Jump to content


Build a tank


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

SaltyCorpsman1 #1 Posted 12 November 2019 - 04:51 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9702 battles
  • 17
  • [CLOUD]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2017
I think a solid way to make the game feel fresh again would for wargaming to allow us to basically make our own merc tanks that are premium. Make the price based on tier of course but no $100 dollar tanks. Keept it at a 5-70 price going up per tier. This would allow every player to make and play those tanks we make up in our mind with whats in the game rather than the devs making one and andddd no missions needed just go and make your tanks and hit the purchase button

ATINvonRUEGEN #2 Posted 12 November 2019 - 05:09 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 12270 battles
  • 855
  • [WOTAN]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015
No :warte einfach:

PATRIOTICxTBro #3 Posted 12 November 2019 - 05:17 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15255 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

I agree I’ll pay for a maus hull, is7 turret, and waffle gun

 

oh and I’ll also pay for e3 hull with deathstar gun.

 

See how problematic this can get?



LignoTestudon #4 Posted 12 November 2019 - 07:02 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 284
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014

View PostSaltyCorpsman1, on 12 November 2019 - 11:51 AM, said:

I think a solid way to make the game feel fresh again would for wargaming to allow us to basically make our own merc tanks that are premium. Make the price based on tier of course but no $100 dollar tanks. Keept it at a 5-70 price going up per tier. This would allow every player to make and play those tanks we make up in our mind with whats in the game rather than the devs making one and andddd no missions needed just go and make your tanks and hit the purchase button

A solid way to make the game feel fresh would be allowing players to put different camo nets directly on tanks including Merc ones. I would love to see the Progetto 65 turret, WZ-132-1 chassis/hull, and the T54E1 105mm gun fused together as one.



LignoTestudon #5 Posted 12 November 2019 - 07:10 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 284
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014

View PostPATRIOTICxTBro, on 12 November 2019 - 12:17 PM, said:

I agree I’ll pay for a maus hull, is7 turret, and waffle gun

 

oh and I’ll also pay for e3 hull with deathstar gun.

 

See how problematic this can get?

 

Sounds cool. I like that. I would love to see it. I would also love to see the creation of an M60 chassis, Centurion 5/1 RAAC turret, and a Swedish AT gun together.

PATRIOTICxTBro #6 Posted 12 November 2019 - 07:16 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15255 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

View PostLignoTestudon, on 12 November 2019 - 11:10 AM, said:

 

Sounds cool. I like that. I would love to see it. I would also love to see the creation of an M60 chassis, Centurion 5/1 RAAC turret, and a Swedish AT gun together.

 

sounds game breaking 


LignoTestudon #7 Posted 12 November 2019 - 07:35 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 284
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014
How game-breaking would that Merc tank be like aside from the overall game?

LignoTestudon #8 Posted 12 November 2019 - 08:31 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 5657 battles
  • 284
  • [D7CAV]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2014
That M60 hull/Centurion Mk. 5/1 turret/Swedish AT gun union looks asinine. Nah. Nah. An M60 chassis, an Caernarvon upgraded turret, and the Object 430U's 100mm gun be fused together (call it Bridge Liner).

PATRIOTICxTBro #9 Posted 12 November 2019 - 08:40 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 15255 battles
  • 1,888
  • Member since:
    11-09-2013

View PostLignoTestudon, on 12 November 2019 - 11:35 AM, said:

How game-breaking would that Merc tank be like aside from the overall game?

 

Can you not see a problem with the hull of a maus turret of an is7 and the gun of a waffle. A tank that would be Impenetrable from the front and can do 3000+ damage in 10 seconds?

 

you really don’t see an issue with a tank that’s impenetrable when hull down that has a 183mm that can one shot lower tiers and do significant damage to equal tier tanks?

 

if you cannot you are the exact reason thus should never be introduced 



SaltyCorpsman1 #10 Posted 23 November 2019 - 01:46 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9702 battles
  • 17
  • [CLOUD]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2017
The best restrictions would be to have a set weight limit that the hull could support. This would vastly reduce any circumstances of maus is7 hybrid

wake_the_move #11 Posted 23 November 2019 - 08:27 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 11159 battles
  • 300
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

View PostPATRIOTICxTBro, on 12 November 2019 - 05:17 PM, said:

I agree I’ll pay for a maus hull, is7 turret, and waffle gun

oh and I’ll also pay for e3 hull with deathstar gun.

See how problematic this can get?

With 0.0 camo, a p/w ratio of 5 hp per ton and 10 kph top speed, 120 seconds reload time, 16 degrees hull / 18 degrees turret traverse speed, and 350 meters view range not so much anymore.


Edited by wake_the_move, 23 November 2019 - 08:28 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users