Jump to content


Tank trade-in T32-A


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

XERXEZS #21 Posted 20 August 2019 - 06:18 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 25886 battles
  • 2,337
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

View PostKuruh, on 19 August 2019 - 05:17 PM, said:

So i noticed the T32-A is on the trade-in event and wanted to know a few things.

 

1. Is it a good tank? Been messed up pretty bad by it on the battle field.

2. is the fatherland a good trade for it? i only have to put 3,836 gold with it for the T32-A which i got the gold for free from the ops.

 

What's everyone's opinion on it i would like to hear 

Spoiler

 

Yes the T32-A is a safe bet, it's very fun, remember you are a "support tank", stand behind the brawling heavies or hull down and unload clip, creep back and reload. 

T32-A vs the Fatherland, the Fatherland can carry as a brawler heavy, but I can see that if you want to change it up a little bit it's fine to get the T32-A just be patient with it. 



XERXEZS #22 Posted 20 August 2019 - 06:23 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 25886 battles
  • 2,337
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

View PostTtone5722, on 19 August 2019 - 06:37 PM, said:

I want to make that deal soooo bad for my IS-6, but its the last tier 8 Russian heavy premium that I have. Traded the Fatherland last time for something.

What's a garage without a premium Russian heavy at tier 8? Plus I have the T34 and the Patriot already for 'Murica.Thought about trading the T34 but that was my first tier 8 prem. Feels nostalgic even though its outclassed by everything now. So is the IS-6 lol.

Decisions, decisions.

The T34 is slow and has extremely low dpm of 1600 but it has a big gun and big turret armor perfect for hull down even vs tier X just don't take hesh hits from the FV215b 183 or similar hesh rounds. 



R35T NO MORE #23 Posted 20 August 2019 - 06:29 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 16093 battles
  • 23,185
  • [BNKR-]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2013
A platoon of them is hilarious to play. 

My WoT tank reviews

If you enjoy them please do share/sub. Thanks. 


FusionStar287 #24 Posted 20 August 2019 - 06:52 AM

    Major

  • WoTC Ambassador
  • 20400 battles
  • 16,426
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostSightlessRogue0, on 20 August 2019 - 01:08 AM, said:

 

Best heavy tank ? Yes, after :

Kirovet-1/ scourge

OBJ 252u

lowe

Is3

Tiger II

Chrysler

IS5 

T32 TT

and some other... no ?

I said one of the best, not the best. Even so, I'd argue that the T32 is easily better than the IS-3, IS-5, Lowe, Tiger II, and possibly even the Chrysler K.


"My dear brothers, take note of this: Men should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry, for man's anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires." ~ James 1: 19-20

 

"wefWEGFRF" - RaiBOT01, 2017


ElderTigerJedi #25 Posted 20 August 2019 - 10:11 AM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 21594 battles
  • 296
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    09-05-2015
I’m interested in this swap , fatherland for proto 

SightlessRogue0 #26 Posted 20 August 2019 - 01:11 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19872 battles
  • 2,828
  • Member since:
    05-16-2017

View PostFusionStar287, on 20 August 2019 - 06:52 AM, said:

I said one of the best, not the best. Even so, I'd argue that the T32 is easily better than the IS-3, IS-5, Lowe, Tiger II, and possibly even the Chrysler K.

 

The problem I have with the proto T32A is that its light tank armor does not justify its lack of mobility, you really have to hide and avoid any engagement unless the enemy is busy with someone. If someone targets you you can not avoid receiving the shot even if he is a big Russian with 3.5 seconds to aim before shooting and no accuracy. A lot of game under the 500points of damage.

 

In this tank your WinRate only depends on your team ... you have a WR of 55%, it's because the teams played for 55%, not you. You have a WR of 45% .... same thing. I am currently learning to use it but sometimes it is really painful.


Edited by SightlessRogue0, 20 August 2019 - 01:13 PM.

I use Google translator for english language

Lots of juggling in french text, sometimes translator in trouble with that. If you do not understand what I write, tell me.


USSWISCONSIN94 #27 Posted 20 August 2019 - 01:17 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12176 battles
  • 27,934
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostSightlessRogue0, on 20 August 2019 - 08:11 AM, said:

 

The problem I have with the proto T32A is that its light tank armor does not justify its lack of mobility, you really have to hide and avoid any engagement unless the enemy is busy with someone. If someone targets you you can not avoid receiving the shot even if he is a big Russian with 3.5 seconds to aim before shooting and no accuracy. A lot of game under the 500points of damage.

 

In this tank your WinRate only depends on your team ... you have a WR of 55%, it's because the teams played for 55%, not you. You have a WR of 45% .... same thing. I am currently learning to use it but sometimes it is really painful.

