Jump to content


Would a permanent +1 -1 benefit Wargaming or hurt it?

MM PMM

  • Please log in to reply
116 replies to this topic

Poll: Would Permanent +1 -1 Benefit or Hurt WoT? (135 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 50 battles in order to participate this poll.

Would Permanent +1 -1 Benefit or Hurt WoT?

  1. It would bring in more players, satisfaction, & revenue for WoT (99 votes [73.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 73.33%

  2. It would have a more negative effect with people leaving the game (36 votes [26.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.67%

Aside from how it affects Wargaming, would you prefer +1 -1?

  1. Yes (96 votes [71.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.11%

  2. No (39 votes [28.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.89%

Vote Hide poll

El Materdor43 #101 Posted 10 November 2019 - 02:17 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33442 battles
  • 8,883
  • [HACKS]
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014

View Postmatematicalone, on 10 November 2019 - 06:47 AM, said:

Cousin Billy's reaction when he heard that poll about +-1 mm on forum is worthless.

Kung-Fu Billy is awesome. There are several YouTube vids of him 

 

:D


   

 

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                 

 


killer etzi0 #102 Posted 10 November 2019 - 02:49 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 58914 battles
  • 18,827
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    06-20-2014

View PostT00_Late_Checkm8, on 09 November 2019 - 06:58 PM, said:

 

"the end of WoT as we know it..."

 

drama queen.

 

Well... actually ur right, it would be the end of WoT as we know it but then its just better and more fair.

 

How is +1/-1 any more "fair" than +2/-2?    Easier yes, more "fair"... i dont think so.

 

And, on a side note, for the life of me I do not understand why anyone plays tanks at tier V or above with stock guns :child:


"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat."

 

Ronald Reagan
 

 


El Materdor43 #103 Posted 10 November 2019 - 03:07 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33442 battles
  • 8,883
  • [HACKS]
  • Member since:
    03-02-2014

View PostT00_Late_Checkm8, on 09 November 2019 - 07:58 PM, said:

 

"the end of WoT as we know it..."

 

drama queen.

 

Well... actually ur right, it would be the end of WoT as we know it but then its just better and more fair.

What he was referring to, the end of WOT as we know it, was a reference to the infamous Update 1.3.  It was basically a across the board Nerf to the German line. It was not well received then as it prompted an Update 1.3.1 that reversed some, of not all, of the nerfs. 
 

That is the reference to the end of WOT


   

 

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                 

 


deadman1921 #104 Posted 10 November 2019 - 03:10 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29349 battles
  • 1,739
  • [-STO-]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014
Make loaded dice permanent.

Soldiers of the One/ #GlenIsOurs

 


Pit Friend #105 Posted 10 November 2019 - 05:14 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 33578 battles
  • 18,631
  • [PTATO]
  • Member since:
    07-14-2014

View Postdeadman1921, on 10 November 2019 - 10:10 AM, said:

Make loaded dice permanent.

 

No, that’s the worst thing they’ve done in a while. Unless they change it to 10% RNG instead of 0%. With 0% you get things like if the penetration is 1mm better than the armor it always penetrates while if it’s 1mm less it never does. 

When the nice guy loses his patience the devil shivers. 


miju irl #106 Posted 11 November 2019 - 02:44 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17107 battles
  • 592
  • [IRL]
  • Member since:
    07-18-2015

74% think it will bring new players. That of course is despite the fact that twice during the events numbers didnt go up.

 

-1/+1 is like arty nerfs. never going to happen 



JatemKaa #107 Posted 11 November 2019 - 07:43 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62379 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014

View PostJohn Arrowsmith, on 10 November 2019 - 05:15 AM, said:

 

The same problems will exist with +1,   why waste resources implementing something that doesn't fix any of the issues instead of a really trying to solve the issues that need to be addressed.

Highlighted part says it all. WG has shown by their current and past actions they are not going to REALLY TRY TO  SOLVE the needs to be addressed - it is within the realm of possibility they MIGHT actually do the +1/-1 based on the half-hearted measures they have done in the past.


Edited by JatemKaa, 11 November 2019 - 07:47 PM.


JatemKaa #108 Posted 11 November 2019 - 07:45 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62379 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014

View PostPit Friend, on 10 November 2019 - 11:14 AM, said:

 

No, that’s the worst thing they’ve done in a while. Unless they change it to 10% RNG instead of 0%. With 0% you get things like if the penetration is 1mm better than the armor it always penetrates while if it’s 1mm less it never does. 

 

Agree. A 10% RNG seems much more reasonable than 0% or 25%.

JatemKaa #109 Posted 11 November 2019 - 07:47 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62379 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014

View Postmiju irl, on 10 November 2019 - 08:44 PM, said:

74% think it will bring new players. That of course is despite the fact that twice during the events numbers didnt go up.

 

-1/+1 is like arty nerfs. never going to happen 

You might be right about the highlighted part - seems too late and too little to save the game now....



