Jump to content


Intel Briefing - Recap - 04/06/21

Intel Insider Information WoTConsole Twitch Stream New Game Mode New Vision New Consumables Artillery Era Based Matchmaking

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
94 replies to this topic

choppermeir-p #61 Posted 07 April 2021 - 05:53 PM

    Captain

  • WoTC Community Contributor
  • 14941 battles
  • 1,983
  • [-PLEB]
  • Member since:
    01-30-2016

View PostPhonicKitty8825-x, on 07 April 2021 - 04:59 AM, said:

Kinda like this too. Larger maps would be fun with arty.

 

I'm sure in the stream they said the new bigger maps will be used by high tiers of the ww2 version of the game so arty won't miss out on it. 

 


">

TheSteelTomato-x #62 Posted 07 April 2021 - 06:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 484 battles
  • 84
  • [KMKAZ]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018

View PostUn De Fonceur-x, on 07 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

(sigh) ... Don't you think, guys it is a bit too early to complain ?

 

Nope.

 

Why?

 

Because of 2 things:

1) The word "Classic" (classic = legacy= deprecated)

2) Progress of 6.0 "fixes" (very little)

 

It's pretty clear from those 2 things that WG intend to kill the game as we know it. Basically they are determined to turn chess into chequers. True Vision & no arty? Basically they are completely changing two fundamentals of the game, turning it into something completely different. 

We saw what they tried to do with 6.0. We can clearly see what they intend to do with "Classic" i.e. kill it.

 

Now you're right, WG management might defy all past experience and surprise us, this new mode might be great, but it definitely won't be World of Tanks.

 

 



PhonicKitty8825-x #63 Posted 07 April 2021 - 07:45 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21918 battles
  • 2,561
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    04-10-2019

View Postchoppermeir-p, on 07 April 2021 - 05:53 PM, said:

 

I'm sure in the stream they said the new bigger maps will be used by high tiers of the ww2 version of the game so arty won't miss out on it. 

 

It will be balanced out, arty won't have enough range.


3 MoE: IS-7           Tier X Aces: T 100 LT, T95E6, Obj. 430, 121, TVP T50/51, Valour T95/FV4201 Chieftain, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 277, Obj. 705a, Type 5 Heavy, Obj. 268, Obj. 268v5,  

                                    Jagdpanzer E100                  

https://gamerdvr.com...video/126807488 10k game

 


Adi_Waw_PL-p #64 Posted 07 April 2021 - 08:03 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10358 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016

View PostAleTieCan05-x, on 07 April 2021 - 05:09 PM, said:

 ......and you deleted today the discussion where there was the trailer link? very, very unfair and not very transparent way of life :angry:)

 

 

You mean this link: https://youtu.be/rdPUqMZeSqs

P.S. I wonder if this post will also be deleted :hiding:



PhonicKitty8825-x #65 Posted 07 April 2021 - 08:13 PM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21918 battles
  • 2,561
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    04-10-2019

View PostAdi_Waw_PL-p, on 07 April 2021 - 08:03 PM, said:

 

You mean this link: https://youtu.be/rdPUqMZeSqs

P.S. I wonder if this post will also be deleted :hiding:

You might get banned lol.


3 MoE: IS-7           Tier X Aces: T 100 LT, T95E6, Obj. 430, 121, TVP T50/51, Valour T95/FV4201 Chieftain, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 277, Obj. 705a, Type 5 Heavy, Obj. 268, Obj. 268v5,  

                                    Jagdpanzer E100                  

https://gamerdvr.com...video/126807488 10k game

 


Adi_Waw_PL-p #66 Posted 07 April 2021 - 08:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10358 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016

View PostPhonicKitty8825-x, on 07 April 2021 - 08:13 PM, said:

You might get banned lol.

 

Why ? For posting a link to a video that I'm not even the author of ? No, it would be unjustified discrimination, and the received "ban" does not comply with the provisions of the regulations ... Anyway, the link is also available on other channels, so - just google it ... But we'll wait and see.:popcorn:

 

As Danny Glover said - I'm too old for this ... I laugh at this WG game of hide and seek with the players. Hiding information, blocking threads ... We are in 2021, and the flow of information on the Internet is fast, "censorship" is over :teethhappy:


Edited by Adi_Waw_PL-p, 07 April 2021 - 09:05 PM.