 

This. It's armor is pitiful and really not worth that part but the gun is nice. the better turret wouldn't make it OP even if you buffed the engine to 760 (T32 and T29 both get it) 

View PostFusionStar287, on 19 August 2019 - 11:15 PM, said:

The T32 really doesn't need a buff though, especially considering that it's already one of the best tier VIII heavy tanks.

 

think the 105mm should get higher alpha tbh. this would make it a little more better

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


PrimalSeal1965 #28 Posted 20 August 2019 - 01:39 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 11077 battles
  • 570
  • [RETRO]
  • Member since:
    05-04-2016

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 19 August 2019 - 09:26 PM, said:

 

Pershing's turret is trash though. (mantle doesn't count) as both tanks are the same design (overall) It wouldn't be OP by giving it the better turret.

 

I have to agree the Pershing is a pretty bad tank or it seems so on console. Seems like a swarm of gnats will pen it! 

USSWISCONSIN94 #29 Posted 20 August 2019 - 01:56 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12176 battles
  • 27,934
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostPrimalSeal1965, on 20 August 2019 - 08:39 AM, said:

 

I have to agree the Pershing is a pretty bad tank or it seems so on console. Seems like a swarm of gnats will pen it! 

 

It's not a bad tank. but the "armor" on it is a joke.

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Tempest fox3 #30 Posted 20 August 2019 - 02:53 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 21023 battles
  • 18,387
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 20 August 2019 - 01:17 PM, said:

 

This. It's armor is pitiful and really not worth that part but the gun is nice. the better turret wouldn't make it OP even if you buffed the engine to 760 (T32 and T29 both get it) 

 

think the 105mm should get higher alpha tbh. this would make it a little more better

 

I find it amusing that you always complain about overpowered tanks being added to the game. Yet here you are advocating buffs for two tanks, neither of which need it and at least one of them would become Incredibly overpowered if given said buffs. 


War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.

3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32, Tiger 131, Skoda T25 - In order obtained

 

Spoiler

USSWISCONSIN94 #31 Posted 20 August 2019 - 03:06 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12176 battles
  • 27,934
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostTempest fox3, on 20 August 2019 - 09:53 AM, said:

 

I find it amusing that you always complain about overpowered tanks being added to the game. Yet here you are advocating buffs for two tanks, neither of which need it and at least one of them would become Incredibly overpowered if given said buffs. 

 

Go whine to someone else then. T32 is a great tank now but giving it the hull of the E1 wouldn't make it OP as who shoots their anyway. As for the T32A it could use a buff as the turret is butter and isn't worth trying to be aggressive at all unless you are top tier or when bottom tier and no one wants to pay attention to you. Giving it some kind of armor and maybe a better engine wouldn't make the most OP tank in the game. sit down and whine to someone else for a change. 

 

 

Complain about me asking for a buff. nice meme Tempt once again.


http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


JelliedPenny08 #32 Posted 20 August 2019 - 04:21 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 16200 battles
  • 4,526
  • Member since:
    06-07-2014

View PostUSSWISCONSIN94, on 20 August 2019 - 01:17 PM, said:

 

This. It's armor is pitiful and really not worth that part but the gun is nice. the better turret wouldn't make it OP even if you buffed the engine to 760 (T32 and T29 both get it) 

 

think the 105mm should get higher alpha tbh. this would make it a little more better

 

I would be happy with a thick mantlet on the T32A. The turret doesn't have to be impenetrable, but it would be nice to troll the snapshots and distance shots flung at you a bit more while you make sure that it's aimed in all the way. 

USSWISCONSIN94 #33 Posted 20 August 2019 - 04:30 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 12176 battles
  • 27,934
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostJelliedPenny08, on 20 August 2019 - 11:21 AM, said:

 

I would be happy with a thick mantlet on the T32A. The turret doesn't have to be impenetrable, but it would be nice to troll the snapshots and distance shots flung at you a bit more while you make sure that it's aimed in all the way. 

 

better than the paper it has now. i bounced maybe 2 shots since i got the thing and it really made of butter with that turret. the hull is decent but nothing special 

http://www.wotinfo.n...N94&server=xbox

youtube.com/channel/UCkXtmp3Ikozzl-K73GuxxNQ

 

Will WG ever have WoT offline like they promised?


Kuruh #34 Posted 21 August 2019 - 02:55 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 22311 battles
  • 61
  • [AUTS]
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014
Okay thank you guy's i made up my mind after heavily thinking about i traded my fatherland in, I only had 59 games in it and ive had it since the first event to earn it smh geez it was just a garage filler all these years good riddance.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users