TiagoBarriga #110 Posted 14 November 2019 - 06:04 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 7824 battles
  • 493
  • Member since:
    01-19-2016

View PostCatSnipah, on 14 November 2019 - 04:55 AM, said:

70-30. Enough said. 

 


Well now that we all voted for +1-1 we should use the above understandings, if WG continue not to make the changes everyone wants, how could it not die?


Often times, people simply deny the existence of what they do not understand, and anyone who tells them otherwise is a liar. What they don't know stays unexplained and they are happy with that
The only people who are mad at you for speaking the truth are those who are living a lie…
Keep speaking the truth

Stalkers Shortcut

miju irl #111 Posted 14 November 2019 - 07:34 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 17107 battles
  • 592
  • [IRL]
  • Member since:
    07-18-2015

View PostTiagoBarriga, on 14 November 2019 - 06:04 PM, said:


Well now that we all voted for +1-1 we should use the above understandings, if WG continue not to make the changes everyone wants, how could it not die?

 

If WG did that for every poll then the game wouldn't have alot of things



mr_rainmaker777 #112 Posted 14 November 2019 - 08:19 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 34584 battles
  • 709
  • [M1A]
  • Member since:
    07-10-2016
well im gonna say it,as unpopular as it is,i really dont think we have enough players anymore,im seeing during peak times 3v3 or 8v8 and other matches long que times and the same players on either side,crossplay needs to be turned on or roll crossplay with pc like other games or this ship sinks in two years max... :mellow:

JatemKaa #113 Posted 15 November 2019 - 12:33 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62379 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014

View Postmr_rainmaker777, on 14 November 2019 - 02:19 PM, said:

well im gonna say it,as unpopular as it is,i really dont think we have enough players anymore,im seeing during peak times 3v3 or 8v8 and other matches long que times and the same players on either side,crossplay needs to be turned on or roll crossplay with pc like other games or this ship sinks in two years max... :mellow:

 

Afraid it is already too late. Crossplay would give a short boost, but since the game play itself changed not one iota we will still be bleeding players at pretty much the same rate as without it.

matematicalone #114 Posted 16 November 2019 - 06:51 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 2880 battles
  • 1,453
  • Member since:
    11-15-2017

View Postmr_rainmaker777, on 14 November 2019 - 09:19 PM, said:

well im gonna say it,as unpopular as it is,i really dont think we have enough players anymore,im seeing during peak times 3v3 or 8v8 and other matches long que times and the same players on either side,crossplay needs to be turned on or roll crossplay with pc like other games or this ship sinks in two years max... :mellow:

 

View PostJatemKaa, on 15 November 2019 - 01:33 AM, said:

 

Afraid it is already too late. Crossplay would give a short boost, but since the game play itself changed not one iota we will still be bleeding players at pretty much the same rate as without it.

 

Crossplay is needed without question, but I'm afraid that crossplay with PC is out of the question. That ship has sailed long time ago...this is console, it's different and unique, you remember?

ToxicBullbog #115 Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:28 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 20034 battles
  • 2,221
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

I just think they should be working towards next gen, if  +/-1 benefits a majority of the players they should add it.

 

At the moment you aren't going to increase the playerbase by much but next gen is just around the corner, dropping 360 should open up plenty of development opportunities which is what this game needs. Launch it as WoT 2.0 on next gen with improved ui/graphics an actual balance pass and grab peoples attention when they have just the launch titles. I think +/-1 would help player retention along with cross-play to keep the server pop up.


I don't play anymore, just loiter around the forum from time to time.

https://www.youtube.com/c/AngryBullbog


Huncho_Mystic #116 Posted 16 November 2019 - 08:56 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11304 battles
  • 1,106
  • [ELDER]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2016

View PostToxicBullbog, on 16 November 2019 - 12:28 PM, said:

I just think they should be working towards next gen, if  +/-1 benefits a majority of the players they should add it.

 

At the moment you aren't going to increase the playerbase by much but next gen is just around the corner, dropping 360 should open up plenty of development opportunities which is what this game needs. Launch it as WoT 2.0 on next gen with improved ui/graphics an actual balance pass and grab peoples attention when they have just the launch titles. I think +/-1 would help player retention along with cross-play to keep the server pop up.

 

My thoughts as well

JatemKaa #117 Posted 18 November 2019 - 01:57 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62379 battles
  • 4,663
  • Member since:
    05-27-2014

View PostToxicBullbog, on 16 November 2019 - 02:28 PM, said:

I just think they should be working towards next gen, if  +/-1 benefits a majority of the players they should add it.

 

At the moment you aren't going to increase the playerbase by much but next gen is just around the corner, dropping 360 should open up plenty of development opportunities which is what this game needs. Launch it as WoT 2.0 on next gen with improved ui/graphics an actual balance pass and grab peoples attention when they have just the launch titles. I think +/-1 would help player retention along with cross-play to keep the server pop up.

Highlighted - agree. Anthem is doing the same as well, so why not. Go ahead and don't bother fixing it either - Fallout 76 shows that works as well.







Also tagged with MM, PMM

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users