SGT Rock 1963-x #67 Posted 08 April 2021 - 01:26 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 12878 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    08-10-2013

View PostSGT Rock 1963-x, on 07 April 2021 - 12:23 AM, said:

Wg when you pull the plug and shut it down. Can you revert, One of the servers to 4.6 "Classic" version of proving grounds. With all the missions?  At least let us enjoy our premiums. Just let it run pve. I'd pay a monthly subscription cost.  Thanks for the years, It was great fun.

 

If you did this now, With one of the dormant servers. I guarantee you'd be surprised, In the player interest and support.

 



xXabelkrackXx-x #68 Posted 08 April 2021 - 02:31 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 30594 battles
  • 1
  • [1RBBR]
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015
El juego está disminuyendo desde la actualización que he estado jugando durante 6 años y creo que el juego está en su peor etapa la calidad de los jugadores ha disminuido demasiado creado que los jugadores veteranos ya han dejado el juego que todavía podrían rescatar el juego, pero no creo que les importe y menos sus jugadores

PhonicKitty8825-x #69 Posted 08 April 2021 - 05:51 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21918 battles
  • 2,561
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    04-10-2019

View PostAdi_Waw_PL-p, on 07 April 2021 - 08:37 PM, said:

 

Why ? For posting a link to a video that I'm not even the author of ? No, it would be unjustified discrimination, and the received "ban" does not comply with the provisions of the regulations ... Anyway, the link is also available on other channels, so - just google it ... But we'll wait and see.:popcorn:

 

As Danny Glover said - I'm too old for this ... I laugh at this WG game of hide and seek with the players. Hiding information, blocking threads ... We are in 2021, and the flow of information on the Internet is fast, "censorship" is over :teethhappy:

It doesn´t look that bad,  besides the planes and helicopters though.


3 MoE: IS-7           Tier X Aces: T 100 LT, T95E6, Obj. 430, 121, TVP T50/51, Valour T95/FV4201 Chieftain, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 277, Obj. 705a, Type 5 Heavy, Obj. 268, Obj. 268v5,  

                                    Jagdpanzer E100                  

https://gamerdvr.com...video/126807488 10k game

 


AleTieCan05-x #70 Posted 08 April 2021 - 07:38 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 52630 battles
  • 985
  • Member since:
    02-28-2014

View PostAdi_Waw_PL-p, on 07 April 2021 - 08:03 PM, said:

 

You mean this link: https://youtu.be/rdPUqMZeSqs

P.S. I wonder if this post will also be deleted :hiding:

thank you; in any case this deletion perfectly clarifies WG Chicago&Baltimore's point of view on the concepts of "transparency", "correctness" and "trust in one's own work".... nothing else to add...



Adi_Waw_PL-p #71 Posted 08 April 2021 - 08:52 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10358 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016

View PostPhonicKitty8825-x, on 08 April 2021 - 05:51 AM, said:

It doesn´t look that bad,  besides the planes and helicopters though.

 

I am also glad that WG is trying to change something in WoT. Unfortunately, over the years, the game has become stiff and must get a fresh breeze - regardless of Fanboy's opinion ... The material is from a few years ago and concerns a buried project, the gameplay will certainly not look the same. As for helicopters - I'm happy because they fascinate me (as long as their mechanics are not broken) :great:

PhonicKitty8825-x #72 Posted 08 April 2021 - 09:54 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21918 battles
  • 2,561
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    04-10-2019

View PostAdi_Waw_PL-p, on 08 April 2021 - 08:52 AM, said:

 

I am also glad that WG is trying to change something in WoT. Unfortunately, over the years, the game has become stiff and must get a fresh breeze - regardless of Fanboy's opinion ... The material is from a few years ago and concerns a buried project, the gameplay will certainly not look the same. As for helicopters - I'm happy because they fascinate me (as long as their mechanics are not broken) :great:

Well it wasn't burried because it was bad, right? If I renember correctly someone leaked it.


3 MoE: IS-7           Tier X Aces: T 100 LT, T95E6, Obj. 430, 121, TVP T50/51, Valour T95/FV4201 Chieftain, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 277, Obj. 705a, Type 5 Heavy, Obj. 268, Obj. 268v5,  

                                    Jagdpanzer E100                  

https://gamerdvr.com...video/126807488 10k game

 


AleTieCan05-x #73 Posted 08 April 2021 - 10:08 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 52630 battles
  • 985
  • Member since:
    02-28-2014

View PostPhonicKitty8825-x, on 08 April 2021 - 09:54 AM, said:

Well it wasn't burried because it was bad, right? If I renember correctly someone leaked it.

and do you really think that a company would throw away such an investment with a whole new game just because it was "leaked"?.. there is a full length trailer on the net... also "leaked"? :sceptic:



Adi_Waw_PL-p #74 Posted 08 April 2021 - 10:31 AM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 10358 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016

View PostPhonicKitty8825-x, on 08 April 2021 - 09:54 AM, said:

Well it wasn't burried because it was bad, right? If I renember correctly someone leaked it.

