Jump to content

Konnichi wa Commanders

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

Greywoolfe64 #21 Posted 28 September 2016 - 05:58 AM


  • Players
  • 16831 battles
  • 2,187
  • [27PZR]
  • Member since:
Ohaiu kasawii mass, tankers! Took the plunge into Japanese tanks last night, buying the Chi Nu Kai- had a very pleasant evening methodically taking out enemy tanks, and I'm a convert! Will be buying more garage slots when they become available in bargain packages (You listening, WG?) and will try out the Japanese tech tree as soon as I can. Arigato, and sayonara. :B

"Some say that he dines on lower glacis, and that he once spent three weeks hiding in a thick French bush. All we know is, he's called the Stug!"

Current garage (MOE's marked with star*) -click spoiler.



MatureDolphin86 #22 Posted 25 October 2016 - 12:35 AM

    First lieutenant

  • Players
  • 10883 battles
  • 805
  • [TSFF]
  • Member since:
when will we get the heavy tank no.6?

Crazyelite78 #23 Posted 29 January 2018 - 03:13 AM


  • Beta Tester
  • 5375 battles
  • 10
  • Member since:

View PostLEEFERNEE, on 03 March 2015 - 05:55 AM, said:

Its awful tank and the auto loader isnt worth using when I have a 3.18 reload time with the single shot. 

Its so bad all the other tanks laugh it and trip it up as it goes by. 

I actually liked the chi ri. Takes a while to get used to the play style but i think the auto loader was actually good


Wangetang #24 Posted 11 March 2018 - 07:17 AM


  • Beta Tester
  • 9269 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:

After reading some about the proposed guns to for use on the Chi-ri if it made it to production, a late model version was to use a version of the Type 99 88mm AA gun was going to be mounted. It would be an interesting option to add for a top spec Chi-Ri upgrade. Would be like a Japanese version of the VK30.02D equipped with the 8.8cm Kw.K 36 L/56. 

Would the autoloading 75mm still be the better gun to have equipped or would an 88 mm be better? 

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users