Jump to content


Tech Tree and Premium Tanks Nerfed at Port (Updated)

Port PC Console Nerf Nerfs Nerfed List

  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

Joco3000 #41 Posted 24 December 2019 - 09:02 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 27262 battles
  • 28,894
  • [JOCO]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2013

View Postrrmike, on 24 December 2019 - 09:01 AM, said:

Aren’t the fanboys past due for the “bring them in UP and WG will buff them later” post?

Oh, we were under the impression that WG would actually balance them when required. 

Have we even received a true balance patch this year? 


You can PM with with questions, if you wish. I don't bite.

Compilation thread of my ideas


TheOnlyTrueNoob #42 Posted 24 December 2019 - 09:03 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19415 battles
  • 2,070
  • [KAPPA]
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

View Postrrmike, on 24 December 2019 - 09:01 AM, said:

Aren’t the fanboys past due for the “bring them in UP and WG will buff them later” post?

 

Im pretty sure the standard argument now is “wE’rE nOt Pc, We’Re CoNsOlE”

3 Marked Tanks (92) (Bold = 100%)

 


natedaishmaster #43 Posted 24 December 2019 - 03:12 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 27606 battles
  • 398
  • [IMTLZ]
  • Member since:
    07-29-2014

View Postscwirpeo, on 23 December 2019 - 04:10 PM, said:

 

Eventually......

 

I'm confused. They never balanced the 183. When does this eventually happen? At the 9 year mark or something?

The 183 is “balanced” statistically, it’s not very OP. They don’t do a whole lot of damage on average and it’s hard to carry a 15v15 game with one so it has a lower win rate. It’s broken as hell though. Get lucky and one shot people. Same as arty. Balanced but broken. Both need serious reworks or remove from the game


3 MOE: Hellcat, Lycan, Sp1C, T20, M41 Bulldog, Motherland, STA 1, T95E2, Pershing, AMX 50 100, AMX 13 90, T54ltwt, T49, RU251, M46 Patton, Type 61, Leopard PTA, T54, E50, Batchat AP, Skoda T50, Centurion 7/1, Sharpshooter, T10, Conquerer, AMX 13 105, Sheridan, T-100LT, RHM PZW, Chisel, M48 Patton, Leopard 1, E50M, Obj 140, Batchat 25t, TVP 50/51, IS7, AMX 50B, Super Conqueror, The Machine, Chieftain, T110E4


Dr Bohiki #44 Posted 24 December 2019 - 05:37 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 24296 battles
  • 261
  • [IMTLZ]
  • Member since:
    04-16-2016
This just rekindles my opinions on the staff who decides these choices. How absurd they are for getting lazy and choosing to balance off graphs. These nerfs are blatantly noticable and in my opinion a sign that they do not care about our balancing opinions, and yes they are working with us on building a map and giving us discounts, but still I would like to have balancing done like the old days, with common sense.

Afro Palestine #45 Posted 25 December 2019 - 06:51 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 58045 battles
  • 5,219
  • [HKC]
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014
The fact they made the under-powered Pudel LESS powerful is a slap in the face of the Polish Resistance.

DertyChewbacca #46 Posted 25 December 2019 - 09:06 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 8898 battles
  • 2,718
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
Why did they nerf the Obj 907 so hard? Geez. If WGCB don't want to balance tanks, or "balance" tanks MAYBE once a year, why not just port over all tanks with PC stats and be done with it? Then they can just purely focus on selling OP premium and mercenary tanks that are better than their TT counter parts. Win win right? CB doesn't have to worry about balancing, they can just focus on sucking the community dry of their money.

Huncho_Mystic #47 Posted 25 December 2019 - 09:33 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 11426 battles
  • 1,169
  • [ELDER]
  • Member since:
    01-24-2016

View Postnatedaishmaster, on 23 December 2019 - 11:54 AM, said:

The real problem isn't the nerfs, it's the lack of balancing of existing tanks to the levels of the nerfed tanks. The SConq, M48, E4, and 5a are all at PC levels (better in the case of the E4 lol). WG uses PC as a starting point along with the winrate of the initial tier VIII prem released before the line to balance it. Eventually, they will probably adjust it correctly, but they take far to long to do so. Minor monthly balance tweaks would be beneficial (with a twice a year limit per individual tank) so that the game feels fresher and everything approaches approximately the same level at a bit of a quicker pace

 

Agree with everything expect the "they will probably adjust it correctly"

I am concerned the Italian tanks remain unchanged, and the nerfs like the AMX30 and 30b still remain.  The methods they choose to nerf are not sound



FBPrime #48 Posted 26 December 2019 - 07:50 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 52141 battles
  • 1,631
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostJoco3000, on 24 December 2019 - 04:02 AM, said:

Oh, we were under the impression that WG would actually balance them when required. 

Have we even received a true balance patch this year? 

 

The Centrifuge was nerfed.

"The 360 was released in 2005. The Super Nintendo was released in 1991. With the new Gen next year, the 360 will be farther behind the newest console than the Super Nintendo was behind the 360."


