Jump to content


The new Swedish Medium Tanks with the Hydropneumatic Suspension are coming!

Swedish medium tanks Swedish mediums Swedish medium hydro hydropneumatic

  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

wake_the_move #21 Posted 14 March 2020 - 07:58 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13721 battles
  • 595
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015

View PostPATRIOTICxTBro, on 14 March 2020 - 03:52 AM, said:

Is the stb1 going to get it as well?

 

It took a while, but it eventually got it on PC. Might happen on console as well.

AWR Darda #22 Posted 14 March 2020 - 11:20 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17392 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    07-29-2015
i would really love to get the hydropneumatic suspension on stb1 also
..N-NANI?! KANSEI DORIFTO?

Nuke2099 #23 Posted 14 March 2020 - 12:19 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 24840 battles
  • 14,185
  • [KMD]
  • Member since:
    02-11-2014

View PostAndy8472, on 13 March 2020 - 04:16 PM, said:

 

Nerf? Aren't all the console tanks different from the PC anyway because it's a different game from the PC? Can't understand why people keep saying the tanks are nerfed

 

If console was really different we wouldn't be getting any of the tanks from PC. 
lQqtvt1.gif

A Big Sniff #24 Posted 14 March 2020 - 03:23 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 25896 battles
  • 31
  • [-SDW-]
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013

View PostAndy8472, on 13 March 2020 - 04:16 PM, said:

 

Nerf? Aren't all the console tanks different from the PC anyway because it's a different game from the PC? Can't understand why people keep saying the tanks are nerfed

 

everyone knows the tanks from pc of course so Yes a nerf. how are we different from pc when we have most of same of everything. its just anyother excuse to nerf a tank.

im_balthazur #25 Posted 14 March 2020 - 11:43 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 47300 battles
  • 605
  • [DODTR]
  • Member since:
    09-02-2017

View PostTornado F7, on 14 March 2020 - 12:18 AM, said:

 

How excited could people have got about 2 lines of tanks that never got off the drawing board?

 

At least the Czechs and Swedes actually built tanks. (And other quality weapons too).

Like the Japanese heavy line after t6. 
 

Which reminds me how a ridiculous grind it is to t10. For something that was created so the line would “exist”.



SightlessRogue0 #26 Posted 15 March 2020 - 12:37 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21505 battles
  • 3,215
  • Member since:
    05-16-2017

I was interested until I realized they weren't premium tanks.

I will wait for the reskin of UDES 15/16


I use Google translator for english language

Lots of juggling in french text, sometimes translator in trouble with that. If you do not understand what I write, tell me.


DrizzT_Tang #27 Posted 15 March 2020 - 08:59 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 12266 battles
  • 77
  • Member since:
    03-04-2016
430u dpm PC2588,console2256
1516 dpm PC2809,console2448??

GloryAndTrash #28 Posted 15 March 2020 - 09:44 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 15084 battles
  • 2,196
  • [-BBQ-]
  • Member since:
    12-29-2016

View PostDrizzT_Tang, on 15 March 2020 - 10:59 AM, said:

430u dpm PC2588,console2256
1516 dpm PC2809,console2448??

Who knows 



KRISTOBAL_777 #29 Posted 15 March 2020 - 12:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 28273 battles
  • 96
  • [1312]
  • Member since:
    02-09-2017

Why is the Udes 15/16 looking so ugly? This backpack is looking soo painful ugly, really bad job, ...



Ardle #30 Posted 16 March 2020 - 06:00 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 9873 battles
  • 93
  • Member since:
    06-01-2014
Hydropneumatic Suspension on the UDES 14/5 not that great as you don't have the bouncy turrent. you get full benefit when you reach tier ten the UDES 15/16. play it as a sniper flanker as you can't brawl in it.

youngslimzz #31 Posted 17 March 2020 - 10:56 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10119 battles
  • 12
  • [-KEK-]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
Yet another gigantic needless nerf to yet another new tier 10, I'm not even disappointed anymore. That would require expecting something positive in the first place. At least the nerf to the tier 9 isn't too dramatic, you know it's desperate when that's the good news :D:(:(

wake_the_move #32 Posted 17 March 2020 - 01:40 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 13721 battles
  • 595
  • Member since:
    12-04-2015
Pass!

