3
This topic is locked
Major
i just topped the table in a tier 10 game. i was one of the few tier 8's.
i ended up killing one of the tier 10 Lights. the entire match consisted of hiding, staying out of the fight, trying to get the occasional sneaky shot off when it was clear.
its a garbage, dull, boring way to play this game. it turns the game into work rather than fun. just get it over with WarGaming, switch WoT over to +1 already.
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
Edited by Wroclaw, 22 October 2019 - 10:39 PM.
Captain
Wroclaw, on 22 October 2019 - 04:38 PM, said:
i just topped the table in a tier 10 game. i was one of the few tier 8's.
i ended up killing one of the tier 10 Lights. the entire match consisted of hiding, staying out of the fight, trying to get the occasional sneaky shot off when it was clear.
its a garbage, dull, boring way to play this game. it turns the game into work rather than fun. just get it over with WarGaming, switch WoT over to +1 already.
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
Your T22 Prototype and Pz38H still have the same +1/-1 matchmaking you like.
"you've made your fanboy status and unwillingness to admit anything other than Sony sucks and Microsoft are gods clear do you have any actual point beyond that though"
Yes-Man Wargaming Shill-Bot Since 2014
Major
Hypocrite, on 22 October 2019 - 10:46 PM, said:
Your T22 Prototype and Pz38H still have the same +1/-1 matchmaking you like.
2016 wants its criticism back.
Major
CatSnipah, on 22 October 2019 - 10:51 PM, said:
Yet it still holds true for you in 2019. Go figure.
the last game i played in the T22 was 2016. so no.
is this what this forum is, a Troll bridge. is everyone here living under it.
Major
Red Dough Boy, on 22 October 2019 - 10:53 PM, said:
Maybe they should fix matchmaking in general and not give us easy mode temporarily.
You can keep +1/-1 below tier 5.
So much this, +2-2 isn't the problem. Team balancing and the way the matchmaker handles platoons is.
War is a Democracy and the enemy always gets a vote.
3 MoE's: E-25, M41 Walker Bulldog, E-50, Snakebite, E-75, T32, Tiger 131, Skoda T25, Boilermaker- In order obtained
Major
Major
Wroclaw, on 23 October 2019 - 12:34 AM, said:
the last game i played in the T22 was 2016. so no.
is this what this forum is, a Troll bridge. is everyone here living under it.
Is just an elephant graveyard, just as this game is.
Major
Tempest fox3, on 22 October 2019 - 11:40 PM, said:
So much this, +2-2 isn't the problem. Team balancing and the way the matchmaker handles platoons is.
balancing the game is a separate issue to the problems the MM gives us
+1 has nothing to do with MM issues. theres no need to constantly bring it up when discussing +1 versus +2
+2 is fundamentally unbalanced. the game is far more balanced as +1
Major
Wroclaw, on 22 October 2019 - 11:50 PM, said:
+2 is fundamentally unbalanced. the game is far more balanced as +1
Except, it isn't.....
A majority of the tanks are designed for +/2. Because, well, you know, that's like been the mm design since beta and stuff. Actually, it was an even larger spread back then....
Major
CatSnipah, on 22 October 2019 - 11:54 PM, said:
Except, it isn't.....
A majority of the tanks are designed for +/2. Because, well, you know, that's like been the mm design since beta and stuff. Actually, it was an even larger spread back then....
i know your not thick, so why post like you are.
shooting at a +2 tank is not "more balanced" than shooting the same type of tank that is only 1 tier higher. that its been this way since launch proves nothing about balance. the most balanced this game could be is +/-0
there is a bunch of tanks that have +2 MM, but they have no business facing those tanks. the game is worse off for having +2.
Edited by Wroclaw, 23 October 2019 - 12:09 AM.
Captain
Some tanks don't do well -2 but for the most part +2-2 isn't the problem it's made out to be.
ChubbyBuckle06
Captain
Sammael85, on 23 October 2019 - 07:47 AM, said:
Hahahahaha! C'mon say you like the +1/-1 , lol on first comment though.
Major
LiteralComic635, on 22 October 2019 - 07:08 PM, said:
Some tanks don't do well -2 but for the most part +2-2 isn't the problem it's made out to be.
ChubbyBuckle06
Right. Why change MM for 100% of the tanks because less than 20% of them struggle when -2 30% of the time.
"Stop it with all the negative waves..." Oddball
Major
Wroclaw, on 23 October 2019 - 12:04 AM, said:
i know your not thick, so why post like you are.
shooting at a +2 tank is not "more balanced" than shooting the same type of tank that is only 1 tier higher. that its been this way since launch proves nothing about balance. the most balanced this game could be is +/-0
there is a bunch of tanks that have +2 MM, but they have no business facing those tanks. the game is worse off for having +2.
I may not be a smart man, but I know the difference between “your” and “you’re”.....
Captain
Wroclaw, on 22 October 2019 - 10:38 PM, said:
i just topped the table in a tier 10 game. i was one of the few tier 8's.
i ended up killing one of the tier 10 Lights. the entire match consisted of hiding, staying out of the fight, trying to get the occasional sneaky shot off when it was clear.
its a garbage, dull, boring way to play this game. it turns the game into work rather than fun. just get it over with WarGaming, switch WoT over to +1 already.
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
+2 sucks
Another boring argument in favor of simpleton mode.
You had to use cover? Oh, the horror of actually playing properly!
Major
Wroclaw, on 22 October 2019 - 10:38 PM, said:
(...) i was one of the few tier 8's... <- too much of a challenge?
(...) the entire match consisted of hiding, staying out of the fight.... 
(...) its a garbage, dull, boring way to play this game <- Yeah, it's also how you chose to play it!
Something tells me matchmaking isn't the problem here... We get it, the game is too hard for you. Perhaps it's time to move on?
You can click on my e-peen:
"No one in history has ever been insulted into agreement." - Arthur Brooks
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