Red Dough Boy #49 Posted 26 December 2019 - 08:37 PM

    Major

  • Supertest - Xbox One
  • 28153 battles
  • 6,142
  • [_POI_]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2013

View PostDr Bohiki, on 24 December 2019 - 11:37 AM, said:

This just rekindles my opinions on the staff who decides these choices. How absurd they are for getting lazy and choosing to balance off graphs. These nerfs are blatantly noticable and in my opinion a sign that they do not care about our balancing opinions, and yes they are working with us on building a map and giving us discounts, but still I would like to have balancing done like the old days, with common sense.

 

I miss the first couple years when they would actually follow PC's lead, replacing tanks and giving people free premiums and easing the grind. If we could get rid of the "balancing," staff and keep people like Raibot and Max then that'd be fine by me. 


If I only had a Baneblade....

 

 

 


AnonymousHobo69 #50 Posted 26 December 2019 - 09:32 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 41198 battles
  • 4,664
  • [-N-]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2013

View PostFBPrime, on 26 December 2019 - 01:50 PM, said:

 

The Centrifuge was nerfed.

 

It was far to be powerful to leave alone. A tier 4 with a mediocre 76? Way too strong.
I have ascended.

Red Dough Boy #51 Posted 26 December 2019 - 09:40 PM

    Major

  • Supertest - Xbox One
  • 28153 battles
  • 6,142
  • [_POI_]
  • Member since:
    11-08-2013

View PostAnonymousHobo69, on 26 December 2019 - 03:32 PM, said:

 

It was far to be powerful to leave alone. An tier 4 with a mediocre 76? Way too strong.

 

Right? Can't let tier 5's have tier 7 medium tank armor, tier 6 health pool, and 55 km/h speed. O wait. 

 

I love that they nerf this and leave tanks like the WT Auf E 100 alone because of using win rates which is averaged by bringing bad players into the mix. 


If I only had a Baneblade....

 

 

 


FBPrime #52 Posted 28 December 2019 - 12:49 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 52141 battles
  • 1,631
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostRed Dough Boy, on 26 December 2019 - 04:40 PM, said:

 

Right? Can't let tier 5's have tier 7 medium tank armor, tier 6 health pool, and 55 km/h speed. O wait. 

 

I love that they nerf this and leave tanks like the WT Auf E 100 alone because of using win rates which is averaged by bringing bad players into the mix. 

 

And on the opposite side I'd the spectrum, you have better players skewing the stats if vehicles which are hardly ever played, such as the Centrifuge, K-91, 132-1 ect.

"The 360 was released in 2005. The Super Nintendo was released in 1991. With the new Gen next year, the 360 will be farther behind the newest console than the Super Nintendo was behind the 360."


FBPrime #53 Posted 31 December 2019 - 12:52 AM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 52141 battles
  • 1,631
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013
Added the Chimera shell changes as they were missing .

"The 360 was released in 2005. The Super Nintendo was released in 1991. With the new Gen next year, the 360 will be farther behind the newest console than the Super Nintendo was behind the 360."


Brbann #54 Posted 31 December 2019 - 07:33 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18455 battles
  • 31
  • [CSTD]
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015
 Obj. 907s dpm is really bad joke. 

AJH387 #55 Posted 31 December 2019 - 03:28 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 17420 battles
  • 2,731
  • [HLCAT]
  • Member since:
    12-10-2014

View PostBrbann, on 31 December 2019 - 02:33 AM, said:

 Obj. 907s dpm is really bad joke. 

 

I actually like it


FBPrime #56 Posted 31 December 2019 - 05:16 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 52141 battles
  • 1,631
  • [-L7-]
  • Member since:
    08-13-2013

View PostAJH387, on 31 December 2019 - 10:28 AM, said:

 

I actually like it

 

Got any reviews or advice on to how to average 3,500 damage averages in it?

"The 360 was released in 2005. The Super Nintendo was released in 1991. With the new Gen next year, the 360 will be farther behind the newest console than the Super Nintendo was behind the 360."


TocFanKe4 #57 Posted 31 December 2019 - 08:38 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21574 battles
  • 25,058
  • [GIRLS]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View Postrrmike, on 24 December 2019 - 03:01 AM, said:

Aren’t the fanboys past due for the “bring them in UP and WG will buff them later” post?

 

I'm all for bringing them in UP if they buff them later. But they never buff them later. And they bring in premium tanks and mercs that are OP, so it's kinda dumb to bring in UP tanks.

 

It really shows having competitive new lines are not their priority. New content is not the priority. New premium tanks and mercs they can make money on are the priority.  Being competitive in this game is based on the size of your wallet.


 

Scrambles The Death Dealer


XLilabnerX #58 Posted 31 December 2019 - 08:58 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 67041 battles
  • 1,919
  • Member since:
    05-10-2014

Well the decrease in que wasn't all explained by holiday. IMO massive mistake on the nerfs, but ya know WG never asked us. Iam severly cutting my playtime because of this.

 







Also tagged with Port, PC, Console, Nerf, Nerfs, Nerfed, List

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users