 

Honestly, I don't remember the details of the "leak" ... As for burning projects - someone remember Duke Nukem Forever :teethhappy:

What it will look like in the end depends on how many "new / improved" and "old / broken" solutions are in the planned mode.


Edited by Adi_Waw_PL-p, 08 April 2021 - 10:31 AM.


VerbotenCandy-x #75 Posted 08 April 2021 - 02:43 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16173 battles
  • 592
  • [CRPT]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2015

View PostUn De Fonceur-x, on 07 April 2021 - 11:20 AM, said:

 

As long as I despise artillery (I mean how it is built in the game, not the players, of course ! ), I still thinking it has its place in the game … But its current state isn’t good. I have ideas to fix it, but it would be too long to explain it. If I can, I will create a topic where I explain (without salt, without insult) how to possibly do so.
« Its place ?? What kind of place ?? The cancer one ?! » you may be thinking … Let me explain : Tanks classes are made to work like in a game of rock-paper-scissor : lights beat artilleries < mediums beat lights < heavies beat mediums < artilleries beat heavies.


Do you understand ? Without it, tanks with thick armor, especially those on the turret (the « hulldown » ones, like Kranvagn, S.Conqueror, Obj.430U, Obj279e, etc.) would dominate the battlefields. And we would have nearly no solution to this, unless having luck and penetrating weak spot on their turret (with PREMIUM, of course ! That’s why we call them WEAK-SPOTS … Sorry for my sarcasm), or shooting HE. Yeah, so much fun -_-  .

So my biggest fear, with this mode, is to see hulldown tanks crushing down anything they encounter … But if maps are designed well enough, it should not happen too much. So … « Wait and see ».



VerbotenCandy-x #76 Posted 08 April 2021 - 02:59 PM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16173 battles
  • 592
  • [CRPT]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2015

Even the forums are broken, how typically Wargaming :)

 

Maps, maps, maps and maps - I originally typed out a longer reply, but I think it just comes back to this; that so many of our issues stem from the fact that the maps appear to have been designed without a mind on the game mechanics and user experience intended.



TangentalHarp19-x #77 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Players
  • 30297 battles
  • 39
  • [SAC]
  • Member since:
    02-12-2014
Can we tone down the sun on sand river, it's still blinding.

baalsagaath-p #78 Posted 08 April 2021 - 07:13 PM

    Staff sergeant

  • Players
  • 28091 battles
  • 390
  • Member since:
    03-21-2016

View PostMintoVimto-x, on 06 April 2021 - 10:59 PM, said:

Hello all!
 
(...) with the Classic WOT experience.

that sounds GREAT

 

....just I'm afraid by "classic"  they for some reason might be referring to the last 4 months, not the 6 (?) years before.

 



GamerPaws-x #79 Posted 08 April 2021 - 08:48 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 26654 battles
  • 2,331
  • Member since:
    09-29-2013
Here s feedback for u: after watching for 4months WGCB not fixing this game and adding things nobody asked for, i play mostly Outriders and after reading about this new mode as priority for WGCB i reinstalled WarThunder, hope this feedback helps.
Vanitas vanitatum et omnia vanitas

PhonicKitty8825-x #80 Posted 09 April 2021 - 05:11 AM

    Major

  • Players
  • 21918 battles
  • 2,561
  • [1CAB]
  • Member since:
    04-10-2019
Question: Because of era based MM, does this mean that the Maus (or almost any german tier 10 that's not the Rhm or Leo) could fight T-34s and Shermans and other tier 5s,6s and 7s?

3 MoE: IS-7           Tier X Aces: T 100 LT, T95E6, Obj. 430, 121, TVP T50/51, Valour T95/FV4201 Chieftain, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 277, Obj. 705a, Type 5 Heavy, Obj. 268, Obj. 268v5,  

                                    Jagdpanzer E100                  

https://gamerdvr.com...video/126807488 10k game

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users