Depauperate #33 Posted 17 March 2020 - 02:37 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 70 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    03-05-2020
You realize, I hope, that you can't just say, "get excited" and then have it happen when you keep ignoring community input.  There would have been excitement, except instead of dropping new and exciting tanks that might have mixed up the meta we get another line that arrives with a whimper instead of a bang. One might have hoped after the Italian drop you'd have at least have tried something different.  I'd be pretty interested to see how you explain the need to "nerf" to the UDES 14 considering the how strong the Draugen stats are.. except that the Draugen isn't free to play. Also interesting that the highest damage dealers at tier X are what, the M60, Chisel, and Machine? So much for exciting TT tanks. 

MrTrollPacMan #34 Posted 17 March 2020 - 02:40 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 19684 battles
  • 5,723
  • Member since:
    07-20-2013
Imagine how nice it would be if WG brought over some new tanks without tons of nerfs for once.

How much more variety we could have across the tiers if more things were competitive! Its a pipe dream I know, but it’s a nice thought

ChildOfTheAtom12 #35 Posted 17 March 2020 - 03:09 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 5624 battles
  • 32
  • Member since:
    01-10-2018
A tier 8 medium with less than 1700 dpm? Is this a joke?

TROCKS #36 Posted 17 March 2020 - 05:29 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18795 battles
  • 43
  • [47R]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2015

Reverse power creep... I have never seen anything like it (been doing it to every new TT line coming into the game for over a year). Let's add new TT tanks that are significantly worse than their peers. Hmmmm, that's a new take on creating excitement for a game. 



BauxCars #37 Posted 17 March 2020 - 06:39 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 40642 battles
  • 63
  • [ONUR6]
  • Member since:
    08-16-2015
I have been trying to play the new tier 8 and it is awful with top package and you only get better engine with top pkg or a tier 7 gun that is worse on stats than the previous pkg. I am filled with dread about the tier 9 & 10. Anything above a 105 gun will overmatch your armor. Gun handling is worse than stats because bloom on move is so bad.

AWR Darda #38 Posted 17 March 2020 - 06:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 17392 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    07-29-2015

wow, another incomplete update (no medium tanks rebalance, no leopard/stb1 rework, and so on) with a bunch of unnecessary nerfs from the pc counterparts.

 

I never really understood why you devs don't follow the pc changes and simply import them here. After 4 years of playing for me it's enough, that policy is simply unjustifiable.

 

Time to definitively leave this game!


..N-NANI?! KANSEI DORIFTO?

Funktastic Ed #39 Posted Yesterday, 05:52 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 19635 battles
  • 725
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

Bounced 4 consecutive shots from an AMX 50b shooting up close...

Who ever came up with this total bozo mechanic known as "Overmatch" is a complete ignorant, i dare him to come dabate this with me, this is absolutly unrealistic.

You can't deflect anything horyzontaly with a light armored vehicule just because you have wide open slopes, physic does not work that way, a 15kg hardened material going at hypersonic speed (1000 m/s is around Mach 4) brings a crazy amount of energy, more speed equal more Energy (E=MC² ) , this Energy is equivalent to mass, so when the shell actually arrives its like a dozen of tons i' m not even kidding  you need thickness to be able to absorb such formidable mass knocking on a reduced spot.

I'm sorry but i doubt 50mm of steel (not composite material right ?) is enough to deflect a 120 mm high velocity shell even with over obliquity, you would need more than early 70's technology to achieve that.

A 120mm shell is about 300mm long 6X longer than the armor thickness wich is 50mm...

Now, let's compare it to a 7.62 NATO anti armor projectile wich is about 20mm long, what you guys are telling us is that a 3mm thick steel plate can be sloped in order to deflect such shot… i really can't believe that, sorry.

And if it works like that for swedish vehicules then why does other poorly armored vehicules like Leopard 1 or AMX30 are penetrated in the front plate by nearly anything around without any effort ?

Your "Overmatch" mechanic seems to occur randomly. 

https://dspace.lib.c...e=3&isAllowed=y

 


Edited by Funktastic Ed, Today, 10:24 AM.

"Idiots dare everything, that's how you really know they are."




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users