Jump to content


WG: MAtchmaking is just fine


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

General_Blarg-p #1 Posted 02 August 2020 - 01:44 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 2884 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    02-18-2016
Uh huh sure. Cause this is acceptable to put your players through. If it was once in a blue moon I wouldn't have issue. But god its like every other match with this thing.
Ahh well mostly posted this for hyucks, since the first step to fixing it would WG admitting their wrong for once and well...look at the italian line to see how much they do that
44541de39d8280cd563dae1cf8ce96e2c138b7459c0fa666a478b620da722a14.jpg

pilotguy79-p #2 Posted 02 August 2020 - 02:15 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 19580 battles
  • 2,048
  • [FARC]
  • Member since:
    06-01-2016
That sucks, it’s happened to me quite a bit. How it balances platoons is the problem. It doesn’t see a tier 8 platoon and different from a tier 9 or ten. It simply sees a platoon.

WindedNickel18-x #3 Posted 02 August 2020 - 02:41 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 84933 battles
  • 159
  • Member since:
    03-13-2014
That’s nothing - I was in a t10 match where the other team had 10 heavies and we had 2. And another where all green were medium/td and red has heavies.

Matching #s of top tier heavies would go along way

John Arrowsmith-x #4 Posted 02 August 2020 - 07:03 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 84469 battles
  • 17,099
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
Did you try?    With the stupid xp change that looks like a match with potential for huge rewards.

                               

   This game needs a premium M3 Lee

 

 


General_Blarg-p #5 Posted 02 August 2020 - 09:49 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 2884 battles
  • 43
  • Member since:
    02-18-2016

View PostJohn Arrowsmith-x, on 01 August 2020 - 11:03 PM, said:

Did you try?    With the stupid xp change that looks like a match with potential for huge rewards.

 

Yep but my concealment was crap compared to their spotting, and dont even get me started on those KPz 50s. Bastards are a heavy tank in disguise

 



jujubugs-p #6 Posted 02 August 2020 - 10:01 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 18993 battles
  • 1,329
  • Member since:
    04-14-2016
Sad WG can't fix it because main priority is to encourage into buying premium time.

xKingTidusx-x #7 Posted 02 August 2020 - 10:48 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 12310 battles
  • 1,621
  • [XRAUT]
  • Member since:
    07-23-2015

Just had a Tier 8 game, we had a platoon of 2x tier 7 and the reds had 4 man platoon of tier 8s, very fair and balanced.

Thanks WG.



Jiveturkey o-x #8 Posted 02 August 2020 - 11:09 PM

    Captain

  • Players
  • 29359 battles
  • 1,446
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014
WG appreciates your concern, however look at it as a challenge and enjoy the extra xp fighting higher tiers :trollface:

"For a pessimist, i'm pretty optimistic"


MilitaryGoose05-x #9 Posted 03 August 2020 - 11:58 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15653 battles
  • 502
  • Member since:
    07-08-2015
MM has been noticeably worse since crossplay started, for sure.

killer etzi0-x #10 Posted 03 August 2020 - 12:36 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62696 battles
  • 20,374
  • Member since:
    06-20-2014

this example of MM has never made any sense to me, and after cross play it just shouldn't happen at all...

 

just sayin...


"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat."

 

Ronald Reagan
 

 


MilitaryGoose05-x #11 Posted 03 August 2020 - 12:58 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 15653 battles
  • 502
  • Member since:
    07-08-2015
Yep, what fun is the line tier VIII having in a tier X matchup? Zero fun. Except for the occasional masochist who posts on these topics saying he loves being the only tier VIII in a tier X game.

The Psyclepath-x #12 Posted 03 August 2020 - 01:07 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 18257 battles
  • 35
  • Member since:
    04-27-2014

and to top off the mismatched platoon MM, WG seems to be encouraging more platooning with some of these new OPs! Sometimes I wonder if any of these developers actually think about the players behaviors that result from these OPs.  

 



killer etzi0-x #13 Posted 03 August 2020 - 01:19 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 62696 battles
  • 20,374
  • Member since:
    06-20-2014

View PostMilitaryGoose05-x, on 03 August 2020 - 06:58 AM, said:

Yep, what fun is the line tier VIII having in a tier X matchup? Zero fun. Except for the occasional masochist who posts on these topics saying he loves being the only tier VIII in a tier X game.

 

I've never seen anyone post that here.

 

Nice try though


"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat."

 

Ronald Reagan
 

 


PLR65-x #14 Posted 05 August 2020 - 12:57 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39388 battles
  • 212
  • Member since:
    08-17-2014
WGC needs 4-5 man platoons removed and PC matchmaker to balance tiers between teams

6 years we’ve put up with this [edited]. And now with cross play now and it’s still a huge problem. I was hoping the bigger player base would allow the WGC MM to be better. But no - if anything it’s worse as they have been encouraging platoons. The bigger the better. I’m of the opinion the WGC are either [edited]stupid or just don’t play the game. Or just give in to the loud minority that must have 3-4 squad members online to load the game.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users