clan. And when I killed their platoon of T-127s in my own T-127 they recruited. And I joined. 

 

Turns out they are crazy! They have it so you have to play 250 battles per month in the T-127 

 

Oh and you can't play solo. You have to play with 2 other members, 1 has to be an officer 

 

And the only people who can be officers are people with actual military backgrounds, 

 

I got bored with them after I found out I was just stat padding and wanted to get away from them. So I could actually get better instead of artificially making my stats look good. 

 

Tho this was back when the T-127 was the king of tier 3, 

 

They even had special YouTube videos. That only members could see. Showing you how to penetrate tier 4 tanks in case you ran into them. like hetzer, Matilda, amx-40, and so on. 

 

Oh. They also made me download a map reskin that had a yellow path imprented on every single map

 

This path in fact was the supposed "safest" and "fastest" rout to the enemy cap without taking damage. we would follow the path without deviating or we would get penalized and probably banned, we would rush the cap and triple cap the secure the win. As fast as humanly possible lol because all they cared about was having a high winrate. 

 

The clan was quite infamous. They had well over 100 members. when they reached the clan limit it became CIA2..3...4 excetera excetera, 

 

anytime I played at tier 10 i would get some snarky guy in the chat "...what?? a CIA member outside of tier 3??" Lol, that's also when I started to realize that CIA had made a name for it's self. For better or for worse people feared seeing us on the enemy team lol at least in tier 3 games. The leaders of CIA made us watch videos that showed the best way to win every single map for every single game mode. It became like clockworks and soon my winrate in the T-127 was 89% at some 560 battles lol

 

you're probably wondering why I would name my clan after such a weird and strict clan. 

 

I don't really know I don't plan on starting an uprising at tier 3 :D I just didn't know what to pick

 

. tho I don't trust many people to represent the clan so I'm running solo until I find someone who is of equal or better skill than me. 



John Arrowsmith #18 Posted 15 August 2019 - 07:13 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 79224 battles
  • 16,180
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

View Postl R3KSIO l, on 14 August 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

gona try get the 1st place prizing again. got a solid team of top players for the avg points. should be another easy win :)

 

when you say top players,  do you mean top players or rerolls who won't play tanks that have a negative effect on the almighty WN8?

World of tanks Auto lock edition,  because aiming shouldn't be a skill.

 

 

 


Pit Friend #19 Posted 15 August 2019 - 10:29 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33588 battles
  • 18,645
  • [PTATO]
  • Member since:
    07-14-2014

View PostJohn Arrowsmith, on 15 August 2019 - 02:13 AM, said:

 

when you say top players,  do you mean top players or rerolls who won't play tanks that have a negative effect on the almighty WN8?

 

Top. Men. 

 

 

:trollface:


When the nice guy loses his patience the devil shivers. 


smotedown318 #20 Posted 28 August 2019 - 02:24 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34441 battles
  • 157
  • [YOMA]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2014

View PostMaxChaos24, on 14 August 2019 - 10:29 AM, said:

 

Huh?

 

points are winning +100 +100 for 1st +100 +50 for second +100 for the rest loosing 1st +150 -100 2nd +50 -100 the rest -100. and the survived time, if you see 2 tanks got the about the same damage and the same kill count , shooting at the same tanks but 1 had a LOOT more XP and the only difference was he survived longer it makes one think you are getting XP for time survived. and the XP form spotting was from when karalia was the only map and clan players I know where just running T100LT getting 5-6 spotts 1-2K damage 1-2 kills about, 1/2 the damage and kills of several other tanks, and taking top almost every time,
51 total. 3 marked tanks --- M4, M4A3E8, M4A3E2, T20, T69, T54E1,  pershing, M46 patton, M24 chaffee, T71 DA, M41 Walker Bulldog, T14, T29, T32, T34, M103, T110E5, M18 Hellcat, T25/2, T30, ------ Cromwell, Comet, Conquer, FV215B,  ------ AMX ELC bis, AMX CDC, lorraine 40 t, AMX 50 100, ------ VK 16.02 Leopard, VK 30.01 D, VK 30.02 M, Indien-panzer, Leopard prototype A, Waffenträger auf Pz. IV, Tiger 1 hammer, tiger II, E75, E100,------ Motherland, object 430 version II, KV-2, KV-3, fatherland IS-3A, KV-4, IS-3, T-10, ST-I,  IS-7, ------ Skoda T 25, ------ Type 59,




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users